antony1969 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 They'll be out screaming on the streets about these criminals ... https://news.sky.com/story/dozens-to-be-deported-on-charter-flight-to-jamaica-after-living-in-uk-for-decades-11626748 ... Weathers nice in Jamaica Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 antony1969 - 2019-02-03 5:47 PM They'll be out screaming on the streets about these criminals ... https://news.sky.com/story/dozens-to-be-deported-on-charter-flight-to-jamaica-after-living-in-uk-for-decades-11626748 ... Weathers nice in Jamaica There is not a dreadlock in sight but your racism makes the link subconsciously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted February 3, 2019 Author Share Posted February 3, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-02-03 6:02 PM antony1969 - 2019-02-03 5:47 PM They'll be out screaming on the streets about these criminals ... https://news.sky.com/story/dozens-to-be-deported-on-charter-flight-to-jamaica-after-living-in-uk-for-decades-11626748 ... Weathers nice in Jamaica There is not a dreadlock in sight but your racism makes the link subconsciously. Your a proper little professionally offended bore aint ya ... You'll be OK on here sweetheart ... Whats racist about dreadlocks , in my younger days I tried some myself ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violet1956 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 This is good news Antony. Successive governments on both sides of the divide have singularly failed to remove foreign criminals deserving of deportation for many years. Such positive action as this is to be celebrated. I don’t care where people come from, whether they sport dreadlocks or have any other outward signs of “difference”. What matters is whether the public interest demands that they be deported. However, there is a taint of underlying prejudice in your post in that none of the people subject to deportation action was described or pictured in the report as sporting dreadlocks. It is inevitable that people such as Fast Pat question why you even mention it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 antony1969 - 2019-02-03 6:07 PM Fast Pat - 2019-02-03 6:02 PM antony1969 - 2019-02-03 5:47 PM They'll be out screaming on the streets about these criminals ... https://news.sky.com/story/dozens-to-be-deported-on-charter-flight-to-jamaica-after-living-in-uk-for-decades-11626748 ... Weathers nice in Jamaica There is not a dreadlock in sight but your racism makes the link subconsciously. Your a proper little professionally offended bore aint ya ... You'll be OK on here sweetheart ... Whats racist about dreadlocks , in my younger days I tried some myself ??? You should get some now! You will need some pritstick to stick em on though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 8:42 PM This is good news Antony. Successive governments on both sides of the divide have singularly failed to remove foreign criminals deserving of deportation for many years. Such positive action as this is to be celebrated. I don’t care where people come from.... How 'foreign' are they Veronica? From what i can see all are British citizens. May seems to believe Jamaica is still a British colony over which 'her' imperialist 'Empire' rules. The ex-forces chap would not have been able to join without being a citizen under 1981 Nationality Act and must have lived in UK for a minimum five years. Whatever his sentence was for, is this really how we want to repay someone who served in Afghanistan? It makes a mockery of "for Queen and country" doesn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violet1956 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Sorry BG I do not have the fullest information. I only posted in order to resonded to Antony's post. If you give me some links I might understand better the individual cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 9:30 PM Sorry BG I do not have the fullest information. I only posted in order to responded to Antony's post. If you give me some links I might understand better the individual cases. Off the Sky link he posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violet1956 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 I've read it again BG but there is nothing about them being British citizens, only reference to how long they have lived in the UK. Clearly that is relevant as to whether they ought to be deported, as is their existing ties to the the UK and lack of such ties in Jamaica. Nevertheless I don't believe there is anything in the report that indicates that their deportation is not justified. They have rights of appeal against such decisions and the article is silent as to whether they have exercised them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 10:16 PM I've read it again BG but there is nothing about them being British citizens, only reference to how long they have lived in the UK. Clearly that is relevant as to whether they ought to be deported, as is their existing ties to the the UK and lack of such ties in Jamaica. Nevertheless I don't believe there is anything in the report that indicates that their deportation is not justified. They have rights of appeal against such decisions and the article is silent as to whether they have exercised them. I can't see anything in the report to suggest it is justified either! The ex-forces guy in particular would have to have been a UK citizen and lived here minimum five years. All seems very rushed to me and the only connection any of them appear to have with Jamaica is through parentage. I watched Ainsley Harriott the other day on a cookery programme. Do we deport him if he gets caught speeding purely for having Jamaican parentage? What next...deportation of Welsh, Irish and Scottish criminals out of Little England due to parental heritage? :-S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violet1956 Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Perhaps there needs to me more transparency regarding the deportation decisions made in each of their cases BG. So far you and I and the rest of Joe public have only adumbrated news reports to go on. I think there is a real need for the Home Office, the courts and tribunals to make sure the reasons for their decisions are widely available. Sad to say we can't rely on news reportst to be free of bias these days, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 11:15 PM Perhaps there needs to me more transparency regarding the deportation decisions made in each of their cases BG. So far you and I and the rest of Joe public have only adumbrated news reports to go on. I think there is a real need for the Home Office, the courts and tribunals to make sure the reasons for their decisions are widely available. Sad to say we can't rely on news reportst to be free of bias these days, Description of offences is somewhat vague to say the least though i did find more detail on one who had been involved in a police chase driving at 115mph. Some years ago my brother-in-law got nabbed on the M20 by an unmarked police car who clocked him at 112mph. He got 6 points on his licence (already had 6 on as well)....how come he wasn't deported?!! I note the ex-forces guy came back from serving in Afghanistan with PTSD. I'm not surprised. When my son was in he had a few mates who ended up that way and one even tried taking his own life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted February 4, 2019 Author Share Posted February 4, 2019 Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 8:42 PM This is good news Antony. Successive governments on both sides of the divide have singularly failed to remove foreign criminals deserving of deportation for many years. Such positive action as this is to be celebrated. I don’t care where people come from, whether they sport dreadlocks or have any other outward signs of “difference”. What matters is whether the public interest demands that they be deported. However, there is a taint of underlying prejudice in your post in that none of the people subject to deportation action was described or pictured in the report as sporting dreadlocks. It is inevitable that people such as Fast Pat question why you even mention it. Your right it is inevitable that things like fat pat will question it ... Cant believe I have to explain but it was simply a play on 10cc Dreadlock Holiday which obviously is a very racist song ... How naughty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted February 4, 2019 Author Share Posted February 4, 2019 Barryd999 - 2019-02-03 8:45 PM antony1969 - 2019-02-03 6:07 PM Fast Pat - 2019-02-03 6:02 PM antony1969 - 2019-02-03 5:47 PM They'll be out screaming on the streets about these criminals ... https://news.sky.com/story/dozens-to-be-deported-on-charter-flight-to-jamaica-after-living-in-uk-for-decades-11626748 ... Weathers nice in Jamaica There is not a dreadlock in sight but your racism makes the link subconsciously. Your a proper little professionally offended bore aint ya ... You'll be OK on here sweetheart ... Whats racist about dreadlocks , in my younger days I tried some myself ??? You should get some now! You will need some pritstick to stick em on though. Be fun would it not ... I could black up a bit like Mary Poppins did back in the day but I see the professional wet drips are complaining over that now ... How very sad to be permanently offended Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted February 4, 2019 Author Share Posted February 4, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-02-03 9:27 PM Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 8:42 PM This is good news Antony. Successive governments on both sides of the divide have singularly failed to remove foreign criminals deserving of deportation for many years. Such positive action as this is to be celebrated. I don’t care where people come from.... How 'foreign' are they Veronica? From what i can see all are British citizens. May seems to believe Jamaica is still a British colony over which 'her' imperialist 'Empire' rules. The ex-forces chap would not have been able to join without being a citizen under 1981 Nationality Act and must have lived in UK for a minimum five years. Whatever his sentence was for, is this really how we want to repay someone who served in Afghanistan? It makes a mockery of "for Queen and country" doesn't it? As foreign as these fellas ??? ... Im sure all has been checked by the Government and is totally legal as Mrs May wont want what you want and her being "charged with crimes against humanity" ... I prefer my sympathies to lie with the victims of the crimes and not the criminals personally but whatever floats your boat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 antony1969 - 2019-02-04 6:17 AM Your right it is inevitable that things like fat pat will question it ... Cant believe I have to explain but it was simply a play on 10cc Dreadlock Holiday which obviously is a very racist song ... How naughty Poor thing you must have been up all night dreaming up that pathetic excuse. You responded to my original post in 5 mins, more than 12 hours later you dream up the 10cc link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted February 4, 2019 Author Share Posted February 4, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-02-04 7:44 AM antony1969 - 2019-02-04 6:17 AM Your right it is inevitable that things like fat pat will question it ... Cant believe I have to explain but it was simply a play on 10cc Dreadlock Holiday which obviously is a very racist song ... How naughty Poor thing you must have been up all night dreaming up that pathetic excuse. You responded to my original post in 5 mins, more than 12 hours later you dream up the 10cc link. Sorry sweetheart ... You've been awake all this time waiting ... Looks like Bullet ain't the only one with a little black book on me ... Looks like your still offended too ... After you've logged my reply in your book you can pop off to bed now I've replied cant you ... Nite nite darling xx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 11:15 PM Perhaps there needs to me more transparency regarding the deportation decisions made in each of their cases BG. So far you and I and the rest of Joe public have only adumbrated news reports to go on. I think there is a real need for the Home Office, the courts and tribunals to make sure the reasons for their decisions are widely available. Sad to say we can't rely on news reportst to be free of bias these days, I suspect the wets have ignored those who are guilty of very serious crimes ......... This faux outrage by the forums usual suspects reminds me of those airplane passengers who prevented a rapist from being deported *-) ................ Halo polishing has consequences :-| ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Violet1956 Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 I remember the passenger incident, utter twits, as if the job wasn't difficult enough already. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted February 4, 2019 Author Share Posted February 4, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-02-04 8:44 AM Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 11:15 PM Perhaps there needs to me more transparency regarding the deportation decisions made in each of their cases BG. So far you and I and the rest of Joe public have only adumbrated news reports to go on. I think there is a real need for the Home Office, the courts and tribunals to make sure the reasons for their decisions are widely available. Sad to say we can't rely on news reportst to be free of bias these days, I suspect the wets have ignored those who are guilty of very serious crimes ......... This faux outrage by the forums usual suspects reminds me of those airplane passengers who prevented a rapist from being deported *-) ................ Halo polishing has consequences :-| ........... Thay daft bat in Sweden who stopped a flight from taking a criminal back home is on trial today ... What's the bet liberal Sweden wont give her the 6 months she should get ... Sweden is lost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 antony1969 - 2019-02-04 6:33 AM Bulletguy - 2019-02-03 9:27 PM Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 8:42 PM This is good news Antony. Successive governments on both sides of the divide have singularly failed to remove foreign criminals deserving of deportation for many years. Such positive action as this is to be celebrated. I don’t care where people come from.... How 'foreign' are they Veronica? From what i can see all are British citizens. May seems to believe Jamaica is still a British colony over which 'her' imperialist 'Empire' rules. The ex-forces chap would not have been able to join without being a citizen under 1981 Nationality Act and must have lived in UK for a minimum five years. Whatever his sentence was for, is this really how we want to repay someone who served in Afghanistan? It makes a mockery of "for Queen and country" doesn't it? As foreign as these fellas ??? ...Im sure all has been checked by the Government and is totally legal.... From the article it appears they are British citizens and their only connection to Jamaica being through parental ancestry. We stopped deporting our own citizens over 150 years ago. Given governments past record on so called "checking" and deciding the legalities, i have very little faith in that!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-02-04 8:44 AM Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 11:15 PM Perhaps there needs to me more transparency regarding the deportation decisions made in each of their cases BG. So far you and I and the rest of Joe public have only adumbrated news reports to go on. I think there is a real need for the Home Office, the courts and tribunals to make sure the reasons for their decisions are widely available. Sad to say we can't rely on news reportst to be free of bias these days, I suspect the wets have ignored those who are guilty of very serious crimes ......... Errm......one was done for a speeding offence. Hardly "very serious crime" and definitely not in the realms of rape. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted February 4, 2019 Author Share Posted February 4, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-02-04 3:43 PM pelmetman - 2019-02-04 8:44 AM Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 11:15 PM Perhaps there needs to me more transparency regarding the deportation decisions made in each of their cases BG. So far you and I and the rest of Joe public have only adumbrated news reports to go on. I think there is a real need for the Home Office, the courts and tribunals to make sure the reasons for their decisions are widely available. Sad to say we can't rely on news reportst to be free of bias these days, I suspect the wets have ignored those who are guilty of very serious crimes ......... Errm......one was done for a speeding offence. Hardly "very serious crime" and definitely not in the realms of rape. *-) Given you keep banging on and on and on and on about David's supposed illegal overstay in Spain I'd say you are a hypocrite amongst other things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 antony1969 - 2019-02-04 3:51 PM I'd say you are a hypocrite amongst other things I'm beginning to think that you are a parody account? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 antony1969 - 2019-02-04 3:51 PM Bulletguy - 2019-02-04 3:43 PM pelmetman - 2019-02-04 8:44 AM Violet1956 - 2019-02-03 11:15 PM Perhaps there needs to me more transparency regarding the deportation decisions made in each of their cases BG. So far you and I and the rest of Joe public have only adumbrated news reports to go on. I think there is a real need for the Home Office, the courts and tribunals to make sure the reasons for their decisions are widely available. Sad to say we can't rely on news reportst to be free of bias these days, I suspect the wets have ignored those who are guilty of very serious crimes ......... Errm......one was done for a speeding offence. Hardly "very serious crime" and definitely not in the realms of rape. *-) Given you keep banging on and on and on and on about David's supposed illegal overstay in Spain I'd say you are a hypocrite amongst other things Que? :-| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.