Jump to content

How Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG Got Away With It


Guest Peter James

Recommended Posts

Guest Peter James
You won't hear it on the BBC of course, but foreign and independent media is awash with allegations of Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG supplying the missing children from the Jersey home to alleged pedophile and child murderer Sir Edward Heath KG MBE - link: http://www.mk.gowebs.co.uk/index.php/uk-history/99-sensational-expose-savile-ted-heath-pedophillia
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter James - 2014-11-09 8:14 PM

 

You won't hear it on the BBC of course, but foreign and independent media is awash with allegations of Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG supplying the missing children from the Jersey home to alleged pedophile and child murderer Sir Edward Heath KG MBE - link: http://www.mk.gowebs.co.uk/index.php/uk-history/99-sensational-expose-savile-ted-heath-pedophillia

 

Oh C'mon Peter! They've got David Icke's name in the first sentence -- that gurantees that this is a load of old conspiracy-theory tosh! -- Utter Tosh! No sensible person is going to believe this, surely?

The usual 'hang it all together with some known facts to glue the unproven accusations together' just won't do -- they'll have to try harder than this. The pity is that it will 'muddy the waters' for Savile's real victims.

 

Colin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Had Enough

Oh yes, that nutter Michael Shrimpton, who tried to convince the police that a stolen German U-boat was going to sail up the Thames and detonate a Russian nuclear warhead during the Olympics.

 

That nutter Michael Shrimpton who claims that Madeleine McCann was murdered on the orders of German Intelligence!

 

http://goo.gl/sEjrNR

 

Still, it gives our own resident nutter the opportunity to mention Sir James Savile OBE KCSG, with whose styles and titles he seems even more obsessed than with 'the unelected queen'.

 

Anyway, it's all bollox as everyone knows that it's large green lizards who run things on earth and nothing happens without their authority.

 

Oh my God, I've just realised, Ted Heath was probably one of those lizards! That's how he got away with murmuring lots of children. Are we sure that he didn't eat them instead of dumping them in the sea?

 

 

:D :D :D It would be funny if it wasn't so sad. Poor dears. *-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Peter James
The last 2 posts have not offered any other explanation as to how Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG got away with so much, for so long.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter James - 2014-11-09 10:35 PM

 

The last 2 posts have not offered any other explanation as to how Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG got away with so much, for so long.

 

Simple. He was in a job where for the major part of his career, girls would fling themselves at him.....just as they would any "celeb". Didn't matter that he was much older or 'looked weird'. The fact he was a "celeb" and they could tell their friends they 'knew' him...that was enough.

 

Plus don't forget what we find unacceptable today back in the 60's/70's and even as late as the 80's was 'the norm' (apart from Paedophilia). Certainly young teenage girls would hang around. Where else do you think the term "groupies" came from? It wasn't boys. They were young girls who would do anything to share a bed with a "celeb".

 

By the late 60's Savile was well established in the higher ranks of the BBC. Those that knew of his predilections were undoubtedly not "important" enough for anyone to take notice of or believe. Some may well not even have believed the stories themselves either.

 

Take his charity fund raising, his work at Hospitals and Broadmoor and add that to his entire history and that should go some way to explaining "how he got away with it for so long".

 

Now.....Savile is dead so no amount of shouting or anything is going to do much. No good shutting the gate after the horse has bolted.

 

What folk should be paying a lot more attention to is the current Rotherham case which has now spread out to Manchester, and be asking questions where this file of names given to Leon Brittan back in 1984 has "disappeared" to and more importantly, why.

 

That hasn't "disappeared" simply because a couple of BBC DJ's names might have been on it. They are just small fry.

 

I'm talking very senior figures of the Establishment. So called 'Pillars of Society'.

 

Start at the very top......then work down. That's the way that inquiry should be going.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Peter James
Had Enough - 2014-11-09 10:41 PM

 

http://goo.gl/OGxWu3

 

Unless of course he was one of the shape-shifting green lizards who secretly run the world.

 

*-)

 

I dont disagree with any of that. So much for 'Freedom of Speech' and the 'Free Press' our soldiers died for when those with deep pockets and Royal connections can buy immunity from it. The half million pounds damages awarded to Lord Archer (plus legal costs, probably about £8 million in today's money) just for suggesting he gave money to a working girl (which turned out to be true) was a warning to the so called 'free press'

But the explanation of why Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG got away with so much for so long can be summed up by what he said himself: 'If I go down, I'll take some of them down with me'

(.. and some of them are are not dead Bulletguy. )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had Enough - 2014-11-09 10:19 PM

Oh my God, I've just realised, Ted Heath.................. That's how he got away with murmuring lots of children.

(?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?) (?)

 

:D

 

The green lizards have got to you too Frank! Sorry, couldn't ignore that typo!

 

Colin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter James - 2014-11-10 7:57 AM

 

But the explanation of why Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG got away with so much for so long can be summed up by what he said himself: 'If I go down, I'll take some of them down with me'

(.. and some of them are are not dead Bulletguy. )

 

 

Correct some are not but your opening post only referred to two people......both of whom are dead. You then asked "how did Savile get away with it for so long" to which i gave a clear opinion on "how".. Even your thread title refers only to Savile.

 

So......would you prefer the authorities waste time chasing up skeletons in the cupboards of dead men who are not here to answer any allegations.....or would time be better spent pursuing the line i suggested in the previous post?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Peter James
Bulletguy - 2014-11-10 10:07 PM

...would you prefer the authorities waste time chasing up skeletons in the cupboards of dead men who are not here to answer any allegations....

 

 

It might show up who else was involved, how they got knighthoods when others were being sent to prison just for looking at images. Nothing much seems to have changed since this was written 12 years ago: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/may/28/childprotection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter James - 2014-11-11 9:27 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2014-11-10 10:07 PM

...would you prefer the authorities waste time chasing up skeletons in the cupboards of dead men who are not here to answer any allegations....

 

 

It might show up who else was involved, how they got knighthoods when others were being sent to prison just for looking at images. Nothing much seems to have changed since this was written 12 years ago: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/may/28/childprotection

 

 

Chasing dead peoples 'skeletons' serves very little useful purpose. Savile is no longer here to answer any allegations so anyone can accuse him of anything which takes their fancy.

 

Forget about how 'they' got Knighthoods and think more about the people who put them forward and you'd be closer to getting at the truth. A tin badge 'buys' a lot of silence.

 

Anyway many senior figures of the Establishment can now rest easy as a report investigating alleged cover up of child abuse by the Home Office in the 80's has returned a verdict of "not proven", though Theresa May has just said in Parliament "there might have been". In other words Government will continue to drag this out until it loses momentum and eventually gets swept under the carpet.

 

Meantime the authorities will continue to bang folk in prison for reasons you mentioned above.......it's a soft and easy target which appeases the naive who live on a daily diet of Paedo Paranoia and Sex Scandals from the Daily Sleaze. More importantly, it diverts 'unwelcome' attention away from the real 'players'.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/11/child-abuse-claims-wanless-home-office

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11222423/Wanless-review-Home-Office-child-sex-abuse-report-published.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Peter James
Bulletguy - 2014-11-11 3:50 PM

 

Peter James - 2014-11-11 9:27 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2014-11-10 10:07 PM

...would you prefer the authorities waste time chasing up skeletons in the cupboards of dead men who are not here to answer any allegations....

 

 

It might show up who else was involved, how they got knighthoods when others were being sent to prison just for looking at images. Nothing much seems to have changed since this was written 12 years ago: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/may/28/childprotection

 

 

Chasing dead peoples 'skeletons' serves very little useful purpose. Savile is no longer here to answer any allegations so anyone can accuse him of anything which takes their fancy.

 

Forget about how 'they' got Knighthoods and think more about the people who put them forward and you'd be closer to getting at the truth. A tin badge 'buys' a lot of silence.

 

Anyway many senior figures of the Establishment can now rest easy as a report investigating alleged cover up of child abuse by the Home Office in the 80's has returned a verdict of "not proven", though Theresa May has just said in Parliament "there might have been". In other words Government will continue to drag this out until it loses momentum and eventually gets swept under the carpet.

 

Meantime the authorities will continue to bang folk in prison for reasons you mentioned above.......it's a soft and easy target which appeases the naive who live on a daily diet of Paedo Paranoia and Sex Scandals from the Daily Sleaze. More importantly, it diverts 'unwelcome' attention away from the real 'players'.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/nov/11/child-abuse-claims-wanless-home-office

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11222423/Wanless-review-Home-Office-child-sex-abuse-report-published.html

 

Very True. Just like there are far more convictions for Parking and Speeding than there are for Dangerous Driving, because its easier to detect and prove. This is what makes me cringe when I hear

politicians making populist speeches calling for tougher sentences. I suspect the ones who will bear the brunt of the tougher sentences will be mostly the ones just downloading photographs. Wheras many of those abusing children will continue to get away with it :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Peter James
Symbol Owner - 2014-11-14 8:07 PM

 

OO'ER!!

Perhaps, Peter, your OTT source was on to something after all, see here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30052726

 

Sometimes truth can be stranger than fiction/speculation -- I wonder if it will come out after all these years?

 

Colin.

 

These rumours have been circulating on the internet for over a year, so the British Establishment can't hush them up any longer, like they have done with MPs expense fiddles etc. I suspect this is one of the reasons they are so keen to censor the internet.

There are many more like you who will only believe it when they see it in the British Establishment controlled media, even though they have failed us so many times in the past like with Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG

Tory MP 'murdered' boy at orgy, abuse victim claims ....... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11234001/Tory-MP-murdered-boy-at-orgy-abuse-victim-claims.html - These are people who want to censor the internet under the guise of protecting us from child porn *-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest pelmetman
Peter James - 2014-11-17 9:06 AM

 

Symbol Owner - 2014-11-14 8:07 PM

 

OO'ER!!

Perhaps, Peter, your OTT source was on to something after all, see here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30052726

 

Sometimes truth can be stranger than fiction/speculation -- I wonder if it will come out after all these years?

 

Colin.

 

These rumours have been circulating on the internet for over a year, so the British Establishment can't hush them up any longer, like they have done with MPs expense fiddles etc. I suspect this is one of the reasons they are so keen to censor the internet.

There are many more like you who will only believe it when they see it in the British Establishment controlled media, even though they have failed us so many times in the past like with Sir Jimmy Savile OBE KCSG

Tory MP 'murdered' boy at orgy, abuse victim claims ....... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11234001/Tory-MP-murdered-boy-at-orgy-abuse-victim-claims.html - These are people who want to censor the internet under the guise of protecting us from child porn *-)

 

I suspect there's some members of the establishment having sleepless nights at the moment >:-) ...........

 

It'll be interesting to see how they hush this up *-) ................

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting stuff. Two issues stand out though for me, the boy was handed over to the group by his Father, and there were senior military and political figures present.

 

The boy who is now in his 40's would have been, what, aged 10 - 15? How would he have known who was who?

 

As for being "handed over", well, really?

 

Just a few thoughts 8-)

 

Martyn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Peter James
LordThornber - 2014-11-17 11:34 AM

 

The boy who is now in his 40's would have been, what, aged 10 - 15? How would he have known who was who?

 

The allegation is that they were very senior politicians who would have been recognized. Thats why their victims had to die afterwards. Over 10,000 people disappear from Britain every year, but the hugely disproportionate resources poured into looking for one of them (Madeline Mc Cann) seems to have given people the idea that they would have heard of every one.

 

LordThornber - 2014-11-17 11:34 AM

As for being "handed over", well, really?

Martyn

 

They don't think like we do Martyn. Fred West apparently 'handed over' his children to Pedophiles. :-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...