Barryd999 Posted September 1, 2019 Author Share Posted September 1, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted September 1, 2019 Author Share Posted September 1, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 11:17 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. I'm trying to make this simple for you so I'll try again. I treat women just as I treat men. You appear to be in the '70s mode where they're the 'weaker sex' and should be protected from the vigorous debate we share. That really is sexist. You and others on here have talked about men 'cr@pping their pants'. As for Widdecombe your vile comments about her usually revolve around her sex. As for the police inside and in close proximity to No. 10, what the hell do you think they're there for, directing traffic? They didn't call in a bobby from the nearest nick. They asked an officer who was already inside to escort her out. Maybe he was there to do a bit of filing? For God's sake man, give up whilst you're losing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted September 1, 2019 Author Share Posted September 1, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:31 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 11:17 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. I'm trying to make this simple for you so I'll try again. I treat women just as I treat men. You appear to be in the '70s mode where they're the 'weaker sex' and should be protected from the vigorous debate we share. That really is sexist. You and others on here have talked about men 'cr@pping their pants'. As for Widdecombe your vile comments about her usually revolve around her sex. As for the police inside and in close proximity to No. 10, what the hell do you think they're there for, directing traffic? They didn't call in a bobby from the nearest nick. They asked an officer who was already inside to escort her out. Maybe he was there to do a bit of filing? For God's sake man, give up whilst you're losing. Its all about "winning" with you FunnyJohn isn't it? Did you go on Bullseye or summat in the 80s and hear those terrible words "Ave a look at what ya could ave won" and its scarred you for life that you could have been the proud owner of half a speed boat or a leaky old Swift Caravan? Must WIN Brexit!! Must be a WINNER! Must use the word LOSER a lot when spitting bile across the internet. As for Widdecombe if I have described her using "Vile" terms then thats probably because she is vile. Totally. She sounds like she is right up your alley though. A good match I reckon. Apparently she has never had sex so you could be the first and her yours probably. (lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 1:16 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:31 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 11:17 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. I'm trying to make this simple for you so I'll try again. I treat women just as I treat men. You appear to be in the '70s mode where they're the 'weaker sex' and should be protected from the vigorous debate we share. That really is sexist. You and others on here have talked about men 'cr@pping their pants'. As for Widdecombe your vile comments about her usually revolve around her sex. As for the police inside and in close proximity to No. 10, what the hell do you think they're there for, directing traffic? They didn't call in a bobby from the nearest nick. They asked an officer who was already inside to escort her out. Maybe he was there to do a bit of filing? For God's sake man, give up whilst you're losing. Its all about "winning" with you FunnyJohn isn't it? Did you go on Bullseye or summat in the 80s and hear those terrible words "Ave a look at what ya could ave won" and its scarred you for life that you could have been the proud owner of half a speed boat or a leaky old Swift Caravan? Must WIN Brexit!! Must be a WINNER! Must use the word LOSER a lot when spitting bile across the internet. As for Widdecombe if I have described her using "Vile" terms then thats probably because she is vile. Totally. She sounds like she is right up your alley though. A good match I reckon. Apparently she has never had sex so you could be the first and her yours probably. (lol) And there we have it. Widdecombe has never had sex. And you have the nerve to call me sexist. I don't normally revert to your foul mouthed diatribes but on this occasion I'll make an exception. You're a potty-mouthed, single-issue, brainwashed gobsh!te and a real sexist to boot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 9:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. It's a fetish of his. Probably collects 'em to play with. Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:17 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Incontinence....i expect Widders bloomers were the only time he ever got in any womans knickers. (lol) Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. I doubt the officer is who opens the door for Downing streets longest serving resident....Larry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted September 1, 2019 Author Share Posted September 1, 2019 FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 2:02 PM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 1:16 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:31 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 11:17 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. I'm trying to make this simple for you so I'll try again. I treat women just as I treat men. You appear to be in the '70s mode where they're the 'weaker sex' and should be protected from the vigorous debate we share. That really is sexist. You and others on here have talked about men 'cr@pping their pants'. As for Widdecombe your vile comments about her usually revolve around her sex. As for the police inside and in close proximity to No. 10, what the hell do you think they're there for, directing traffic? They didn't call in a bobby from the nearest nick. They asked an officer who was already inside to escort her out. Maybe he was there to do a bit of filing? For God's sake man, give up whilst you're losing. Its all about "winning" with you FunnyJohn isn't it? Did you go on Bullseye or summat in the 80s and hear those terrible words "Ave a look at what ya could ave won" and its scarred you for life that you could have been the proud owner of half a speed boat or a leaky old Swift Caravan? Must WIN Brexit!! Must be a WINNER! Must use the word LOSER a lot when spitting bile across the internet. As for Widdecombe if I have described her using "Vile" terms then thats probably because she is vile. Totally. She sounds like she is right up your alley though. A good match I reckon. Apparently she has never had sex so you could be the first and her yours probably. (lol) And there we have it. Widdecombe has never had sex. And you have the nerve to call me sexist. I don't normally revert to your foul mouthed diatribes but on this occasion I'll make an exception. You're a potty-mouthed, single-issue, brainwashed gobsh!te and a real sexy Rock God to boot. Yeah thats what all the chicks like about me. B-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunsterJohn Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 4:35 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 2:02 PM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 1:16 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:31 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 11:17 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. I'm trying to make this simple for you so I'll try again. I treat women just as I treat men. You appear to be in the '70s mode where they're the 'weaker sex' and should be protected from the vigorous debate we share. That really is sexist. You and others on here have talked about men 'cr@pping their pants'. As for Widdecombe your vile comments about her usually revolve around her sex. As for the police inside and in close proximity to No. 10, what the hell do you think they're there for, directing traffic? They didn't call in a bobby from the nearest nick. They asked an officer who was already inside to escort her out. Maybe he was there to do a bit of filing? For God's sake man, give up whilst you're losing. Its all about "winning" with you FunnyJohn isn't it? Did you go on Bullseye or summat in the 80s and hear those terrible words "Ave a look at what ya could ave won" and its scarred you for life that you could have been the proud owner of half a speed boat or a leaky old Swift Caravan? Must WIN Brexit!! Must be a WINNER! Must use the word LOSER a lot when spitting bile across the internet. As for Widdecombe if I have described her using "Vile" terms then thats probably because she is vile. Totally. She sounds like she is right up your alley though. A good match I reckon. Apparently she has never had sex so you could be the first and her yours probably. (lol) And there we have it. Widdecombe has never had sex. And you have the nerve to call me sexist. I don't normally revert to your foul mouthed diatribes but on this occasion I'll make an exception. You're a potty-mouthed, single-issue, brainwashed gobsh!te and a real sexy Rock God to boot. Yeah thats what all the chicks like about me. B-) I heard that you're unfit and grossly overweight and don't do too well in the hsndsomeness stakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teflon2 Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 3:35 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 2:02 PM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 1:16 PM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:31 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 11:17 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-09-01 10:04 AM Barryd999 - 2019-09-01 10:03 AM FunsterJohn - 2019-08-31 5:37 PM Barryd999 - 2019-08-31 6:00 PM So we can add sexism to the long list of wonderful 1970s values of "FunnyJohn". Well, if it gives you pleasure please do so. However that would really emphasise why I call you Thick Barry. You and I and others make scathing and sarcastic comments about lots of people. Suggesting that we should only be able to do this to men is very demeaning to women. It suggests that they're fragile and unable to cope with the stresses and strains of vigorous debate. That really is very sexist and '70s. Now, what were you saying about Anne Widdecombe? Haha! Another one skewered! I am going to cut you some slack as your clearly not of sane mind and probably typing this under supervision in your care home I imagine but WTF are you on about exactly? I suggested what exactly we should only be able to do to men? Anne Widdecombe? Maybe its me thats loosing my mind but perhaps you could enlighten me on that one as well. Skewered? How Bizarre. I think its medication time for you. You're really earning your nickname today! At least I can work out why policemen in No. 10 are armed. 'We're expecting an attack on the PM from terrorists, truncheons at the ready lads.' Now concentrate again - I had a dig at Ms Khan, you accused me of sexism, I explained that I have similar digs at men and to treat her differently really would be sexist. How are we doing so far? Not too complicated for you I hope? I mentioned Anne Widdecombe and thought you'd understand why, but you're being thick again. You accused me of sexism but you regularly make sexist remarks about her, such as crazy cat lady and mad bint etc. I'm not sure it was bint exactly but along those lines. So in simple terms, you've got a nerve calling me sexist. Get back if all that is still too complicated for you. Similar digs at men about wetting their knickers? Poor dear etc. What kind of Knickers do you wear FunnyJohn. Big Widdecombe bloomers or you into a bit of agent provocateur (you will probably have to google that). Is calling Anne Widdecombe "A mad old cat lady" sexist? Maybe referring to her knickers is I dunno but its clear your opinions on women are as archaic as the rest of your views on just about everything else. As for you "knowing" that ALL the coppers in and around number 10 are armed how do you know? I suspect some are like close protection officers but not all of them. I'm trying to make this simple for you so I'll try again. I treat women just as I treat men. You appear to be in the '70s mode where they're the 'weaker sex' and should be protected from the vigorous debate we share. That really is sexist. You and others on here have talked about men 'cr@pping their pants'. As for Widdecombe your vile comments about her usually revolve around her sex. As for the police inside and in close proximity to No. 10, what the hell do you think they're there for, directing traffic? They didn't call in a bobby from the nearest nick. They asked an officer who was already inside to escort her out. Maybe he was there to do a bit of filing? For God's sake man, give up whilst you're losing. Its all about "winning" with you FunnyJohn isn't it? Did you go on Bullseye or summat in the 80s and hear those terrible words "Ave a look at what ya could ave won" and its scarred you for life that you could have been the proud owner of half a speed boat or a leaky old Swift Caravan? Must WIN Brexit!! Must be a WINNER! Must use the word LOSER a lot when spitting bile across the internet. As for Widdecombe if I have described her using "Vile" terms then thats probably because she is vile. Totally. She sounds like she is right up your alley though. A good match I reckon. Apparently she has never had sex so you could be the first and her yours probably. (lol) And there we have it. Widdecombe has never had sex. And you have the nerve to call me sexist. I don't normally revert to your foul mouthed diatribes but on this occasion I'll make an exception. You're a potty-mouthed, single-issue, brainwashed gobsh!te and a real sexy Rock God to boot. Yeah thats what all the chicks like about me. B-) Are you meaning the time you went into the battery hen sheds. (lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-09-01 7:24 PM Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Interesting what he had to say back in 2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/what-does-a-one-nation-justice-policy-look-like Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 The appropriate link for this thread https://www.gov.uk/brexit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-09-01 7:24 PM Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Why should the government accept a Remoaner fabricated law, when the Remoaners can not accept the result of a democratic referendum? *-) ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-09-02 8:18 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-01 7:24 PM Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Why should the government accept a Remoaner fabricated law, when the Remoaners can not accept the result of a democratic referendum? *-) ........... So now you dont want parliamentary sovereignty? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-09-02 9:00 AM pelmetman - 2019-09-02 8:18 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-01 7:24 PM Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Why should the government accept a Remoaner fabricated law, when the Remoaners can not accept the result of a democratic referendum? *-) ........... So now you dont want parliamentary sovereignty? I want a Parliament that respects the vote of the majority ;-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Things that won't get you kicked out of Tory party: - lying to parliament - gross incompetence - using the n word - assaulting a peaceful protestor on camera - jacking off it at work - making derogatory dog whistle comments inciting race hatred Things that will get you kicked out: - voting against shortages of medicine and food Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Get Ready!!!.......... https://www.gov.uk/brexit?gclid=CjwKCAjw-7LrBRB6EiwAhh1yX0SKsW2sr0VAc6NxGsBh1brzNUkQSoQXzDWVfrShloBsySrrdgEmaRoCgMcQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds Brexiteers..........Have a party :D .......... Remoaners........Hide behind the Sofa (lol) (lol) (lol) ............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 And here you have it folks JRM on LBC this morning admitting that if there was another referendum Leave would lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-09-02 10:25 AM And here you have it folks JRM on LBC this morning admitting that if there was another referendum Leave would lose. Thanks for the heads up ;-) ........... Just listened to the whole interview and as per usual you Losers are up to your taking stuff out of context tricks *-) ........ Although I would urge folk to listen to the bit with Dr Nicol who was "apparently" involved in drafting up operation Yellowhammer >:-) ........... It's pretty obvious May's Remoaners drafted in every scaremonger they could find to compile it (lol) (lol) (lol) ........... Have to say I was well impressed how easily Moggy dispatched all the Remoaners B-) .........and curious as to why LBC only allows Remoaners to ask questions? :-| ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 https://twitter.com/UKDemockery/status/1168341507335708672 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-09-02 11:26 AM https://twitter.com/UKDemockery/status/1168341507335708672 You LOSERS really have got it bad :D ......... Cheer up.......... there's just 59 days until Armageddon >:-) ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-09-02 9:07 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-02 9:00 AM pelmetman - 2019-09-02 8:18 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-01 7:24 PM Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Why should the government accept a Remoaner fabricated law, when the Remoaners can not accept the result of a democratic referendum? *-) ........... So now you dont want parliamentary sovereignty? I want a Parliament that respects the vote of the majority ;-) .......... 37% of the electorate isn't a majority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Bulletguy - 2019-09-02 2:45 PM pelmetman - 2019-09-02 9:07 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-02 9:00 AM pelmetman - 2019-09-02 8:18 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-01 7:24 PM Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Why should the government accept a Remoaner fabricated law, when the Remoaners can not accept the result of a democratic referendum? *-) ........... So now you dont want parliamentary sovereignty? I want a Parliament that respects the vote of the majority ;-) .......... 37% of the electorate isn't a majority. It's the majority of those who bothered to vote >:-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-09-02 2:47 PM Bulletguy - 2019-09-02 2:45 PM pelmetman - 2019-09-02 9:07 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-02 9:00 AM pelmetman - 2019-09-02 8:18 AM Fast Pat - 2019-09-01 7:24 PM Gove is getting ready.... To break the law Why should the government accept a Remoaner fabricated law, when the Remoaners can not accept the result of a democratic referendum? *-) ........... So now you dont want parliamentary sovereignty? I want a Parliament that respects the vote of the majority ;-) .......... 37% of the electorate isn't a majority. It's the majority of those who bothered to vote >:-) .......... 37%......not 52%. And none of those 32% voted for 'no deal'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.