Jump to content

Increased Fuel & power


4petedaniel

Recommended Posts

davenewell@home - 2009-10-02 8:28 PM

 

Mel B - 2009-10-02 7:55 PM

 

davenewell@home - 2009-10-01 7:59 PM

 

Mel B - 2009-10-01 6:56 PM

 

Spec savers for you Dave or a new speedo for the van! 8-) :D ;-)

 

Not sure what you mean Mel, our Highwayman was easily capable of exceeding the national speed limit both on the speedo and on the sat nav speed readout. The 2.0 litre petrol engine was a good little unit giving about 84 BHP max in standard form on carburettor. Low down torque was always a bit uninspiring though which gave rise to the lack-lustre acceleration.

 

D.

 

You still need Spec savers Dave ... you missed the: ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) :D

 

No Mel, I saw the smiley but I still don't get the reference to Specsavers, probably me being dense again :-( .

 

D.

 

I was just pulling your leg chuck when I posted, hence the ;-) which I thought you'd missed seeing, hence the Spec Savers reference ... :->

 

Oh, bl**dy hell ... let's just have a row instead, much easier than trying to explain! There hasn't been a good old barny on here for a few days ... must be due one - do you want to start or shall I??? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tracker

No - because the only write ups that extol their virtues are advertising and all other reviews rate them as either a con or as useless.

 

Apart from ECU upgrades or rechipping which does seem to work according to friends who have had their van done and according to several reviews in several magazines - including MMM I believe - but am not totally sure - a few years back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Tracker
Mel B - 2009-10-03 8:32 PM

 

Maybe some of 'us' don't want to admit to buying them ..... :$

 

Why Mel? How much did you pay for your dose of snake oil then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rapido-lass - 2009-09-30 12:33 PM I've always held back as if they were that brilliant the base vehicle would be built with one already or the dealers would promote it.

The old adage "If it seems to good to be true, it probably is" !!!!!

No way will I even contemplate having my vehicle 'modified' by these re-mapping firms:-

a) It WILL affect your insurance

b) It WILL put additional strain on the engine componants

c) It WILL be impossible to claim any compensation if (b) above occurs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Losos - 2009-10-03 9:34 PM
Rapido-lass - 2009-09-30 12:33 PM I've always held back as if they were that brilliant the base vehicle would be built with one already or the dealers would promote it.

The old adage "If it seems to good to be true, it probably is" !!!!!

No way will I even contemplate having my vehicle 'modified' by these re-mapping firms:-

a) It WILL affect your insurance

b) It WILL put additional strain on the engine componants

c) It WILL be impossible to claim any compensation if (b) above occurs 

This, in my experience, is quite wrong. I have had two vehicles re-chipped and in both cases informed my insurer who didn't charge me an extra penny. Of course, if you're foolish enough to re-map your engine and don't tell your insurer you deserve everything that you get - or don't get as they case may be!

Manufacturers have to calibrate their engines assuming the worst possible scenario, such as cheap fuel and lack of proper servicing but, assuming that you are prepared to treat your engine properly, it can give you far more efficient output with specialist re-mapping.

I had mine fitted originally in order to be able to stay in top gear for as long as possible when using cruise control. A manual gearbox is not ideal for cruise control but I now need to change down less often when on a slope. I also get improved fuel consumption as I do not use the extra bhp to get more speed.

However, I do agree with those who say that magnets etc. are snake oil, as are most additives. 'Which' magazine has just conducted a thorough test of fuel additives and concluded that they are a waste of money. People who buy magnets and other con-tricks like this often report better mpg, but this doesn't last long. Having spent money on a device to guarantee better fuel consumption, one subconsciously wishes it to work in order to justify one's choice and the result is a more economical way of driving with a lighter left foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mel B - 2009-10-04 7:22 PM
emmbeedee - 2009-10-04 12:23 PM Gee! You have a left foot accelerator then, do you Rupert (?) (?) (?)
He's ambidextrous don'cha know! :D

I'm far from ambidextrous but, as my wife will tell you, I have two left feet and will never appear on 'Strictly Come Dancing'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...