John52 Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? As the only country in the world to have been continuously at war for over 100 years https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/sep/08/britains-secret-wars-oman Can we afford to increase our military spending as Jeremy Hunt wants - already the highest military spending in Europe - to get involved in more wars? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malc d Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted July 20, 2019 Author Share Posted July 20, 2019 malc d - 2019-07-20 10:30 AM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Perhaps the solution is as obvious as the consequences of seizing the Iranian Tanker was. We need to give each other our tankers back. We just have to find a way of dressing it up so the English Government saves face, or they won't do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 John52 - 2019-07-20 10:38 AM malc d - 2019-07-20 10:30 AM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Perhaps the solution is as obvious as the consequences of seizing the Iranian Tanker was. We need to give each other our tankers back. We just have to find a way of dressing it up so the English Government saves face, or they won't do it. That wouldn't please our US boss and worlds bully-boy though who keeps piling on the pressure through punitive sanctions against Iran, desperately trying to provoke them to war, now trying to muscle in on something which is none of his business. Iran of course has never started a war or invaded a country in over 200 years. Trump of course is excited by this latest development hinting, "well we have a lot of ships out there that are warships....", doesn't take much to figure what he really wants. But the last thing UK needs is trigger happy yanks messing things up as the last time they shot down an Iranian passenger aircraft murdering all 290 passengers and crew in exactly the same area. The former UK Ambassador to Iran was talking on BBC Breakfast this morning and what he said made sense. Scroll to 3hr 10m 53sec mark https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00071dd/breakfast-20072019 Just have to hope it's sorted before that clown Johnson gets the keys to number 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 5:23 PM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:38 AM malc d - 2019-07-20 10:30 AM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Perhaps the solution is as obvious as the consequences of seizing the Iranian Tanker was. We need to give each other our tankers back. We just have to find a way of dressing it up so the English Government saves face, or they won't do it. That wouldn't please our US boss and worlds bully-boy though who keeps piling on the pressure through punitive sanctions against Iran, desperately trying to provoke them to war, now trying to muscle in on something which is none of his business. Iran of course has never started a war or invaded a country in over 200 years. Trump of course is excited by this latest development hinting, "well we have a lot of ships out there that are warships....", doesn't take much to figure what he really wants. But the last thing UK needs is trigger happy yanks messing things up as the last time they shot down an Iranian passenger aircraft murdering all 290 passengers and crew in exactly the same area. The former UK Ambassador to Iran was talking on BBC Breakfast this morning and what he said made sense. Scroll to 3hr 10m 53sec mark https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00071dd/breakfast-20072019 Just have to hope it's sorted before that clown Johnson gets the keys to number 10. 'US boss ... worlds bully-boy ... punitive sanctions ... provoke them to war ... muscle in ... trigger happy Yanks etc etc"... The Yanks are to blame it seems ... No sorry POTUS Trump is to blame ... More hate from the hater spewing the usual hate ... His hate even managed to get in "that clown Johnson" n'all ... Lordy My Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 6:23 PM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:38 AM malc d - 2019-07-20 10:30 AM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Perhaps the solution is as obvious as the consequences of seizing the Iranian Tanker was. We need to give each other our tankers back. We just have to find a way of dressing it up so the English Government saves face, or they won't do it. That wouldn't please our US boss and worlds bully-boy though who keeps piling on the pressure through punitive sanctions against Iran, desperately trying to provoke them to war, now trying to muscle in on something which is none of his business. Iran of course has never started a war or invaded a country in over 200 years. Trump of course is excited by this latest development hinting, "well we have a lot of ships out there that are warships....", doesn't take much to figure what he really wants. But the last thing UK needs is trigger happy yanks messing things up as the last time they shot down an Iranian passenger aircraft murdering all 290 passengers and crew in exactly the same area. The former UK Ambassador to Iran was talking on BBC Breakfast this morning and what he said made sense. Scroll to 3hr 10m 53sec mark https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00071dd/breakfast-20072019 Just have to hope it's sorted before that clown Johnson gets the keys to number 10. As usual you lie and grossly exaggerate. You really the most disgusting creature whose hatred of the USA blinds him to the truth and reality. 'Iran has never stared a war'. No, it gets others to do it and arms and finances them. Iran has been involved in proxy wars in the Middle East for decades. https://www.haaretz.com/middle-east-news/iran-spends-billions-on-proxy-wars-here-s-where-its-money-is-going-1.5630081 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/may/16/iran-tells-middle-east-militias-prepare-for-proxy-war This is the odious regime that you appear to be supporting and praising over the democracy that is the world's biggest bulwark against the kind of terrorism for which Iran is responsible. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/12/iran-committing-crimes-against-humanity-by-concealing-fate-of-thousands-of-slaughtered-political-dissidents/ https://www.unitedagainstnucleariran.com/index.php/resources/human-rights-history https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/irans-srebrenica-how-ayatollah-khomeini-sanctioned-the-deaths-of-20000-enemies-of-the-state-8485984.html https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2019/country-chapters/iran http://www.thetower.org/article/who-will-talk-about-iran-war-crimes-in-syria/ There is no evidence whatsoever that the USA is deliberately trying to start a war with Iran. Trump has gone out of his way to do the opposite. But your biggest lie is that the USA 'murdered' 290 passengers of the Iranian jet that it shot down. That was a dreadful mistake by the captain of the USS Vincennes and his crew who were convinced that they'd locked on to an F14 Tomcat, one of Iran's aircraft at that time. The Vincennes asked ten times for the aircraft to identify itself before shooting it down as it got nearer and nearer. However, they were only broadcasting on military frequencies when they should have also tried civilian ones. A dreadful mistake as it happened but a mistake nevertheless. America had nothing to gain and everything to lose by shooting down a civilian aircraft but, to people such as you, who hate your own country and our western democracies, anything done by the USA must be a deliberate war crime, whilst at the same time you whitewash one of the most odious regimes in history by saying:' Iran of course has never started a war or invaded a country in over 200 years.' Shame on you again for your hateful lies. No one denies it happened and the USA apologised profusely at the International Court of Justice and paid $63 million dollars compensation to the victims. To suggest that the USA would deliberately 'murder' innocent civilians is travesty from a sick and twisted mind. The West, as opposed to the Islamic savages that have been murdering millions all over the world, has always tried to minimise civilian casualties as much as possible. You're a true Corbynite. Support our enemies, denigrate our main democratic ally and lie and mislead every time you post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 6:29 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 6:23 PM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:38 AM malc d - 2019-07-20 10:30 AM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Perhaps the solution is as obvious as the consequences of seizing the Iranian Tanker was. We need to give each other our tankers back. We just have to find a way of dressing it up so the English Government saves face, or they won't do it. That wouldn't please our US boss and worlds bully-boy though who keeps piling on the pressure through punitive sanctions against Iran, desperately trying to provoke them to war, now trying to muscle in on something which is none of his business. Iran of course has never started a war or invaded a country in over 200 years. Trump of course is excited by this latest development hinting, "well we have a lot of ships out there that are warships....", doesn't take much to figure what he really wants. But the last thing UK needs is trigger happy yanks messing things up as the last time they shot down an Iranian passenger aircraft murdering all 290 passengers and crew in exactly the same area. The former UK Ambassador to Iran was talking on BBC Breakfast this morning and what he said made sense. Scroll to 3hr 10m 53sec mark https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00071dd/breakfast-20072019 Just have to hope it's sorted before that clown Johnson gets the keys to number 10. As usual you lie and grossly exaggerate. You really the most disgusting creature whose hatred of the USA blinds him to the truth and reality. 'Iran has never stared a war'. No, it gets others to do it and arms and finances them. Iran has been involved in proxy wars in the Middle East for decades.Yeah it's been fighting IS in Syria the past eight years, even joining forces with Iraqi Kurds to fight them.....perhaps you'd prefer IS just took over instead? There is no evidence whatsoever that the USA is deliberately trying to start a war with Iran. Trump has gone out of his way to do the opposite.Hhmm.....piling on sanctions plus pulling US out of the nuclear deal it had signed to, kinda a looks a touch provocative to me and far from the actions of someone "going out of his way to do the opposite". https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/01/07/do-sanctions-lead-to-war/ But your biggest lie is that the USA 'murdered' 290 passengers of the Iranian jet that it shot down. That was a dreadful mistake by the captain of the USS Vincennes and his crew who were convinced that they'd locked on to an F14 Tomcat, one of Iran's aircraft at that time. A dreadful mistake as it happened but a mistake nevertheless. An Airbus 300 is quite a lot bigger than an F14 and as everyone knows, the Russians who shot down MH17 over Ukraine in 2014, tried the same excuse. It didn't work for them as charges have been brought against three Russians and a Ukrainian. The charges filed are murder and international arrest warrants have been issued. The case will begin in the Netherlands on 9 March 2020. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 8:04 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 6:29 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 6:23 PM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:38 AM malc d - 2019-07-20 10:30 AM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Perhaps the solution is as obvious as the consequences of seizing the Iranian Tanker was. We need to give each other our tankers back. We just have to find a way of dressing it up so the English Government saves face, or they won't do it. That wouldn't please our US boss and worlds bully-boy though who keeps piling on the pressure through punitive sanctions against Iran, desperately trying to provoke them to war, now trying to muscle in on something which is none of his business. Iran of course has never started a war or invaded a country in over 200 years. Trump of course is excited by this latest development hinting, "well we have a lot of ships out there that are warships....", doesn't take much to figure what he really wants. But the last thing UK needs is trigger happy yanks messing things up as the last time they shot down an Iranian passenger aircraft murdering all 290 passengers and crew in exactly the same area. The former UK Ambassador to Iran was talking on BBC Breakfast this morning and what he said made sense. Scroll to 3hr 10m 53sec mark https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00071dd/breakfast-20072019 Just have to hope it's sorted before that clown Johnson gets the keys to number 10. As usual you lie and grossly exaggerate. You really the most disgusting creature whose hatred of the USA blinds him to the truth and reality. 'Iran has never stared a war'. No, it gets others to do it and arms and finances them. Iran has been involved in proxy wars in the Middle East for decades.Yeah it's been fighting IS in Syria the past eight years, even joining forces with Iraqi Kurds to fight them.....perhaps you'd prefer IS just took over instead? There is no evidence whatsoever that the USA is deliberately trying to start a war with Iran. Trump has gone out of his way to do the opposite.Hhmm.....piling on sanctions plus pulling US out of the nuclear deal it had signed to, kinda a looks a touch provocative to me and far from the actions of someone "going out of his way to do the opposite". https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/01/07/do-sanctions-lead-to-war/ But your biggest lie is that the USA 'murdered' 290 passengers of the Iranian jet that it shot down. That was a dreadful mistake by the captain of the USS Vincennes and his crew who were convinced that they'd locked on to an F14 Tomcat, one of Iran's aircraft at that time. A dreadful mistake as it happened but a mistake nevertheless. An Airbus 300 is quite a lot bigger than an F14 and as everyone knows, the Russians who shot down MH17 over Ukraine in 2014, tried the same excuse. It didn't work for them as charges have been brought against three Russians and a Ukrainian. The charges filed are murder and international arrest warrants have been issued. The case will begin in the Netherlands on 9 March 2020. You do know what 'proxy wars' are don't you? Iran has been involved in them for forty years and this is the barbarous regime that you're defending. You have no evidence whatsoever that the US is deliberately trying to provoke Iran into war. The link you give is just an opinion that sometimes sanctions can lead to war. Does this mean then that every other country that has imposed sanctions on another state is doing it in the hope of starting a war? Is the EU trying to provoke Russia into a war with the sanctions that it's imposed? An Airbus 300 is bigger than an F14? Wow, is that the level of intellect that you're going to display again? At no time either after the event or during the official enquiry at the ICJ was a visual sighting any part of the accusation. The plane was a blip on a radar screen for God's sake. And your example of the Ukraine incident is brainless and pointless. So in your mind because one shooting down of a civilian aircraft may be proved to be true, every other one must be as well? That is one of your more utterly moronic diversions. You are despicable. You accuse the US of deliberately shooting down a civilian aircraft and 'murdering' 290 people. All independent bodies examining this incident accept that it wasn't known that it was a civilian aircraft. Only Iran, as you would expect from these savages, accused the US of knowing that it was a civilian craft. This was a dreadful error. Some experts believe that the captain actually acted correctly under the rules of war and the situation in that region at the time. Many others believe that the captain was reckless and it was a grave mistake. But to accuse the US of deliberately shooting down the plane in full knowledge that it was a civilian craft is a vile accusation that could only come from the deranged mind of a man who hates the USA so much that it has warped whatever fair and decent analysis he possesses. Shame on you yet again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted July 20, 2019 Author Share Posted July 20, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 8:53 PM There is no evidence whatsoever that the USA is deliberately trying to start a war with Iran. Trump has gone out of his way to do the opposite. Who was it pulled out of our nuclear agreement with Iran *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 8:53 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 8:04 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 6:29 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 6:23 PM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:38 AM malc d - 2019-07-20 10:30 AM John52 - 2019-07-20 10:25 AM Was this unpredictable? Was it sensible to seize an Iranian Tanker? Have they forgotten Iraq already :-( It's what happens when we haven't had a functioning government for three years. :-| Perhaps the solution is as obvious as the consequences of seizing the Iranian Tanker was. We need to give each other our tankers back. We just have to find a way of dressing it up so the English Government saves face, or they won't do it. That wouldn't please our US boss and worlds bully-boy though who keeps piling on the pressure through punitive sanctions against Iran, desperately trying to provoke them to war, now trying to muscle in on something which is none of his business. Iran of course has never started a war or invaded a country in over 200 years. Trump of course is excited by this latest development hinting, "well we have a lot of ships out there that are warships....", doesn't take much to figure what he really wants. But the last thing UK needs is trigger happy yanks messing things up as the last time they shot down an Iranian passenger aircraft murdering all 290 passengers and crew in exactly the same area. The former UK Ambassador to Iran was talking on BBC Breakfast this morning and what he said made sense. Scroll to 3hr 10m 53sec mark https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m00071dd/breakfast-20072019 Just have to hope it's sorted before that clown Johnson gets the keys to number 10. As usual you lie and grossly exaggerate. You really the most disgusting creature whose hatred of the USA blinds him to the truth and reality. 'Iran has never stared a war'. No, it gets others to do it and arms and finances them. Iran has been involved in proxy wars in the Middle East for decades.Yeah it's been fighting IS in Syria the past eight years, even joining forces with Iraqi Kurds to fight them.....perhaps you'd prefer IS just took over instead? There is no evidence whatsoever that the USA is deliberately trying to start a war with Iran. Trump has gone out of his way to do the opposite.Hhmm.....piling on sanctions plus pulling US out of the nuclear deal it had signed to, kinda a looks a touch provocative to me and far from the actions of someone "going out of his way to do the opposite". https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2012/01/07/do-sanctions-lead-to-war/ But your biggest lie is that the USA 'murdered' 290 passengers of the Iranian jet that it shot down. That was a dreadful mistake by the captain of the USS Vincennes and his crew who were convinced that they'd locked on to an F14 Tomcat, one of Iran's aircraft at that time. A dreadful mistake as it happened but a mistake nevertheless. An Airbus 300 is quite a lot bigger than an F14 and as everyone knows, the Russians who shot down MH17 over Ukraine in 2014, tried the same excuse. It didn't work for them as charges have been brought against three Russians and a Ukrainian. The charges filed are murder and international arrest warrants have been issued. The case will begin in the Netherlands on 9 March 2020. You do know what 'proxy wars' are don't you? Iran has been involved in them for forty years and this is the barbarous regime that you're defending. I've already clearly stated Iran has not started a war in over 200 years, but that wasn't the question i asked you. You have no evidence whatsoever that the US is deliberately trying to provoke Iran into war. The link you give is just an opinion that sometimes sanctions can lead to war.Neither do you have any they are not but i notice in each response you make you always add little extras to many points i've made...ie; "deliberately trying" is not what i said at all......that's what you added for effect, isn't it? I said the piling on of sanctions "looked a touch provocative" which is quite different. As for the linked article it seemed relatively balanced and informative to me. I'm not sure if his sanctions are fully recognised under international law though according to some msm articles they are in breach. Does this mean then that every other country that has imposed sanctions on another state is doing it in the hope of starting a war? Is the EU trying to provoke Russia into a war with the sanctions that it's imposed? Afaik EU sanctions haven't stopped Russia trading or been trying to bring it to its knees by wrecking it's economy, an intention Trump has openly admitted re Iran. But you won't have EU sanctions to worry about much longer An Airbus 300 is bigger than an F14? Wow, is that the level of intellect that you're going to display again? Yeah F14's also fly at Mach 2.5 where an Airbus only manages a fifth of that at a lumbering 500mph. Amazing isn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Has Corbyn condemned his pirate mates yet? :-| ......... Nah thought not *-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-07-20 10:08 PM Has Corbyn condemned his pirate mates yet? :-| ......... Nah thought not *-) ........ Has May? Nah thought not.....that's what we have a FS for you dummy which thankfully isn't Johnson because he'd just make matters worse. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 10:57 PM Yeah F14's also fly at Mach 2.5 where an Airbus only manages a fifth of that at a lumbering 500mph. Amazing isn't it. And that one sentence typifies your level of intelligence and logical thought. You're you full of hatred that it's addled your brain. Do you really think that an Iranian fighter jet travelling a very short distance to attack a ship in the Persian Gulf is going to get up to 3000 kph? It would be in Saudi Arabia in minutes. But just as the official enquiry didn't believe that there was any visual identification, neither did it try to make this incredibly stupid assertion that speed was a factor. Do you ever stop to think for a minute or two before coming out with some of the guff that you post? Making you look silly is getting to be a habit of mine. You do make it easy though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 10:22 PM pelmetman - 2019-07-20 10:08 PM Has Corbyn condemned his pirate mates yet? :-| ......... Nah thought not *-) ........ Has May? Nah thought not.....that's what we have a FS for you dummy which thankfully isn't Johnson because he'd just make matters worse. *-) So what's Corbyn's shadow FS said Dummy? *-) ............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 11:22 PM pelmetman - 2019-07-20 10:08 PM Has Corbyn condemned his pirate mates yet? :-| ......... Nah thought not *-) ........ Has May? Nah thought not.....that's what we have a FS for you dummy which thankfully isn't Johnson because he'd just make matters worse. *-) You're unbelievable. The fact the we have a FS hasn't stopped Comrade Corbyn commenting on everything under the sun. Mainly Israel and the USA of course or any action we take on any of our enemies. Just do a quick Google on Corbyn and comments. Sit back and wait for the avalanche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:33 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 10:57 PM Yeah F14's also fly at Mach 2.5 where an Airbus only manages a fifth of that at a lumbering 500mph. Amazing isn't it. And that one sentence typifies your level of intelligence and logical thought. You're you full of hatred that it's addled your brain. Hhmm......"full of hatred" now, echoing the latest mantra of "hater" slung out with abandon for anyone with a differing opinion. Is this a new buzz word for Brexiters? Anyone daring to express a differing opinion gets branded a "hater". Oh brother. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7267349/Corbyn-blames-Trump-Irans-seizure-British-tanker-calls-talk-wind-tensions.html What a D*ckhead *-) ............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 11:45 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:33 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 10:57 PM Yeah F14's also fly at Mach 2.5 where an Airbus only manages a fifth of that at a lumbering 500mph. Amazing isn't it. And that one sentence typifies your level of intelligence and logical thought. You're you full of hatred that it's addled your brain. Hhmm......"full of hatred" now, echoing the latest mantra of "hater" slung out with abandon for anyone with a differing opinion. Is this a new buzz word for Brexiters? Anyone daring to express a differing opinion gets branded a "hater". Oh brother. *-) Another diversion after you've been made to look silly again. 'Come on lads, there's a US warship a hundred miles away. Take her up to Mach 2.5.' As for being a hater it spews out of you like a fountain. The language that you use to describe anyone who is slightly to the right of Tony Benn is disgraceful. You just can't turn off the vitriol and sheer nastiness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-07-20 11:49 PM https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7267349/Corbyn-blames-Trump-Irans-seizure-British-tanker-calls-talk-wind-tensions.html What a D*ckhead *-) ............ Oh look, Corbyn's commenting. I thought that's what we had a FS for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:40 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 11:22 PM pelmetman - 2019-07-20 10:08 PM Has Corbyn condemned his pirate mates yet? :-| ......... Nah thought not *-) ........ Has May? Nah thought not.....that's what we have a FS for you dummy which thankfully isn't Johnson because he'd just make matters worse. *-) You're unbelievable. The fact the we have a FS hasn't stopped Comrade Corbyn commenting on everything under the sun. Mainly Israel and the USA of course or any action we take on any of our enemies. So what? Corbyn is leader of opposition so it's his job to challenge 'everything under the sun'....just as Tories would, and do, when they are in opposition. Of course you'd prefer he sat there, said nothing and did as he was told by a weak Tory government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted July 20, 2019 Share Posted July 20, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:56 PM Another diversion after you've been made to look silly again. 'Come on lads, there's a US warship a hundred miles away. Take her up to Mach 2.5.' As for being a hater it spews out of you like a fountain. The language that you use to describe anyone who is slightly to the right of Tony Benn is disgraceful. You just can't turn off the vitriol and sheer nastiness.FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:58 PM pelmetman - 2019-07-20 11:49 PM https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7267349/Corbyn-blames-Trump-Irans-seizure-British-tanker-calls-talk-wind-tensions.html What a D*ckhead *-) ............ Oh look, Corbyn's commenting. I thought that's what we had a FS for. The vitriol and sheer nastiness you speak of has oozed from your pores with regularity ever since you first came barging into this forum like a bull in a china shop, primarily aimed at myself and any of my posts. You're a very vindictive individual positively seething with venomous hatred even extending to mounting a tirade of abuse attacking me over my past employment in UK Defence, a legitimate industry, which certainly left me in no doubt you are an unbalanced person in need of professional help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 11:55 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:56 PM Another diversion after you've been made to look silly again. 'Come on lads, there's a US warship a hundred miles away. Take her up to Mach 2.5.' As for being a hater it spews out of you like a fountain. The language that you use to describe anyone who is slightly to the right of Tony Benn is disgraceful. You just can't turn off the vitriol and sheer nastiness.FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:58 PM pelmetman - 2019-07-20 11:49 PM https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7267349/Corbyn-blames-Trump-Irans-seizure-British-tanker-calls-talk-wind-tensions.html What a D*ckhead *-) ............ Oh look, Corbyn's commenting. I thought that's what we had a FS for. The vitriol and sheer nastiness you speak of has oozed from your pores with regularity ever since you first came barging into this forum like a bull in a china shop, primarily aimed at myself and any of my posts. You're a very vindictive individual positively seething with venomous hatred even extending to mounting a tirade of abuse attacking me over my past employment in UK Defence, a legitimate industry, which certainly left me in no doubt you are an unbalanced person in need of professional help. Have to say Funster is making you look rather silly and childish ... Maybe you should just calm down a little with the hatred and attempt to discuss different views without all your usual side issue stuff ... "vitriol , sheer nastiness , oozed from your pores , barging into this forum , vindictive , seething with venomous hatred , tirade of abuse , unbalanced person in need of professional help" ... Very telling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted July 21, 2019 Author Share Posted July 21, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:33 PM Do you really think that an Iranian fighter jet travelling a very short distance to attack a ship in the Persian Gulf is going to get up to 3000 kph? I'm not setting myself up as an expert like yourself *-) But I do know that fighter jets use speed wherever they can - it makes them harder to see coming and shoot down. Otherwise whats the point of having a jet that can travel so fast? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted July 21, 2019 Share Posted July 21, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 11:36 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-07-20 10:40 PM Bulletguy - 2019-07-20 11:22 PM pelmetman - 2019-07-20 10:08 PM Has Corbyn condemned his pirate mates yet? :-| ......... Nah thought not *-) ........ Has May? Nah thought not.....that's what we have a FS for you dummy which thankfully isn't Johnson because he'd just make matters worse. *-) You're unbelievable. The fact the we have a FS hasn't stopped Comrade Corbyn commenting on everything under the sun. Mainly Israel and the USA of course or any action we take on any of our enemies. So what? Corbyn is leader of opposition so it's his job to challenge 'everything under the sun'....just as Tories would, and do, when they are in opposition. Of course you'd prefer he sat there, said nothing and did as he was told by a weak Tory government. I'd prefer genuine Socialists to "take back control" of their party from a Islamic/IRA terrorist loving Communist :-| ......... After the next election of course >:-) ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted July 21, 2019 Author Share Posted July 21, 2019 Birdbrain - 2019-07-21 7:48 AM Have to say Funster is making you look rather silly and childish ... Maybe you should just calm down a little with the hatred and attempt to discuss different views without all your usual side issue stuff ... "vitriol , sheer nastiness , oozed from your pores , barging into this forum , vindictive , seething with venomous hatred , tirade of abuse , unbalanced person in need of professional help" ... Very telling Bullet is quoting facts with links to back them up. Compare that with you, Pelmet & Funster *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.