Birdbrain Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 ... Old poopy Irish pants Biden is angry about young Kyle ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-59356081 ... Great result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted November 20, 2021 Share Posted November 20, 2021 Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Because if he had been black he would have gone to jail. You dont find it somewhat disturbing that a 17 year old can go out with a semi Automatic rifle in the first place supposedly to defend a car dealership? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colin Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Maybe we should adopt the same laws as Wisconsin, it would allow mosques to have armed guards outside during marches, and hostel owners could arm themselves against intruders, if they feel under threat they could shoot to kill, after all what could go wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 Barryd999 - 2021-11-21 8:53 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Because if he had been black he would have gone to jail. You dont find it somewhat disturbing that a 17 year old can go out with a semi Automatic rifle in the first place supposedly to defend a car dealership? You like to live in pretend world quite a lot using 'if he/she were black/white' without ever providing anything other than your own bitterness to prove your claims, prove your claim??? ... I find it disturbing anyone would want to use a semi automatic or a knife, bomb, suicide vest, machete etc etc to defend anything but what I find disturbing might not disturb others Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:02 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? I didn't suggest it was about skin colour, you rather shamefully did ... You were wrong and I am sure you will apologise and then we can maybe move on and discuss Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves How can you promote the idea of Cruella Patel as PM and then go onto ramble on about Stop Funding Hate in the same post? 8-) Good lord! That woman wrote the rule book on "Hate". Cruella for PM? Jeesaz I thought things were bad with Johnson but her? I cant believe I am saying this but I think I would rather have Johnson. 8-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 1:06 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:02 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? I didn't suggest it was about skin colour, you rather shamefully did ... You were wrong and I am sure you will apologise and then we can maybe move on and discuss So then, enlighten us all as to why you accept the verdict of one jury but not the other? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 Barryd999 - 2021-11-21 1:28 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves How can you promote the idea of Cruella Patel as PM and then go onto ramble on about Stop Funding Hate in the same post? 8-) Good lord! That woman wrote the rule book on "Hate". Cruella for PM? Jeesaz I thought things were bad with Johnson but her? I cant believe I am saying this but I think I would rather have Johnson. 8-) "but I think" ... The worlds a better place when you dont "think" Barry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:29 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 1:06 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:02 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? I didn't suggest it was about skin colour, you rather shamefully did ... You were wrong and I am sure you will apologise and then we can maybe move on and discuss So then, enlighten us all as to why you accept the verdict of one jury but not the other? Is that your apology??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 3:21 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:29 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 1:06 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:02 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? I didn't suggest it was about skin colour, you rather shamefully did ... You were wrong and I am sure you will apologise and then we can maybe move on and discuss So then, enlighten us all as to why you accept the verdict of one jury but not the other? Is that your apology??? Nope, it's a question. Which yet again you have failed to answer. Two verdicts, one acceptable to you as correct, one which you question. So set out your rationale as to why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 4:50 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 3:21 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:29 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 1:06 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:02 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? I didn't suggest it was about skin colour, you rather shamefully did ... You were wrong and I am sure you will apologise and then we can maybe move on and discuss So then, enlighten us all as to why you accept the verdict of one jury but not the other? Is that your apology??? Nope, it's a question. Which yet again you have failed to answer. Two verdicts, one acceptable to you as correct, one which you question. So set out your rationale as to why. Mmmm ... My reply to you some posts back asking for a simple apology to your disgraceful race hate guff said quite clearly I was happy to discuss your concerns once youve made that public apology ... Up to this moment we still wait for your apology ... Stop Funding Hate must be proud of your funding Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted November 21, 2021 Share Posted November 21, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 5:21 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 4:50 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 3:21 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:29 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 1:06 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:02 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? I didn't suggest it was about skin colour, you rather shamefully did ... You were wrong and I am sure you will apologise and then we can maybe move on and discuss So then, enlighten us all as to why you accept the verdict of one jury but not the other? Is that your apology??? Nope, it's a question. Which yet again you have failed to answer. Two verdicts, one acceptable to you as correct, one which you question. So set out your rationale as to why. Mmmm ... My reply to you some posts back asking for a simple apology to your disgraceful race hate guff said quite clearly I was happy to discuss your concerns once youve made that public apology ... Up to this moment we still wait for your apology ... Stop Funding Hate must be proud of your funding There was no "race hate guff", I initially asked "Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other?", a question you have now failed to answer despite multiple opportunities. So I think we can leave this here and people can draw their own conclusions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 21, 2021 Author Share Posted November 21, 2021 CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 5:53 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 5:21 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 4:50 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 3:21 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:29 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 1:06 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 1:02 PM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 12:51 PM CurtainRaiser - 2021-11-21 9:37 AM Birdbrain - 2021-11-21 7:19 AM Barryd999 - 2021-11-20 12:31 PM Good job he was white though eh? You have to wonder though, just how messed up a country is where a 17 year old kid can choose to go down town where there is civil unrest with a semi automatic weapon legally. Seems he needed the gun, he legally defended himself from BLM nut jobs ... Some folk find "civil unrest" "funny" no they find it "very funny" ... Whats his skin colour got to do with anything??? Quite a lot when we look at your reaction to two different court cases where people of different colour were found not guilty by the court. In this case you agree with the verdict, the accused being white. But in the case of Begum, you appear to be unwilling to accept the courts verdict declaring that " .... What do you wanna princess ... She's guilty as sin". Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other? Last time I looked Mrs Begum had the same skin colour as the woman who I would like to be Tory Party leader and our PM so just what your silly point is only you knows ... You claim to fund Stop Funding Hate ... If all those who fund and support SFH have your standards they need to take a long hard look at themselves Nice bit of whataboutery. Now answer the question, if its not about skin colour as you suggest, why do you accept the verdict of one jury but not another? I didn't suggest it was about skin colour, you rather shamefully did ... You were wrong and I am sure you will apologise and then we can maybe move on and discuss So then, enlighten us all as to why you accept the verdict of one jury but not the other? Is that your apology??? Nope, it's a question. Which yet again you have failed to answer. Two verdicts, one acceptable to you as correct, one which you question. So set out your rationale as to why. Mmmm ... My reply to you some posts back asking for a simple apology to your disgraceful race hate guff said quite clearly I was happy to discuss your concerns once youve made that public apology ... Up to this moment we still wait for your apology ... Stop Funding Hate must be proud of your funding There was no "race hate guff", I initially asked "Might there be a reason other than the colour of someones skin as to why you take two verdicts and accept one but seek to rubbish the other?", a question you have now failed to answer despite multiple opportunities. So I think we can leave this here and people can draw their own conclusions. "There was no race hate guff" but you instantly brought up race??? ... Chuckle ... Just apologise because I cant wait to explain everything you for some reason need to know ... Your standing in your own way ... Again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted November 22, 2021 Author Share Posted November 22, 2021 A BLM nut job has driven through a Christmas Day parade in what is being seen as revenge for Kyle walking free ... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10228131/Multiple-people-injured-car-plows-crowd-Wisconsin-Christmas-parade.html ... Shocking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted November 22, 2021 Share Posted November 22, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-11-22 6:10 AM A BLM nut job has driven through a Christmas Day parade in what is being seen as revenge for Kyle walking free ... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10228131/Multiple-people-injured-car-plows-crowd-Wisconsin-Christmas-parade.html ... Shocking No, I see no mention of a "BLM nutjob" mentioned in the Wail article, I see a weak suggestion that because its 55 miles from the Rittenhouse incident there MAY be a link and forum member with a furtive imagination desperate to scream its BLM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.