Guest pelmetman Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 First the BBC....now the Guardian 8-) ...... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4388690/The-Guardian-ruined-vast-inherited-wealth.html The locals can expect the price of lentils to go through the roof.......and every bog to become gender neutral (lol) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers Well you could always chuck'em a donation John ;-) ...........But your right it still has a big readership "online"......Me for one, I like to keep abreast of what the loony left are up to :D ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-07 5:43 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... What "begging bowl"? :-S It's not gone subscription but don't be so naive to think your Beano rag will enjoy eternal exemption. It's circulation is only 7000 more than The Guardian so it's future is far from secure as more people turn to online news media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 6:31 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 5:43 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... What "begging bowl"? :-S It's not gone subscription but don't be so naive to think your Beano rag will enjoy eternal exemption. It's circulation is only 7000 more than The Guardian so it's future is far from secure as more people turn to online news media. Only 7000 more? 8-) ........What's 1,511,357 minus 156,756 ?......1,354,601 (lol) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation The only thing that surprises me is that there are 156,756 loony liberals prepared to buy the left wing rag >:-) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-07 7:12 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 6:31 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 5:43 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... What "begging bowl"? :-S It's not gone subscription but don't be so naive to think your Beano rag will enjoy eternal exemption. It's circulation is only 7000 more than The Guardian so it's future is far from secure as more people turn to online news media. Only 7000 more? 8-) ........What's 1,511,357 minus 156,756 ?......1,354,601 (lol) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation The only thing that surprises me is that there are 156,756 loony liberals prepared to buy the left wing rag >:-) .. A Wiki link.....lol......anyone can stick whatever figures they like on wiki! (lol) When i said 7000 i was being generous. It's actually 6,725. https://www.statista.com/statistics/246077/reach-of-selected-national-newspapers-in-the-uk/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Guardian chose not to have a paywall like the Torygraph (easily bypassed by deleting your cookies by the way, others can be bypassed by also going through google search) because they don't want to exclude the poor. Some newspapers have more readership than others, but that doesn't mean they are better newspapers does it? Years ago a TV producer put it something like this. No-one ever went bust by under-estimating public taste. We could produce a perfect opera and get an audience of 20 thousand. Or we could televise live birching from the Isle of Man and get an audience of 20 million :-S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 8:38 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 7:12 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 6:31 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 5:43 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... What "begging bowl"? :-S It's not gone subscription but don't be so naive to think your Beano rag will enjoy eternal exemption. It's circulation is only 7000 more than The Guardian so it's future is far from secure as more people turn to online news media. Only 7000 more? 8-) ........What's 1,511,357 minus 156,756 ?......1,354,601 (lol) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation The only thing that surprises me is that there are 156,756 loony liberals prepared to buy the left wing rag >:-) .. A Wiki link.....lol......anyone can stick whatever figures they like on wiki! (lol) When i said 7000 i was being generous. It's actually 6,725. https://www.statista.com/statistics/246077/reach-of-selected-national-newspapers-in-the-uk/ Your link includes those who read it online, which includes the likes of me who like a good laugh ;-) ......... The fact that only 150k people are prepared to "pay" to read it, compared to 1.5 million for the Daily Mail is a much better indicator of the UK's political bias >:-) ......... You need to wake up BG the UK is moving to the Right side of the political spectrum B-) ...... The loony lefties Rag is being left behind along with Labour and the BBC dinosaurs (lol) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-08 12:06 PM You need to wake up BG the UK is moving to the Right side of the political spectrum B-) ...... The loony lefties Rag is being left behind along with Labour and the BBC dinosaurs (lol) ........ Right wing is supposed to favor the free market. Whats right wing about restricting the housing supply with the world's most onerous planning restrictions, whilst throwing taxpayer's borrowed money at the demand with so called 'Help to Buy - forcing up prices' *-) Currently in Folkestone where Sir Roger DeHaan (inherited SAGA from his dad and sold it for £1.35 billion) bought Folkestone Harbour for £11m and is being showered with Grants to develop it. Looks more like Left Wing Socialism for the rich. http://www.folkestoneseafront.com/category/news/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-08 12:06 PM The fact that only 150k people are prepared to "pay" to read it, compared to 1.5 million for the Daily Mail is a much better indicator of the UK's political bias >:-) ......... Public executions, floggings, bear baiting, prisoners thrown to the lions etc used to draw massive crowds. Just because lots of people watch it doesn't mean its good. :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-08 1:40 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-08 12:06 PM You need to wake up BG the UK is moving to the Right side of the political spectrum B-) ...... The loony lefties Rag is being left behind along with Labour and the BBC dinosaurs (lol) ........ Right wing is supposed to favor the free market. / It does ;-) ........It's the EU that operates as a protectionist zone for Germany *-) ....... http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/17/germans-march-against-trade-deals-with-us-and-canada-stop-ceta-ttip.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-08 2:02 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-08 12:06 PM The fact that only 150k people are prepared to "pay" to read it, compared to 1.5 million for the Daily Mail is a much better indicator of the UK's political bias >:-) ......... Public executions, floggings, bear baiting, prisoners thrown to the lions etc used to draw massive crowds. Just because lots of people watch it doesn't mean its good. :-( There you go again *-) ......Comparing today's Joe public with those of 100's of years ago, you need to move with the times John, sometimes I get the feeling you're some 18th century boho living in a garret in Soho :-| ...... Fortunately I have far more confidence in the collective common sense of the British public, than those intellectual snobs that buy the Guardian >:-) .......... They voted for BREXIT didn't they?(lol) B-) ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-08 12:06 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 8:38 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 7:12 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 6:31 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 5:43 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... What "begging bowl"? :-S It's not gone subscription but don't be so naive to think your Beano rag will enjoy eternal exemption. It's circulation is only 7000 more than The Guardian so it's future is far from secure as more people turn to online news media. Only 7000 more? 8-) ........What's 1,511,357 minus 156,756 ?......1,354,601 (lol) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation The only thing that surprises me is that there are 156,756 loony liberals prepared to buy the left wing rag >:-) .. A Wiki link.....lol......anyone can stick whatever figures they like on wiki! (lol) When i said 7000 i was being generous. It's actually 6,725. https://www.statista.com/statistics/246077/reach-of-selected-national-newspapers-in-the-uk/ Your link includes those who read it online. which includes the likes of me who like a good laugh ;-) ......... Of course it does.......also including print. It states that clearly on the site if you read it properly! *-) And that applies to all the media titles listed. The Daily Mail (including The Mail on Sunday) print title and its website dailymail.co.uk reached an average 18.4 million individuals a month through both its print and digital formats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 Bulletguy - 2017-04-08 4:10 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-08 12:06 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 8:38 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 7:12 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 6:31 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 5:43 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... What "begging bowl"? :-S It's not gone subscription but don't be so naive to think your Beano rag will enjoy eternal exemption. It's circulation is only 7000 more than The Guardian so it's future is far from secure as more people turn to online news media. Only 7000 more? 8-) ........What's 1,511,357 minus 156,756 ?......1,354,601 (lol) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation The only thing that surprises me is that there are 156,756 loony liberals prepared to buy the left wing rag >:-) .. A Wiki link.....lol......anyone can stick whatever figures they like on wiki! (lol) When i said 7000 i was being generous. It's actually 6,725. https://www.statista.com/statistics/246077/reach-of-selected-national-newspapers-in-the-uk/ Your link includes those who read it online. which includes the likes of me who like a good laugh ;-) ......... Of course it does.......also including print. It states that clearly on the site if you read it properly! *-) And that applies to all the media titles listed. The Daily Mail (including The Mail on Sunday) print title and its website dailymail.co.uk reached an average 18.4 million individuals a month through both its print and digital formats. Which why I highlighted the number of folk who are actually prepared to buy a paper ;-) .......... As a example of how many people are prepared to put their money where their mouthpiece is...... In the case of the Guardian it's a paltry 150 thousand compared to the Daily Mails 1.5 million >:-) ....... Which kinda suggests you loony lefties are either tight or are on the verge of becoming extinct :D ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-08 5:09 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-08 4:10 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-08 12:06 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 8:38 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 7:12 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 6:31 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-07 5:43 PM Bulletguy - 2017-04-07 5:33 PM John52 - 2017-04-07 2:14 PM So much for the Daily Mail version *-) The reality is all newspapers are struggling as more people read free online, and advertising revenues are reduced due to competition from the likes of Google. Guardian still has a big readership. But it has been hit harder than most because its readers tend to have more sense than money, so are less attractive to advertisers. Exactly that (bib). Many online papers including the Torygraph have also gone subscription. Apart from it's usual daft drivel i've no idea why The Wail consider this "newsworthy" at all as they shipped their printing out of London four years ago! The Guardian has always been a Manchester newspaper and originally called The Manchester Guardian though it's HQ remains in London. Just another non-story. *-) Why the begging bowel with every article then?.........If it had such a faithful readership surely they would be as wealthy as the DM ;-) ........ Unless the truth is they're just like Labour.....Up a loony lefty creek without a paddle >:-) ....... What "begging bowl"? :-S It's not gone subscription but don't be so naive to think your Beano rag will enjoy eternal exemption. It's circulation is only 7000 more than The Guardian so it's future is far from secure as more people turn to online news media. Only 7000 more? 8-) ........What's 1,511,357 minus 156,756 ?......1,354,601 (lol) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom_by_circulation The only thing that surprises me is that there are 156,756 loony liberals prepared to buy the left wing rag >:-) .. A Wiki link.....lol......anyone can stick whatever figures they like on wiki! (lol) When i said 7000 i was being generous. It's actually 6,725. https://www.statista.com/statistics/246077/reach-of-selected-national-newspapers-in-the-uk/ Your link includes those who read it online. which includes the likes of me who like a good laugh ;-) ......... Of course it does.......also including print. It states that clearly on the site if you read it properly! *-) And that applies to all the media titles listed. The Daily Mail (including The Mail on Sunday) print title and its website dailymail.co.uk reached an average 18.4 million individuals a month through both its print and digital formats. Which why I highlighted the number of folk who are actually prepared to buy a paper ;-) .......... As a example of how many people are prepared to put their money where their mouthpiece is...... In the case of the Guardian it's a paltry 150 thousand compared to the Daily Mails 1.5 million >:-) ....... Which kinda suggests you loony lefties are either tight or are on the verge of becoming extinct :D ..... Judging by the crowds they used to attract I guess more people would pay to see a public execution than by a serious newspaper? I guess less money is spent on serious newspapers than is thrown away on these seaside slot machines, and similarly rigged games on the pier. Lots of money wasted on junk :-S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 10, 2017 Share Posted April 10, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-10 6:45 AM Judging by the crowds they used to attract I guess more people would pay to see a public execution than by a serious newspaper? I guess less money is spent on serious newspapers than is thrown away on these seaside slot machines, and similarly rigged games on the pier. Lots of money wasted on junk :-S No need to waste money on such things John ;-) ....... Besides things have moved on from public executions......we now have Remoaner baiting which is a "free" non contact blood sport :D ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 12, 2017 Share Posted April 12, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-10 8:38 AM John52 - 2017-04-10 6:45 AM Judging by the crowds they used to attract I guess more people would pay to see a public execution than by a serious newspaper? I guess less money is spent on serious newspapers than is thrown away on these seaside slot machines, and similarly rigged games on the pier. Lots of money wasted on junk :-S No need to waste money on such things John ;-) ....... So you waste it on paying for the Daily Mails made up stories instead :-S http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39575680 Melinda Trump can afford to sue the Daily Mail - but what about their victims who can't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 12, 2017 Share Posted April 12, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-12 1:28 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-10 8:38 AM John52 - 2017-04-10 6:45 AM Judging by the crowds they used to attract I guess more people would pay to see a public execution than by a serious newspaper? I guess less money is spent on serious newspapers than is thrown away on these seaside slot machines, and similarly rigged games on the pier. Lots of money wasted on junk :-S No need to waste money on such things John ;-) ....... So you waste it on paying for the Daily Mails made up stories instead :-S http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39575680 Melinda Trump can afford to sue the Daily Mail - but what about their victims who can't? Nothing stopping other folk from suing ;-) ........Besides I'm told we have the finest legal system in the world........So surely that will guarantee justice is done? (lol) (lol) (lol) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 12, 2017 Share Posted April 12, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-12 2:27 PM we have the finest legal system in the world.... For those who can afford to use it maybe *-) But the point I am trying to make is the Daily Mail's salacious made up stories might get them more readers than a paper that prints the truth. That doesn't make the Mail a better paper though does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 13, 2017 Share Posted April 13, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-12 10:13 PM pelmetman - 2017-04-12 2:27 PM we have the finest legal system in the world.... For those who can afford to use it maybe *-) But the point I am trying to make is the Daily Mail's salacious made up stories might get them more readers than a paper that prints the truth. That doesn't make the Mail a better paper though does it? Made up stories?.......The Guardian hasn't even bothered to mention the fact that nearly 30 Asian perverts have appeared in court in Huddersfield *-) ........ They'd much rather report stuff like this :-| ....... https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/05/victims-should-marry-their-rapists-malaysian-mp-tells-parliament I know which paper is likely to tell it how it is, and its not the Guardian (lol) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 13, 2017 Share Posted April 13, 2017 pelmetman - 2017-04-13 7:43 AM ....The Guardian hasn't even bothered to mention the fact that nearly 30 Asian perverts have appeared in court in Huddersfield *-) ........ Obsession with sex perverts is very popular in prisons I understand because such people like to pretend there are others worse than them. I haven't seen anything about the Huddersfield case but then I haven't gone looking for it. When the Guardian does report on such things it tends to be factual like your Malaysian link,. But, unlike the Daily Mail, the Guardian is not afraid to question the lynch mob like this: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2002/may/28/childprotection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted April 13, 2017 Share Posted April 13, 2017 Whats happening in Huddersfield doesn't concern me because its already being dealt with. .Just seen the Guardian report on Malaysia. I suppose such people are several centuries behind Britain - as I recall a past King of England married a 12 year old girl (and we are forced to accept his descendants as our Heads of State) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 13, 2017 Share Posted April 13, 2017 John52 - 2017-04-13 12:40 PM Whats happening in Huddersfield doesn't concern me because its already being dealt with. .Just seen the Guardian report on Malaysia. I suppose such people are several centuries behind Britain - as I recall a past King of England married a 12 year old girl (and we are forced to accept his descendants as our Heads of State) Well that's 6 years older than a certain prophet ;-) .........and look at the grief he's causing 8-) ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.