Guest starspirit Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Do women actually like men who are too idle to shave and put on a clean shirt and wear jeans that are not frayed and torn? Someone did a good job of selling the world abject laziness as fashion didn't they? Why is it that more often than not when you see a couple on TV the woman is usually clean, tidy and well turned out but her 'partner' is often unshaven with scruffy hair, a creased shirt, tatty jeans and worn out trainers? Now heaven knows I have no fashion sense whatsoever but I do at least wash, shave and put clean clothes on once a month - whether I need to or not. All part of the general reduction in personal standards and dumbing down of the nation I guess?
michele Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 No Rich you have it wrong, it's the women that like them to look shaggy You know the Diet Pepsi Advert ...The unshaved looked gives it a bit of ruggeredness. Is that how you spell it .
howie Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Nothing wrong with a bit of ruggeredness Richard as long as its within reason. I don,t mind slobbing out now and then, but I do shower at least once a month whether I need it or not.
Tony Jones Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Isn't ruggeredness how you look after playing rugger? (No offence Michele!)
Guest Frank Wilkinson Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Tony Jones - 2007-03-12 6:47 PM Isn't ruggeredness how you look after playing rugger? (No offence Michele!) Of course it's not! It's when you've been well and truly ruggered by some one! Or is it rogered? I can never remember!
howie Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Michele does have a way with words Tony, many of which are new to me as well. Often wonder if the adverts we see actually help sell their intended products. Some are amusing and others downright irritating, but seeing as we the consumers ultimatley pay for them I doubt manufacturers worry to much over the huge amounts they spend on them.
Guest peter Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Frank Wilkinson - 2007-03-12 7:12 PMTony Jones - 2007-03-12 6:47 PM Isn't ruggeredness how you look after playing rugger? (No offence Michele!) Of course it's not! It's when you've been well and truly ruggered by some one! Or is it rogered? I can never remember!I don't know Frank. I suppose it depends on which side you're batting for. :D
Guest starspirit Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 One of the few benefits of being single again is / was the opportunity to remember how to become ruggered again by experiencing some long forgotten ruggeredness skills. Bit like falling off a bike, was it the communal village bike, can't remember too many moons have passed - but some things stick in your memory init?
Mel B Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 It probably means that the 'rough looking' man in question is not shacked up with someone already so you are on to a safeish bet that he doesn't have a better half as she wouldn't let him be seen dead like that! Alternatively, it could be that women find this attractive 'cause if he ain't bothered then there's less work for her to do washing, ironing etc. (lol)
Guest Frank Wilkinson Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 peter - 2007-03-12 7:32 PM Frank Wilkinson - 2007-03-12 7:12 PM Tony Jones - 2007-03-12 6:47 PM Isn't ruggeredness how you look after playing rugger? (No offence Michele!) Of course it's not! It's when you've been well and truly ruggered by some one! Or is it rogered? I can never remember!I don't know Frank. I suppose it depends on which side you're batting for. :D I strongly resent the implication in this post and wish to state unequivocally that I am not gay. I just help them out when they're busy.
michele Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I just help them out when their busy (lol) (lol) (lol) ...... is that the new logo or a statement ..sorry can't tell as it 's at the bottom I am unsure if it relates to the Gay 's or your new saying ? :D
Millhey Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Can we please delete all references to the verb 'Roger'? It makes me embarrassed.
Millhey Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Thank you. It's better than being named Sue I suppose.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.