Guest pelmetman Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... So it's hardly surprising that he's adopbted your LOSER anti Boris mantra *-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. It's hardly the bastion or right wing journalism though. Try the Times, Telegraph, Observer etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 7, 2020 Share Posted October 7, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 5:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Yep......it means your no different to me when trying to score points :D ......... Except I don't wear frillies like you >:-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-08 6:00 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 5:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Yep......it means your no different to me when trying to score points :D ......... I don't need to 'score' any points against you as you do a cracking job of continually shooting yourself in the foot and digging yourself into a hole all the time. (lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol) You haven't explained how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative". How does what Bernstein and Woodard achieved fit a "loser narrative"? :-S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 6:00 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 5:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Yep......it means your no different to me when trying to score points :D ......... I don't need to 'score' any points against you as you do a cracking job of continually shooting yourself in the foot and digging yourself into a hole all the time. (lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol) You haven't explained how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative". How does what Bernstein and Woodard achieved fit a "loser narrative"? :-S Why would I want to read one of your links??? 8-) ......... I'm too busy having a life ;-) ........ You should try it whilst you still can :D ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-08 7:31 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 6:00 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 5:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Yep......it means your no different to me when trying to score points :D ......... I don't need to 'score' any points against you as you do a cracking job of continually shooting yourself in the foot and digging yourself into a hole all the time. (lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol) You haven't explained how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative". How does what Bernstein and Woodard achieved fit a "loser narrative"? :-S Why would I want to read one of your links??? 8-) ......... In other words you were spouting bollox as usual and don't even know anything about Bernstein and Woodward. *-) I'm too busy getting drunk and dreaming up the next fantasy. ;-) ........ We have noticed. :-| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:40 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 7:31 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 6:00 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 5:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Yep......it means your no different to me when trying to score points :D ......... I don't need to 'score' any points against you as you do a cracking job of continually shooting yourself in the foot and digging yourself into a hole all the time. (lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol) You haven't explained how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative". How does what Bernstein and Woodard achieved fit a "loser narrative"? :-S Why would I want to read one of your links??? 8-) ......... In other words you were spouting bollox as usual and don't even know anything about Bernstein and Woodward. *-) I'm too busy getting drunk and dreaming up the next fantasy. ;-) ........ We have noticed. :-| My fantasies are real ;-) ......... Unlike yours....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-08 7:43 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:40 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 7:31 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 6:00 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 5:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Yep......it means your no different to me when trying to score points :D ......... I don't need to 'score' any points against you as you do a cracking job of continually shooting yourself in the foot and digging yourself into a hole all the time. (lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol) You haven't explained how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative". How does what Bernstein and Woodard achieved fit a "loser narrative"? :-S Why would I want to read one of your links??? 8-) ......... In other words you were spouting bollox as usual and don't even know anything about Bernstein and Woodward. *-) I'm too busy getting drunk and dreaming up the next fantasy. ;-) ........ We have noticed. :-| My fantasies are real ;-) ......... Unlike yours....... No they are not. Everyone except you knows they're not. You said yesterday you could PROVE you had spent the £20k plus you claimed to have spent over the past seven months, but when asked to provide receipts (which is proof), you refused......because the reality is you couldn't because you make sh1te like this up all the time, often with some wild grossly exaggerated figures. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 8, 2020 Share Posted October 8, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:58 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 7:43 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:40 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 7:31 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 7:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 6:00 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 5:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 3:49 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-08 2:41 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-08 9:24 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 6:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:44 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:37 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:29 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 4:09 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 3:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-07 2:13 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-07 9:49 AM Barryd999 - 2020-10-06 6:33 PM More damming reports from respected financial law firm Baker & McKenzie. https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu-economy/covid-19-and-no-deal-brexit-could-cost-uk-134-billion-pounds-a-year-baker-mckenzie-idUKKBN26Q0G5?fbclid=IwAR3rx-X26SGpiifLj0B3S34lIG37LTvAJfAIRk3syLRoP-gypTuH4N4OTic The figures are utterly staggering. One things for sure looking at that the hopes of the Brexiteers thinking they could get away with blaming covid for it all going titties up next year are well and truly trounced. Besides I've heard that the Germans have deffo decided they need us more than we need them >:-) ....... https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/brexit/12849440/germany-needs-brexit-deal/ The Sun? 8-) *-) You've scraped the barrel in desperation. (lol)(lol) From a more credible sourced media; .....it would be dangerous and self-defeating to agree a Brexit deal that undermines the single market. As the Germans see it, allowing the UK tariff and quota-free access to that market — while exempting the country from the EU’s state-aid regulations and border controls — would pose an unacceptable threat to Europe’s legal order, prosperity and unity. There is also the question of trust. If Boris Johnson’s UK government rips up a deal agreed nine months ago, what is the point of negotiating any further with them? https://www.ft.com/content/e9b7b193-47d4-4887-abe1-2c12f344922a Oh I see your Loser media is more credible than my Brexiteer media?........... I have more faith in articles from the FT than the Brexit comics you turn to. You haven't got much left now as more right wing conservative media has finally woken up and turned against Johnson and his cronies after realising he's no leader and the worst PM this country has had. Woken up? :-S ......... The DM now has a well known Loser/Remoaner as editor ;-) ........... You're always posting DM links............as long as they're fitting your narrative. ......and you don't? 8-) .......... Rarely DM and the last time i used it was a report quoting Carl Bernstein whose views and tenacity as a US investigative reporter I hold in the highest esteem along with Bob Woodward, now both retired. Both widely respected for blowing wide open the corruption of the US Presidency back in '72-74 and getting rid of a bunch of crooks. So that's a YES that you use the DM :D .........and a YES that you use it to fit your narrative >:-) ....... RARELY means seldom or infrequently. I can't see what 'narrative' you think Bernstein fits that you don't like so you'll have to elaborate on that point. You post DM links REGULARLY which means often but only when the article is pro-Brexit and pro-Johnson or immigrant bashing. So that's STILL a Yes that you use the DM >:-) ......... Amongst other Loser media to fit your narrative........ It means exactly what i wrote......that you choose to take it entirely out of context so you can get yourself off and cream your frillies is your problem. *-) Explain how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative"......the losers were the crooks him and Woodward brought to account. Yep......it means your no different to me when trying to score points :D ......... I don't need to 'score' any points against you as you do a cracking job of continually shooting yourself in the foot and digging yourself into a hole all the time. (lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol)(lol) You haven't explained how an article concerning Bernstein fits a "loser narrative". How does what Bernstein and Woodard achieved fit a "loser narrative"? :-S Why would I want to read one of your links??? 8-) ......... In other words you were spouting bollox as usual and don't even know anything about Bernstein and Woodward. *-) I'm too busy getting drunk and dreaming up the next fantasy. ;-) ........ We have noticed. :-| My fantasies are real ;-) ......... Unlike yours....... No they are not. Everyone except you knows they're not. You said yesterday you could PROVE you had spent the £20k plus you claimed to have spent over the past seven months, but when asked to provide receipts (which is proof), you refused......because the reality is you couldn't because you make sh1te like this up all the time, often with some wild grossly exaggerated figures. *-) Yeah Dumb Dumb if you say so........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.