Jump to content

Ravenna on its way out ?


Kahloflow

Recommended Posts

Been doing a bit of investigation on a 2001 ravenna Peugeot 2.8 hdi via check the car.com ( a trusted source??)

 

The mot details over the last couple of year's are as follows:

 

advisory 2016

nearside front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)

 

25th June 2015 pass

19th June 2015 fail

Nearside Front Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)

 

Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)

 

MOT'S and house surveys ...I find hard

 

too costly to repair?

To many signs of it being a money pit in very near future?

I'm not sure what to make of this.. anyone ?

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on the cost of repairs and the value of the van.

 

Excessive corrosion is a subjective matter and sometimes it can look worse than it is so removal, cleaning and inspection would be my priority having first used the advisories to get the best price possible.

 

Any Autosleeper is generally well made internally and holds it's value well in the longer term and this may well be an opportunity to get a good van at a good price.

 

On the other hand it may be a rust bucket underneath and best avoided - only an inspection can tell.

 

Caveat emptor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...