Guest pelmetman Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 >:-) .......... "What a welcome! Labour activists tell Tory defector Christian Wakeford they want a by-election - and THEY will decide if he can stand" https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10424959/What-welcome-Labour-activists-tell-Tory-defector-Christian-Wakeford-want-election.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Is it even worth commenting on a Daily Mail Story :-S I'm trying to match Brian Kirby's patience so I'll try again How many more lies would the Daily Mail have to print before you stop quoting them as a reliable source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted January 21, 2022 Share Posted January 21, 2022 Is it even worth commenting on a Daily Mail Story :-S I'm trying to match Brian Kirby's patience so I'll try again How many more lies would the Daily Mail have to print before you stop quoting them as a reliable source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted January 22, 2022 Share Posted January 22, 2022 Dave - The answer should be number. Since you won't answer that one does that mean there is no number - however many more lies the Daily Mail print you will still quote them as a reliable source? I'll try another then Isn't it inevitable the Tory press will be digging around for any tittle-tattle to try to smear him to distract from the reasons he resigned? Any functions he attended that they could infer were parties etc? The very reason I am reluctantly against identity cards because all the information would be held by this corrupt Government who could misuse it) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted January 23, 2022 Share Posted January 23, 2022 So we have evidence of a budding dictator at the top of Government using bribery, threats and intimidation - to get people to cover up his corruption, lies and hypocrisy, and vote for him. Have you anything to say about that? (PS... other than a Daily Mail ad hominem job to change the subject to try and dig the dirt on the insignificant messenger and smear him with tittle tattle >:-) ) Looks like the Daily Mail has had a look at Starmer, decided he is more likely than Johnson to make £billionaires domiciled in Her Majesty's tax havens pay tax, so decided they will stick with Johnson >:-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.