Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Worth reading the whole article; The Prime Minister is now supposedly anchoring the daily afternoon press conference but those expecting him to deliver some sort of road map for the way out of the lockdown and the catastrophe we find ourselves in will probably find themselves very disappointed. As Dominic Raab announced on Wednesday, there will be no major decision on easing the restrictions before May 7. Now the government finds itself in a position where it has to over-compensate to prove it is not negligent. Its as if they are going to shoot the horse before it bolts just to be certain. The Tories now find themselves trapped in another dilemma. The party is funded by corporate donors and those donors are seeing their investment evaporate amid the crisis. Over 80 per cent of Tory funding – and therefore their political existence relies on this cash and not member donations – and this may well force them to act in their interests and not that of the nation. It’s the same in America, another unfolding human disaster. https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/covid-19-vs-the-economy-the-trouble-britain-now-finds-itself-in/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Birdbrain - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... From their about page ;-) ........ "The purpose of TruePublica is to enable more informed decisions and opinions on matters such as civil liberty, human rights, privacy, social, economic and environmental issues as well as pivotal events such as Brexit and the effects of Trump’s America and geopolitical changes that are unfolding in front of us all." No bias there then (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-05-06 8:19 PM Birdbrain - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... From their about page ;-) ........ "The purpose of TruePublica is to enable more informed decisions and opinions on matters such as civil liberty, human rights, privacy, social, economic and environmental issues as well as pivotal events such as Brexit and the effects of Trump’s America and geopolitical changes that are unfolding in front of us all." No bias there then (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... It is NOT bias to "enable more informed decisions and opinions" so once you've read the article in full, you can give the forum your "informed opinion" about it. Tell us what you agree with or disagree with, and importantly, why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 8:39 PM pelmetman - 2020-05-06 8:19 PM Birdbrain - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... From their about page ;-) ........ "The purpose of TruePublica is to enable more informed decisions and opinions on matters such as civil liberty, human rights, privacy, social, economic and environmental issues as well as pivotal events such as Brexit and the effects of Trump’s America and geopolitical changes that are unfolding in front of us all." No bias there then (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... It is NOT bias to "enable more informed decisions and opinions" so once you've read the article in full, you can give the forum your "informed opinion" about it. Tell us what you agree with or disagree with, and importantly, why. I don't need to read it do I? ;-) .......... Any website that is purposely set up to slag off Brexit or Trump has F'all to do with "informed opinion" *-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-05-06 8:19 PM Birdbrain - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... From their about page ;-) ........ "The purpose of TruePublica is to enable more informed decisions and opinions on matters such as civil liberty, human rights, privacy, social, economic and environmental issues as well as pivotal events such as Brexit and the effects of Trump’s America and geopolitical changes that are unfolding in front of us all." No bias there then (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... How very BeeGee ... Hes open to so much ... As long as it fits in with his hate agenda Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumpstart Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S All our existence relies on get the country back working again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-05-06 8:43 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 8:39 PM pelmetman - 2020-05-06 8:19 PM Birdbrain - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... From their about page ;-) ........ "The purpose of TruePublica is to enable more informed decisions and opinions on matters such as civil liberty, human rights, privacy, social, economic and environmental issues as well as pivotal events such as Brexit and the effects of Trump’s America and geopolitical changes that are unfolding in front of us all." No bias there then (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... It is NOT bias to "enable more informed decisions and opinions" so once you've read the article in full, you can give the forum your "informed opinion" about it. Tell us what you agree with or disagree with, and importantly, why. I don't need to read it do I? ;-) .......... Any website that is purposely set up to slag off Brexit or Trump has F'all to do with "informed opinion" *-) ......... No, not if you don't want to expand your mind preferring to stay stuck in your timewarp bubble......but if you did you'd be disappointed to find it doesn't 'slag off' Brexit or Trump. Until you have something to contribute about the thread topic, there's no point in you posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:02 PM pelmetman - 2020-05-06 8:43 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 8:39 PM pelmetman - 2020-05-06 8:19 PM Birdbrain - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... Bullet ... Hatred ... Tory ... From their about page ;-) ........ "The purpose of TruePublica is to enable more informed decisions and opinions on matters such as civil liberty, human rights, privacy, social, economic and environmental issues as well as pivotal events such as Brexit and the effects of Trump’s America and geopolitical changes that are unfolding in front of us all." No bias there then (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... It is NOT bias to "enable more informed decisions and opinions" so once you've read the article in full, you can give the forum your "informed opinion" about it. Tell us what you agree with or disagree with, and importantly, why. I don't need to read it do I? ;-) .......... Any website that is purposely set up to slag off Brexit or Trump has F'all to do with "informed opinion" *-) ......... No, not if you don't want to expand your mind preferring to stay stuck in your timewarp bubble......but if you did you'd be disappointed to find it doesn't 'slag off' Brexit or Trump. Until you have something to contribute about the thread topic, there's no point in you posting. I don't need brain washing by lefty muppets *-) .......... I get enough of that from You and Waldorf (lol) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 jumpstart - 2020-05-06 8:54 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S All our existence relies on get the country back working again. At the cost of thousands more lives? Don't you think enough have been lost already? Take a look at the other thread, a new strain has been found which spreads faster and makes people more susceptible to secondary infection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:07 PM jumpstart - 2020-05-06 8:54 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S All our existence relies on get the country back working again. At the cost of thousands more lives? Don't you think enough have been lost already? Take a look at the other thread, a new strain has been found which spreads faster and makes people more susceptible to secondary infection. So if you're right and other EU countries are hit with another wave :-| .......... Will you be slagging them off as well or just Boris? ;-) .......... As if we didn't know the answer *-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-05-06 9:11 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:07 PM jumpstart - 2020-05-06 8:54 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S All our existence relies on get the country back working again. At the cost of thousands more lives? Don't you think enough have been lost already? Take a look at the other thread, a new strain has been found which spreads faster and makes people more susceptible to secondary infection. So if you're right and other EU countries are hit with another wave :-| .......... Will you be slagging them off as well or just Boris? ;-) .......... As if we didn't know the answer *-) ......... Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? Until you have something to contribute about the thread topic, there's no point in you posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:18 PM pelmetman - 2020-05-06 9:11 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:07 PM jumpstart - 2020-05-06 8:54 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S All our existence relies on get the country back working again. At the cost of thousands more lives? Don't you think enough have been lost already? Take a look at the other thread, a new strain has been found which spreads faster and makes people more susceptible to secondary infection. So if you're right and other EU countries are hit with another wave :-| .......... Will you be slagging them off as well or just Boris? ;-) .......... As if we didn't know the answer *-) ......... Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? Until you have something to contribute about the thread topic, there's no point in you posting. Annoying the Hate squad is a contribution I'm happy to make >:-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:08 PM Worth reading the whole article; https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/covid-19-vs-the-economy-the-trouble-britain-now-finds-itself-in/ Yes its the truth So not what they want to hear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-05-06 9:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:18 PM Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? Until you have something to contribute about the thread topic, there's no point in you posting. Annoying the Hate squad is a contribution I'm happy to make Well if thats the best you can muster you're better off staying on Barrys forum as adult debate on a topic is just not your forte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 John52 - 2020-05-06 9:38 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:08 PM Worth reading the whole article; https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/covid-19-vs-the-economy-the-trouble-britain-now-finds-itself-in/ Yes its the truth So not what they want to hear It's too much reading for Pelmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 John52 - 2020-05-06 9:38 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:08 PM Worth reading the whole article; https://truepublica.org.uk/united-kingdom/covid-19-vs-the-economy-the-trouble-britain-now-finds-itself-in/ Yes its the truth So not what they want to hear The truth? 8-) .............From a lefty website (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:40 PM pelmetman - 2020-05-06 9:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 9:18 PM Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? Until you have something to contribute about the thread topic, there's no point in you posting. Annoying the Hate squad is a contribution I'm happy to make Well if thats the best you can muster you're better off staying on Barrys forum as adult debate on a topic is just not your forte. Adult debate??? 8-) .......... (lol) (lol) (lol) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tracker Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S It's not news it's sensation seeking hypothetical fancy - why would anyone in government want plans that are under discussion leaked to michief makers pretending to be journalists. Just to remind you - news is the reporting of things that actually happen, not the invention of a story to suit your own agenda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
747 Posted May 6, 2020 Share Posted May 6, 2020 Tracker - 2020-05-06 10:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S It's not news it's sensation seeking hypothetical fancy - why would anyone in government want plans that are under discussion leaked to michief makers pretending to be journalists. Just to remind you - news is the reporting of things that actually happen, not the invention of a story to suit your own agenda. You are wasting your time trying to enlighten him in the basic concepts of truth versus the Media. He has proved over and over again that he is blind to suggestion that does not fit in with his warped views. I'm just pleased that he is not intelligent enough to be dangerous. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 6, 2020 Author Share Posted May 6, 2020 Tracker - 2020-05-06 10:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S It's not news it's sensation seeking hypothetical fancy - why would anyone in government want plans that are under discussion leaked to michief makers pretending to be journalists. Just to remind you - news is the reporting of things that actually happen, not the invention of a story to suit your own agenda. I felt it covered a number of very valid points which have been in other media outlets including those more right leaning. It's an independent media which (to quote), to raise awareness of misinformation, disinformation, fake news and propaganda and focuses on challenging current neoliberal ideology and a toxic political environment that is causing a wave of disruption as western countries move from one social and economic crisis to another. I don't see anything 'sensation seeking' about that. They leave that stuff for the DM, Sun and Express. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 Tracker - 2020-05-06 10:19 PM Just to remind you - news is the reporting of things that actually happen, not the invention of a story to suit your own agenda. Do you seriously think the Downing Street Press Briefings parroted off by the BoJo supporting media fit that discription? FT compared the increase in deaths over previous years with the official death figures (even after being forced to include care homes ) less than half the actual increase in deaths The only reason the NHS has not been overwhelmed, is the public have been told 'don't call us, go home and die so you are not counted in the official death figures' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 7, 2020 Share Posted May 7, 2020 747 - 2020-05-06 10:27 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 10:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-05-06 7:58 PM Tracker - 2020-05-06 7:35 PM I'll ask Boris to run all his plans past you first for your valued input, which no doubt he would totally ignore, but at least you could really say with some supporting evidence that the government is badly advised. Which parts of the article did you disagree and agree with and why? :-S It's not news it's sensation seeking hypothetical fancy - why would anyone in government want plans that are under discussion leaked to michief makers pretending to be journalists. Just to remind you - news is the reporting of things that actually happen, not the invention of a story to suit your own agenda. You are wasting your time trying to enlighten him in the basic concepts of truth versus the Media. He has proved over and over again that he is blind to suggestion that does not fit in with his warped views. I'm just pleased that he is not intelligent enough to be dangerous. :D That's the problem our resident Loser Brigade face ;-) .......... They're not bright enough to know that we can see right through them 8-) ......... If they were anymore transparent they'd be double glazed (lol) (lol) (lol) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.