Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Ian Naude, 30, who was working as a student officer for Cheshire police at the time of the assault in October 2017, was described during the two-week trial as a “selfish and cruel paedophile” who joined the force with the intention of meeting vulnerable victims. He started working for the police in April 2017, despite being named as a suspect in a child grooming case by a neighbouring force in the months leading up to his appointment, it has emerged. Staggering. 8-) https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/ian-naude-cheshire-police-rape-2222785 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/nov/15/police-officer-who-raped-girl-13-joined-force-to-identify-victims Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know ... Tell you what is "staggering" though that thankfully this poor young girl was believed when she reported the offences to this monsters colleagues ... Its "staggering" that cops took this seriously and thankfully dealt with this pervert and yet its "staggering" that they didn't act on what could be thousands of similar under age girls claims of sexual abuse when they reported it ... Wonder what the difference was in all those other cases ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Those that supported em I would imagine are now quite old but I dont want to stereotype those who support them like you do with "little Englander" Brexit voters but I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Those that supported em didn't go away did they just grew old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Then why didn't you state PIE instead of beating around the bush with nonsensical remarks? Thatcher blocked the naming of Sir Peter Hayman who was a PIE member and known paedophile. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Well thats your imagination *-) But what of reality. The worst one I can think of was Fred West, Married with children, Popular, several girlfriends, and fathered 44 children. Statistically abusers are most likely to be known to the child, and statistically most likely to be their own father. The one we are talking about is a long way from your imagination too. So try and put your imagination aside and look at reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 John52 - 2018-11-15 6:33 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Well thats your imagination *-) But what of reality. The worst one I can think of was Fred West, Married with children, Popular, several girlfriends, and fathered 44 children. Statistically abusers are most likely to be known to the child, and statistically most likely to be their own father. The one we are talking about is a long way from your imagination too. So try and put your imagination aside and look at reality. Dum-dum Fred West was a rapist and pedophile not someone who defended pervets unless you can show otherwise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:26 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Then why didn't you state PIE instead of beating around the bush with nonsensical remarks? Thatcher blocked the naming of Sir Peter Hayman who was a PIE member and known paedophile. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Which remark was "nonsensical" ??? Please show ... Nice to see as usual you've politicised sumat that didn't need politicising ... Mind you have plenty previous on that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 John52 - 2018-11-15 6:33 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Well thats your imagination *-) But what of reality. The worst one I can think of was Fred West, Married with children, Popular, several girlfriends, and fathered 44 children. Statistically abusers are most likely to be known to the child, and statistically most likely to be their own father. The one we are talking about is a long way from your imagination too. So try and put your imagination aside and look at reality. Quite. Also Brady and Hindley who were younger still at just 28 and 24 respectively at the time of their trial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:42 PM John52 - 2018-11-15 6:33 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Well thats your imagination *-) But what of reality. The worst one I can think of was Fred West, Married with children, Popular, several girlfriends, and fathered 44 children. Statistically abusers are most likely to be known to the child, and statistically most likely to be their own father. The one we are talking about is a long way from your imagination too. So try and put your imagination aside and look at reality. Quite. Also Brady and Hindley who were younger still at just 28 and 24 respectively at the time of their trial. Dum-dum 2 ... Weren't we talking about those who defend perverts not those who do the wicked perverted act ... Ding--a-ling old man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:38 PM Fred West was a rapist and pedophile ....... Exactly and the polar opposite of what you imagine a pedophile to be. So your imagination is exxtremely unhelpful as it diverts attention away from the most likely suspects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 John52 - 2018-11-15 6:49 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:38 PM Fred West was a rapist and pedophile ....... Exactly and the polar opposite of what you imagine a pedophile to be. So your imagination is exxtremely unhelpful as it diverts attention away from the most likely suspects. You need to take deep breaths fella ... Read the thread instead of jumping in with your size 9's on ... A defender of perverts doesnt mean that defender is a pedophile does it ??? just as a defender of Islam isnt necessarily a Muslim or am I wrong ... In your haste to attack me personally your mistaking pervert attackers and pervert defenders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:40 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:26 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Then why didn't you state PIE instead of beating around the bush with nonsensical remarks? Thatcher blocked the naming of Sir Peter Hayman who was a PIE member and known paedophile. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Which remark was "nonsensical" ??? Please show ... Sarcasm about 'older males living alone' which you (wrongly) perceive to be 'shunned by their family'. I've read those 'digs' from you before and fully aware you're personally directing them at me in your usual nastiness which you don't need try hard at as it comes natural to you. Nice to see as usual you've politicised sumat that didn't need politicising ... Mind you have plenty previous on that And why would it "not need politicising"? Purely because Thatcher was a Tory PM or can you fudge up some other excuse to deflect away from that? Fwiw i'd post the same had it been a Labour PM who'd blocked it. You originally said, "How anyone defends perverts I'll never know" I've just shown you an example of one that did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:58 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:40 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:26 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Then why didn't you state PIE instead of beating around the bush with nonsensical remarks? Thatcher blocked the naming of Sir Peter Hayman who was a PIE member and known paedophile. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Which remark was "nonsensical" ??? Please show ... Sarcasm about 'older males living alone' which you (wrongly) perceive to be 'shunned by their family'. I've read those 'digs' from you before and fully aware you're personally directing them at me in your usual nastiness which you don't need try hard at as it comes natural to you. Nice to see as usual you've politicised sumat that didn't need politicising ... Mind you have plenty previous on that And why would it "not need politicising"? Purely because Thatcher was a Tory PM or can you fudge up some other excuse to deflect away from that? Fwiw i'd post the same had it been a Labour PM who'd blocked it. You originally said, "How anyone defends perverts I'll never know" I've just shown you an example of one that did. You obviously have a complex problem ... I haven't mentioned you or insinuated it was you have I but if you feel you need to wear the cap then wear it fella , your choice ... You haven't shown anything by the way as your Guardian link doesnt work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:42 PM John52 - 2018-11-15 6:33 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Well thats your imagination *-) But what of reality. The worst one I can think of was Fred West, Married with children, Popular, several girlfriends, and fathered 44 children. Statistically abusers are most likely to be known to the child, and statistically most likely to be their own father. The one we are talking about is a long way from your imagination too. So try and put your imagination aside and look at reality. Quite. Also Brady and Hindley who were younger still at just 28 and 24 respectively at the time of their trial. Dum-dum 2 ... Weren't we talking about those who defend perverts not those who do the wicked perverted act ... Ding--a-ling old man Which you were given an example of but didn't like and spat your dummy out. Unless you believe covering up isn't defending? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 7:02 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:58 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:40 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:26 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Then why didn't you state PIE instead of beating around the bush with nonsensical remarks? Thatcher blocked the naming of Sir Peter Hayman who was a PIE member and known paedophile. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Which remark was "nonsensical" ??? Please show ... Sarcasm about 'older males living alone' which you (wrongly) perceive to be 'shunned by their family'. I've read those 'digs' from you before and fully aware you're personally directing them at me in your usual nastiness which you don't need try hard at as it comes natural to you. Nice to see as usual you've politicised sumat that didn't need politicising ... Mind you have plenty previous on that And why would it "not need politicising"? Purely because Thatcher was a Tory PM or can you fudge up some other excuse to deflect away from that? Fwiw i'd post the same had it been a Labour PM who'd blocked it. You originally said, "How anyone defends perverts I'll never know" I've just shown you an example of one that did. You obviously have a complex problem ... I haven't mentioned you or insinuated it was you have I but if you feel you need to wear the cap then wear it fella , your choice ... You haven't shown anything by the way as your Guardian link doesnt work Your insinuations are quite clear. It's your well worn 'mo' when you've run out of race hate links to post up. The Guardian link opens perfectly fine. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Thatcher stopped Peter Hayman being named as paedophile-link civil servant Margaret Thatcher was adamant officials should not publicly name Sir Peter Hayman, a senior diplomat connected to a paedophile scandal, even after she had been fully briefed on his activities, examination of formerly secret papers released to the National Archives shows. The 37-page file includes numerous handwritten notes and annotations by the late Conservative prime minister. It also reveals that security services were not initially informed about Hayman’s proclivities, as a secretary forgot to pass on a message to the relevant official and police neglected to follow up the matter. The densely typed documents, which are available for view to the public for the first time on Tuesday, also describe how Hayman, who died in 1992, apparently arranged for “obscene correspondence” to be sent to the British high commission in Ottawa when he was the most senior diplomat there. A member of domestic staff at the mission was wrongly blamed at the time for the letters, which were sent to a false female name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 7:07 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:42 PM John52 - 2018-11-15 6:33 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Well thats your imagination *-) But what of reality. The worst one I can think of was Fred West, Married with children, Popular, several girlfriends, and fathered 44 children. Statistically abusers are most likely to be known to the child, and statistically most likely to be their own father. The one we are talking about is a long way from your imagination too. So try and put your imagination aside and look at reality. Quite. Also Brady and Hindley who were younger still at just 28 and 24 respectively at the time of their trial. Dum-dum 2 ... Weren't we talking about those who defend perverts not those who do the wicked perverted act ... Ding--a-ling old man Which you were given an example of but didn't like and spat your dummy out. Unless you believe covering up isn't defending? Well if you post a link that works I might be able to answer with an informed opinion ... Thats not spitting your dummy out Princess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 7:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 7:02 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:58 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:40 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:26 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Then why didn't you state PIE instead of beating around the bush with nonsensical remarks? Thatcher blocked the naming of Sir Peter Hayman who was a PIE member and known paedophile. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Which remark was "nonsensical" ??? Please show ... Sarcasm about 'older males living alone' which you (wrongly) perceive to be 'shunned by their family'. I've read those 'digs' from you before and fully aware you're personally directing them at me in your usual nastiness which you don't need try hard at as it comes natural to you. Nice to see as usual you've politicised sumat that didn't need politicising ... Mind you have plenty previous on that And why would it "not need politicising"? Purely because Thatcher was a Tory PM or can you fudge up some other excuse to deflect away from that? Fwiw i'd post the same had it been a Labour PM who'd blocked it. You originally said, "How anyone defends perverts I'll never know" I've just shown you an example of one that did. You obviously have a complex problem ... I haven't mentioned you or insinuated it was you have I but if you feel you need to wear the cap then wear it fella , your choice ... You haven't shown anything by the way as your Guardian link doesnt work Your insinuations are quite clear. It's your well worn 'mo' when you've run out of race hate links to post up. The Guardian link opens perfectly fine. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Thatcher stopped Peter Hayman being named as paedophile-link civil servant Margaret Thatcher was adamant officials should not publicly name Sir Peter Hayman, a senior diplomat connected to a paedophile scandal, even after she had been fully briefed on his activities, examination of formerly secret papers released to the National Archives shows. The 37-page file includes numerous handwritten notes and annotations by the late Conservative prime minister. It also reveals that security services were not initially informed about Hayman’s proclivities, as a secretary forgot to pass on a message to the relevant official and police neglected to follow up the matter. The densely typed documents, which are available for view to the public for the first time on Tuesday, also describe how Hayman, who died in 1992, apparently arranged for “obscene correspondence” to be sent to the British high commission in Ottawa when he was the most senior diplomat there. A member of domestic staff at the mission was wrongly blamed at the time for the letters, which were sent to a false female name. Well you've promoted yourself to fit the profile I have given , thats your choice so shut up about it ... Have you any idea why Mrs Thatcher supposedly didn't want to publicly name Hayman or has your insinuation crazy mind just gone off into Bulletbrain World again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:57 PM John52 - 2018-11-15 6:49 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:38 PM Fred West was a rapist and pedophile ....... Exactly and the polar opposite of what you imagine a pedophile to be. So your imagination is exxtremely unhelpful as it diverts attention away from the most likely suspects. You need to take deep breaths fella ... Read the thread instead of jumping in with your size 9's on ... A defender of perverts doesnt mean that defender is a pedophile does it ??? just as a defender of Islam isnt necessarily a Muslim or am I wrong ... In your haste to attack me personally your mistaking pervert attackers and pervert defenders Size 12 actually so your wrong about that too. I suppose those with something to hide dare not be seen to be 'defending pervets' as you put it. Ian Huntley was out with the pedophile hunters berating perverts when he was the worst kind himself. Wheras those with nothing to hide and some courage might question where the resources are being directed.- at the risk of being accused of 'defending perverts' Since pedophilia is often within families and communities it can be hard to detect and prove. Wheras checking internet usage, seizing computers and proving possession of images is easy. I don't think anything has changed since this was written 16 years ago: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/may/28/childprotection Seems a poor substitute for catching those who abuse children Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted November 15, 2018 Author Share Posted November 15, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-11-15 7:14 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 7:07 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:42 PM John52 - 2018-11-15 6:33 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM I would imagine they would be older males living on their own , possibly shunned by their family ... Sumat like that ... Well thats your imagination *-) But what of reality. The worst one I can think of was Fred West, Married with children, Popular, several girlfriends, and fathered 44 children. Statistically abusers are most likely to be known to the child, and statistically most likely to be their own father. The one we are talking about is a long way from your imagination too. So try and put your imagination aside and look at reality. Quite. Also Brady and Hindley who were younger still at just 28 and 24 respectively at the time of their trial. Dum-dum 2 ... Weren't we talking about those who defend perverts not those who do the wicked perverted act ... Ding--a-ling old man Which you were given an example of but didn't like and spat your dummy out. Unless you believe covering up isn't defending? Well if you post a link that works I might be able to answer with an informed opinion ... Thats not spitting your dummy out Princess Posted twice now....but you claimed to be 'unable' to open it so i've pasted the first few paras. Try visualising the link being about a left wing politician and i'm sure you will quickly manage to open that. antony1969 - 2018-11-15 7:22 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 7:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 7:02 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:58 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:40 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 6:26 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 6:05 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:52 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:47 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:31 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:21 PM Bulletguy - 2018-11-15 5:13 PM antony1969 - 2018-11-15 5:00 PM Utter vile ... How anyone defends perverts I'll never know .. Who does? Anyone who defends perverts like I said previously ... How much clearer can I be I don't know of anyone who does......do you? Yes I do Which was why i asked you the initial question, "who does"? Your being silly ... Surely you remember these ... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26352378 ... Then why didn't you state PIE instead of beating around the bush with nonsensical remarks? Thatcher blocked the naming of Sir Peter Hayman who was a PIE member and known paedophile. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Which remark was "nonsensical" ??? Please show ... Sarcasm about 'older males living alone' which you (wrongly) perceive to be 'shunned by their family'. I've read those 'digs' from you before and fully aware you're personally directing them at me in your usual nastiness which you don't need try hard at as it comes natural to you. Nice to see as usual you've politicised sumat that didn't need politicising ... Mind you have plenty previous on that And why would it "not need politicising"? Purely because Thatcher was a Tory PM or can you fudge up some other excuse to deflect away from that? Fwiw i'd post the same had it been a Labour PM who'd blocked it. You originally said, "How anyone defends perverts I'll never know" I've just shown you an example of one that did. You obviously have a complex problem ... I haven't mentioned you or insinuated it was you have I but if you feel you need to wear the cap then wear it fella , your choice ... You haven't shown anything by the way as your Guardian link doesnt work Your insinuations are quite clear. It's your well worn 'mo' when you've run out of race hate links to post up. The Guardian link opens perfectly fine. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/02/thatcher-peter-hayman-named-paedophile-archives Thatcher stopped Peter Hayman being named as paedophile-link civil servant Margaret Thatcher was adamant officials should not publicly name Sir Peter Hayman, a senior diplomat connected to a paedophile scandal, even after she had been fully briefed on his activities, examination of formerly secret papers released to the National Archives shows. The 37-page file includes numerous handwritten notes and annotations by the late Conservative prime minister. It also reveals that security services were not initially informed about Hayman’s proclivities, as a secretary forgot to pass on a message to the relevant official and police neglected to follow up the matter. The densely typed documents, which are available for view to the public for the first time on Tuesday, also describe how Hayman, who died in 1992, apparently arranged for “obscene correspondence” to be sent to the British high commission in Ottawa when he was the most senior diplomat there. A member of domestic staff at the mission was wrongly blamed at the time for the letters, which were sent to a false female name. Well you've promoted yourself to fit the profile I have given , thats your choice so shut up about it ... Have you any idea why Mrs Thatcher supposedly didn't want to publicly name Hayman or has your insinuation crazy mind just gone off into Bulletbrain World again I do not "promote" myself to anything.....purely stating i'm more than familiar with the methodology of your snide insinuations which i find utterly repugnant. You can read up on the subject.....there's plenty about Hayman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted November 16, 2018 Share Posted November 16, 2018 Princess if your so insecure you believe I was on about you then that's your look out , I was merely trying to profile pervert defenders just like you profile thick "Little Englander" Brexit voters ... Once again your hypocrisy strikes and shows you can judge or pass comment on folk but others obviously can't as your mad rage takes over ... As for Hayman I presume by your half answer you have no knowledge for the reason Mrs Thatcher did as she did ... Brilliant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.