Bulletguy Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-03-22 3:41 AM Seems OK for Obama to do something similar in 2012 though https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election You need concentrate your ire on the present White House incumbent....not one whose gone. The same as May who is either ignorant of fact, plain stupid, or being economical with the truth over Tory party links to Cambridge Analytica and SCL. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/21/tory-donors-among-investors-in-cambridge-analytica-parent-firm-scl-group http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43486054 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 3:16 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 3:41 AM Seems OK for Obama to do something similar in 2012 though https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election You need concentrate your ire on the present White House incumbent....not one whose gone. The same as May who is either ignorant of fact, plain stupid, or being economical with the truth over Tory party links to Cambridge Analytica and SCL. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/21/tory-donors-among-investors-in-cambridge-analytica-parent-firm-scl-group http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43486054 Just as I thought ... Good for one and not the other ... Didn't failed Muslim Mayor Sadick Khan use that very same company recently ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-03-22 5:49 PM Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 3:16 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 3:41 AM Seems OK for Obama to do something similar in 2012 though https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election You need concentrate your ire on the present White House incumbent....not one whose gone. The same as May who is either ignorant of fact, plain stupid, or being economical with the truth over Tory party links to Cambridge Analytica and SCL. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/21/tory-donors-among-investors-in-cambridge-analytica-parent-firm-scl-group http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43486054 Just as I thought ... Good for one and not the other ... No not at all......it's just rather silly quoting an ex-President in an attempt to deflect away from those in current political office. I know it must be upsetting for you to see Cambridge Analytica 'engineered' the Trump campaign by meddling in democracy. An important fact for you to bear in mind is CA may well have committed very serious offences under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. CA operates it's hq in the UK, but is registered as a company in the US. Didn't failed Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan use that very same company recently ??? Is this just wild conjecture or do you have any factual linked reports? If not then we can all safely assume you've just made it up as you usually do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 7:02 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 5:49 PM Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 3:16 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 3:41 AM Seems OK for Obama to do something similar in 2012 though https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election You need concentrate your ire on the present White House incumbent....not one whose gone. The same as May who is either ignorant of fact, plain stupid, or being economical with the truth over Tory party links to Cambridge Analytica and SCL. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/21/tory-donors-among-investors-in-cambridge-analytica-parent-firm-scl-group http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43486054 Just as I thought ... Good for one and not the other ... No not at all......it's just rather silly quoting an ex-President in an attempt to deflect away from those in current political office. I know it must be upsetting for you to see Cambridge Analytica 'engineered' the Trump campaign by meddling in democracy. An important fact for you to bear in mind is CA may well have committed very serious offences under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. CA operates it's hq in the UK, but is registered as a company in the US. Didn't failed Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan use that very same company recently ??? Is this just wild conjecture or do you have any factual linked reports? If not then we can all safely assume you've just made it up as you usually do. Not silly at all ... Surely whats good for one has to be good for the other does it not and do remember in 2012 Obama was doing it as President not as someone like POTUS Trump who hoped to be elected President ... As for Sadick , look it up doesn't normally stop ya ... I'll give ya a clue it has a Brexit twist to it ... Happy hunting and I don't mean for my address cos you've already searched that out aint ya xxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-03-22 7:09 PM Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 7:02 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 5:49 PM Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 3:16 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 3:41 AM Seems OK for Obama to do something similar in 2012 though https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election You need concentrate your ire on the present White House incumbent....not one whose gone. The same as May who is either ignorant of fact, plain stupid, or being economical with the truth over Tory party links to Cambridge Analytica and SCL. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/21/tory-donors-among-investors-in-cambridge-analytica-parent-firm-scl-group http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43486054 Just as I thought ... Good for one and not the other ... No not at all......it's just rather silly quoting an ex-President in an attempt to deflect away from those in current political office. I know it must be upsetting for you to see Cambridge Analytica 'engineered' the Trump campaign by meddling in democracy. An important fact for you to bear in mind is CA may well have committed very serious offences under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. CA operates it's hq in the UK, but is registered as a company in the US. Didn't failed Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan use that very same company recently ??? Is this just wild conjecture or do you have any factual linked reports? If not then we can all safely assume you've just made it up as you usually do. Not silly at all ... Surely whats good for one has to be good for the other does it not and do remember in 2012 Obama was doing it as President not as someone like POTUS Trump who hoped to be elected President You haven't been keeping up very well have you? *-) This is just for starters; "When you think about the fact that Donald Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million votes, but won the Electoral College, that's down to the data and the research," Alex Tayler, Cambridge's chief data officer, said in undercover footage by Channel 4 News aired in the UK this week. "That's how he won the election." https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/21/politics/trump-campaign-cambridge-analytica/index.html Trump and his allies are well-practiced in the art of distancing themselves from their own campaign officials and activities once they run into controversy. The swiftly intensifying scandal involving Cambridge Analytica is no different. With the data analytics firm battling headlines over a breach of Facebook users’ private data as part of their work to elect Trump and over its now-suspended CEO’s secret pitch of honey traps to influence elections around the world, the Trump team is once again deploying a hardly-knew-‘em defense. The Trump campaign was not always so eager to distance itself from Cambridge Analytica, especially in the wake of the surprise 2016 win. “We found that Facebook and digital targeting were the most effective ways to reach the audiences,” Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and a top campaign aide, told Forbes after the election during an interview in which he boasted about the campaign’s digital strategy. “After the primary, we started ramping up because we knew that doing a national campaign is different than doing a primary campaign. That was when we formalized the system because we had to ramp up for digital fundraising. We brought in Cambridge Analytica.” https://www.politico.eu/article/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign-tries-to-distance-itself-from-scandal-ridden/ https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-latest-cambridge-analytica-expose-raises-more-questions-about-firms-role-in-the-trump-campaign Special counsel Robert Mueller is scrutinizing the connections between President Donald Trump's campaign and the data mining firm Cambridge Analytica, which has come under fierce criticism over reports that it swiped the data of more than 50 million Facebook users to sway elections. Mueller's investigators have asked former campaign officials about the Trump campaign's data operations, particularly about how it collected and utilized voter data in battleground states, according to a person with direct knowledge of the line of inquiry but not authorized to discuss it publicly. https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/mueller-examining-cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign-ties-53935995 As for Sadiq , look it up doesn't normally stop ya ... I'll give ya a clue it has a Brexit twist to it Why not post links.....just as i've done above in relation to Trumps campaign? :-S I suspect you've confused Cambridge Analytica with Cambridge Econometrics.....which has no relevance at all, but it would be a lot more helpful if you posted links instead of playing at Cluedo. Regarding Brexit and Cambridge Analytica On his blog, Dominic Cummings (Leave Campaign director) has written thousands of words about the referendum campaign. What is missing is any details about his data scientists. He “hired physicists” is all he’ll say. In the books on Brexit, other members of the team talk about “Dom’s astrophysicists”, who he kept “a tightly guarded secret”. [bThey built models, using data “scraped” off Facebook.[/b] Finally, after weeks of messages, he sent me an email. We were agreed on one thing, it turned out. He wrote: “The law/regulatory agencies are such a joke the reality is that anybody who wanted to cheat the law could do it easily without people realising.” But, he says, “by encouraging people to focus on non-stories like Mercer’s nonexistent role in the referendum you are obscuring these important issues”. And to finally answer the question about how Vote Leave found this obscure Canadian company on the other side of the planet, he wrote: “Someone found AIQ [AggregateIQ] on the internet and interviewed them on the phone then told me – let’s go with these guys. They were clearly more competent than any others we’d spoken to in London.” The most unfortunate aspect of this – for Dominic Cummings – is that this isn’t credible. It’s the work of moments to put a date filter on Google search and discover that in late 2015 or early 2016, there are no Google hits for “Aggregate IQ”. There is no press coverage. No random mentions. It doesn’t even throw up its website. I have caught Dominic Cummings in what appears to be an alternative fact. But what is an actual fact is that Gettleson and Borwick, both previously consultants for SCL and Cambridge Analytica, were both core members of the Vote Leave team. They’re both in the official Vote Leave documents lodged with the Electoral Commission, though they coyly describe their previous work for SCL/Cambridge Analytica as “micro-targeting in Antigua and Trinidad” and “direct communications for several PACs, Senate and Governor campaigns”. And Borwick wasn’t just any member of the team. He was Vote Leave’s chief technology officer. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted March 22, 2018 Share Posted March 22, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 8:47 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 7:09 PM Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 7:02 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 5:49 PM Bulletguy - 2018-03-22 3:16 PM antony1969 - 2018-03-22 3:41 AM Seems OK for Obama to do something similar in 2012 though https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/17/obama-digital-data-machine-facebook-election You need concentrate your ire on the present White House incumbent....not one whose gone. The same as May who is either ignorant of fact, plain stupid, or being economical with the truth over Tory party links to Cambridge Analytica and SCL. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/21/tory-donors-among-investors-in-cambridge-analytica-parent-firm-scl-group http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-43486054 Just as I thought ... Good for one and not the other ... No not at all......it's just rather silly quoting an ex-President in an attempt to deflect away from those in current political office. I know it must be upsetting for you to see Cambridge Analytica 'engineered' the Trump campaign by meddling in democracy. An important fact for you to bear in mind is CA may well have committed very serious offences under the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. CA operates it's hq in the UK, but is registered as a company in the US. Didn't failed Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan use that very same company recently ??? Is this just wild conjecture or do you have any factual linked reports? If not then we can all safely assume you've just made it up as you usually do. Not silly at all ... Surely whats good for one has to be good for the other does it not and do remember in 2012 Obama was doing it as President not as someone like POTUS Trump who hoped to be elected President You haven't been keeping up very well have you? *-) This is just for starters; "When you think about the fact that Donald Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million votes, but won the Electoral College, that's down to the data and the research," Alex Tayler, Cambridge's chief data officer, said in undercover footage by Channel 4 News aired in the UK this week. "That's how he won the election." https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/21/politics/trump-campaign-cambridge-analytica/index.html Trump and his allies are well-practiced in the art of distancing themselves from their own campaign officials and activities once they run into controversy. The swiftly intensifying scandal involving Cambridge Analytica is no different. With the data analytics firm battling headlines over a breach of Facebook users’ private data as part of their work to elect Trump and over its now-suspended CEO’s secret pitch of honey traps to influence elections around the world, the Trump team is once again deploying a hardly-knew-‘em defense. The Trump campaign was not always so eager to distance itself from Cambridge Analytica, especially in the wake of the surprise 2016 win. “We found that Facebook and digital targeting were the most effective ways to reach the audiences,” Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law and a top campaign aide, told Forbes after the election during an interview in which he boasted about the campaign’s digital strategy. “After the primary, we started ramping up because we knew that doing a national campaign is different than doing a primary campaign. That was when we formalized the system because we had to ramp up for digital fundraising. We brought in Cambridge Analytica.” https://www.politico.eu/article/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign-tries-to-distance-itself-from-scandal-ridden/ https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-latest-cambridge-analytica-expose-raises-more-questions-about-firms-role-in-the-trump-campaign Special counsel Robert Mueller is scrutinizing the connections between President Donald Trump's campaign and the data mining firm Cambridge Analytica, which has come under fierce criticism over reports that it swiped the data of more than 50 million Facebook users to sway elections. Mueller's investigators have asked former campaign officials about the Trump campaign's data operations, particularly about how it collected and utilized voter data in battleground states, according to a person with direct knowledge of the line of inquiry but not authorized to discuss it publicly. https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/mueller-examining-cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign-ties-53935995 As for Sadiq , look it up doesn't normally stop ya ... I'll give ya a clue it has a Brexit twist to it Why not post links.....just as i've done above in relation to Trumps campaign? :-S I suspect you've confused Cambridge Analytica with Cambridge Econometrics.....which has no relevance at all, but it would be a lot more helpful if you posted links instead of playing at Cluedo. Regarding Brexit and Cambridge Analytica On his blog, Dominic Cummings (Leave Campaign director) has written thousands of words about the referendum campaign. What is missing is any details about his data scientists. He “hired physicists” is all he’ll say. In the books on Brexit, other members of the team talk about “Dom’s astrophysicists”, who he kept “a tightly guarded secret”. [bThey built models, using data “scraped” off Facebook.[/b] Finally, after weeks of messages, he sent me an email. We were agreed on one thing, it turned out. He wrote: “The law/regulatory agencies are such a joke the reality is that anybody who wanted to cheat the law could do it easily without people realising.” But, he says, “by encouraging people to focus on non-stories like Mercer’s nonexistent role in the referendum you are obscuring these important issues”. And to finally answer the question about how Vote Leave found this obscure Canadian company on the other side of the planet, he wrote: “Someone found AIQ [AggregateIQ] on the internet and interviewed them on the phone then told me – let’s go with these guys. They were clearly more competent than any others we’d spoken to in London.” The most unfortunate aspect of this – for Dominic Cummings – is that this isn’t credible. It’s the work of moments to put a date filter on Google search and discover that in late 2015 or early 2016, there are no Google hits for “Aggregate IQ”. There is no press coverage. No random mentions. It doesn’t even throw up its website. I have caught Dominic Cummings in what appears to be an alternative fact. But what is an actual fact is that Gettleson and Borwick, both previously consultants for SCL and Cambridge Analytica, were both core members of the Vote Leave team. They’re both in the official Vote Leave documents lodged with the Electoral Commission, though they coyly describe their previous work for SCL/Cambridge Analytica as “micro-targeting in Antigua and Trinidad” and “direct communications for several PACs, Senate and Governor campaigns”. And Borwick wasn’t just any member of the team. He was Vote Leave’s chief technology officer. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/07/the-great-british-brexit-robbery-hijacked-democracy Can you break that long post up with some pictures or sumat ... Way too long to keep my attention ... Sorry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted March 22, 2018 Author Share Posted March 22, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-03-22 8:50 PM Can you break that long post up with some pictures or sumat ... Way too long to keep my attention ... No........it will do you good to try some real reading for a change instead of feeding off Twitter and Daily Heil cartoon headlines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted March 27, 2018 Author Share Posted March 27, 2018 Chris Wylie appeared before the Select Committee to give evidence earlier today in a marathon four hour session. He came over as extremely articulate, confident and obviously well informed about the practices of Cambridge Analytica and its associated companies. After all, he was CA's Research Director so he should be, though they are now frantically downplaying his role in an attempt at their own damage limitation. Too late...... Wylie told the select committee that the pro-Brexit campaign had a “common plan” to use the network of companies to get around election spending laws and said he thought there “could have been a different outcome had there not been, in my view, cheating”. “It makes me so angry, because a lot of people supported leave because they believe in the application of British law and British sovereignty. And to irrevocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation of the constitutional settlement of this country.” Simply staggering.......watch it and ask yourself if you still believe you live in a democracy. https://www.channel4.com/news/whistleblower-accuses-pro-leave-groups-of-cheating-in-referendum https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/facebook-data-misuse-scandal-affects-substantially-more-than-50m-claims-wylie/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-03-27 11:51 PM Chris Wylie appeared before the Select Committee to give evidence earlier today in a marathon four hour session. He came over as extremely articulate, confident and obviously well informed about the practices of Cambridge Analytica and its associated companies. After all, he was CA's Research Director so he should be, though they are now frantically downplaying his role in an attempt at their own damage limitation. Too late...... Wylie told the select committee that the pro-Brexit campaign had a “common plan” to use the network of companies to get around election spending laws and said he thought there “could have been a different outcome had there not been, in my view, cheating”. “It makes me so angry, because a lot of people supported leave because they believe in the application of British law and British sovereignty. And to irrevocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation of the constitutional settlement of this country.” Simply staggering.......watch it and ask yourself if you still believe you live in a democracy. https://www.channel4.com/news/whistleblower-accuses-pro-leave-groups-of-cheating-in-referendum https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/facebook-data-misuse-scandal-affects-substantially-more-than-50m-claims-wylie/ ......and Cameron didn't cheat by using 9 million of taxpayers money?..........Hypocrite *-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-03-28 8:14 AM Bulletguy - 2018-03-27 11:51 PM Chris Wylie appeared before the Select Committee to give evidence earlier today in a marathon four hour session. He came over as extremely articulate, confident and obviously well informed about the practices of Cambridge Analytica and its associated companies. After all, he was CA's Research Director so he should be, though they are now frantically downplaying his role in an attempt at their own damage limitation. Too late...... Wylie told the select committee that the pro-Brexit campaign had a “common plan” to use the network of companies to get around election spending laws and said he thought there “could have been a different outcome had there not been, in my view, cheating”. “It makes me so angry, because a lot of people supported leave because they believe in the application of British law and British sovereignty. And to irrevocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation of the constitutional settlement of this country.” Simply staggering.......watch it and ask yourself if you still believe you live in a democracy. https://www.channel4.com/news/whistleblower-accuses-pro-leave-groups-of-cheating-in-referendum https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/facebook-data-misuse-scandal-affects-substantially-more-than-50m-claims-wylie/ ......and Cameron didn't cheat by using 9 million of taxpayers money?..........Hypocrite *-) ........ Bullets basically saying Leave changed the course of the neverendum with a few hundred thousand quid while Cameron couldn't with nine million quid of taxpayers money ... You've just gotta laugh ... I can't remember what the weather was like on that day in 2016 ... At some point the whinge brothers on here have to use that as an excuse Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-03-28 8:42 AM pelmetman - 2018-03-28 8:14 AM Bulletguy - 2018-03-27 11:51 PM Chris Wylie appeared before the Select Committee to give evidence earlier today in a marathon four hour session. He came over as extremely articulate, confident and obviously well informed about the practices of Cambridge Analytica and its associated companies. After all, he was CA's Research Director so he should be, though they are now frantically downplaying his role in an attempt at their own damage limitation. Too late...... Wylie told the select committee that the pro-Brexit campaign had a “common plan” to use the network of companies to get around election spending laws and said he thought there “could have been a different outcome had there not been, in my view, cheating”. “It makes me so angry, because a lot of people supported leave because they believe in the application of British law and British sovereignty. And to irrevocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation of the constitutional settlement of this country.” Simply staggering.......watch it and ask yourself if you still believe you live in a democracy. https://www.channel4.com/news/whistleblower-accuses-pro-leave-groups-of-cheating-in-referendum https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/facebook-data-misuse-scandal-affects-substantially-more-than-50m-claims-wylie/ ......and Cameron didn't cheat by using 9 million of taxpayers money?..........Hypocrite *-) ........ Bullets basically saying Leave changed the course of the neverendum with a few hundred thousand quid while Cameron couldn't with nine million quid of taxpayers money ... You've just gotta laugh ... I can't remember what the weather was like on that day in 2016 ... At some point the whinge brothers on here have to use that as an excuse The weather wont have been illegal though. If a tour de France winner or an Olympic Gold medal winner was found afterwards to have taken even a small amount of drugs they would be stripped of their medals and their victory declared void would they not? YOU have cheated and broken the law!! Yes you! Lock em up!!! Lock Hinge and Bracket up!!! Go Gina!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Barryd999 - 2018-03-28 10:10 AM antony1969 - 2018-03-28 8:42 AM pelmetman - 2018-03-28 8:14 AM Bulletguy - 2018-03-27 11:51 PM Chris Wylie appeared before the Select Committee to give evidence earlier today in a marathon four hour session. He came over as extremely articulate, confident and obviously well informed about the practices of Cambridge Analytica and its associated companies. After all, he was CA's Research Director so he should be, though they are now frantically downplaying his role in an attempt at their own damage limitation. Too late...... Wylie told the select committee that the pro-Brexit campaign had a “common plan” to use the network of companies to get around election spending laws and said he thought there “could have been a different outcome had there not been, in my view, cheating”. “It makes me so angry, because a lot of people supported leave because they believe in the application of British law and British sovereignty. And to irrevocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation of the constitutional settlement of this country.” Simply staggering.......watch it and ask yourself if you still believe you live in a democracy. https://www.channel4.com/news/whistleblower-accuses-pro-leave-groups-of-cheating-in-referendum https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/facebook-data-misuse-scandal-affects-substantially-more-than-50m-claims-wylie/ ......and Cameron didn't cheat by using 9 million of taxpayers money?..........Hypocrite *-) ........ Bullets basically saying Leave changed the course of the neverendum with a few hundred thousand quid while Cameron couldn't with nine million quid of taxpayers money ... You've just gotta laugh ... I can't remember what the weather was like on that day in 2016 ... At some point the whinge brothers on here have to use that as an excuse The weather wont have been illegal though. If a tour de France winner or an Olympic Gold medal winner was found afterwards to have taken even a small amount of drugs they would be stripped of their medals and their victory declared void would they not? YOU have cheated and broken the law!! Yes you! Lock em up!!! Lock Hinge and Bracket up!!! Go Gina!!! Actually if we have broken the law to get out of the EU it would be fitting considering how corrupt the EU has been for years ... Whats good for ones gotta be good for t'other ... Im glad your not going to blame the weather though for losing that big red ruddy bus gig of yours is bad enough Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Actually the big red bus was illegal as well. It illegally used the NHS logo. No I'm not kidding! Lock em up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Barryd999 - 2018-03-28 3:00 PM Actually the big red bus was illegal as well. It illegally used the NHS logo. No I'm not kidding! Lock em up! Great ... Makes it even funnier ... Wonder how much illegal stuffs gone on under the disguise of that EU flag over the years ... This whole illegal thing is getting funnier by the hour and totally fits in with the whole EU thing ... Have you looked closely at the tyres on that bus for illegal tyre wear ... Could be another way to try and halt the will of the people ... Was it parked on a double yellow , check it Barry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted March 28, 2018 Author Share Posted March 28, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-03-28 8:14 AM Bulletguy - 2018-03-27 11:51 PM Chris Wylie appeared before the Select Committee to give evidence earlier today in a marathon four hour session. He came over as extremely articulate, confident and obviously well informed about the practices of Cambridge Analytica and its associated companies. After all, he was CA's Research Director so he should be, though they are now frantically downplaying his role in an attempt at their own damage limitation. Too late...... Wylie told the select committee that the pro-Brexit campaign had a “common plan” to use the network of companies to get around election spending laws and said he thought there “could have been a different outcome had there not been, in my view, cheating”. “It makes me so angry, because a lot of people supported leave because they believe in the application of British law and British sovereignty. And to irrevocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation of the constitutional settlement of this country.” Simply staggering.......watch it and ask yourself if you still believe you live in a democracy. https://www.channel4.com/news/whistleblower-accuses-pro-leave-groups-of-cheating-in-referendum https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/facebook-data-misuse-scandal-affects-substantially-more-than-50m-claims-wylie/ ......and Cameron didn't cheat by using 9 million of taxpayers money?..........Hypocrite *-) ........ You're like a stuck record. *-) I've told you before you've failed to understand anything about this matter because you flatly refuse to listen to what Chris Wylie said on the initial reports, and yesterday before the Select Committee.....neither have you read about it so you have absolutely zero comprehension of what you're talking about. Until you do....there's little point in posting because you are just posting utter nonsense. Why are you so afraid? JUST LISTEN and READ......do yourself a favour. antony1969 - 2018-03-28 8:42 AM Bullets basically saying Leave changed the course of the neverendum with a few hundred thousand quid while Cameron couldn't with nine million quid of taxpayers money ... The figure amount isn't the issue......it's how it was channelled. The reason you pair haven't yet grasped this is because you won't listen to what Chris Wylie has clearly explained and is now widely reported. Ignore any juicy headers which you both seem to relish.......read and listen to the detail. That's where you will learn the seriousness of this matter. antony1969 - 2018-03-28 11:24 AM Actually if we have broken the law to get out of the EU it would be fitting considering how corrupt the EU has been for years ... On what evidence are you concluding that?!! I hope you have better than the Daily Heil or Twitter to back up such wild speculation?!! Your flippant dismissiveness of law comes as no surprise though. :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-03-28 3:43 PM Barryd999 - 2018-03-28 3:00 PM Actually the big red bus was illegal as well. It illegally used the NHS logo. No I'm not kidding! Lock em up! Great ... Makes it even funnier ... Wonder how much illegal stuffs gone on under the disguise of that EU flag over the years ... This whole illegal thing is getting funnier by the hour and totally fits in with the whole EU thing ... Have you looked closely at the tyres on that bus for illegal tyre wear ... Could be another way to try and halt the will of the people ... Was it parked on a double yellow , check it Barry I wonder what illegal stuff has gone on as well but I Cant think of anything so perhaps you can. Please dont roll out the old accounts have never been approved by the auditors because they have, year on year. Come on then lets have it! I think Boris should be on trial as well for illegal use of a Pasty. He claimed that it was the Pasty of independence or some such nonsense but it is the EU That has protected that Pasty, not Boris. Once we leave every fecker will be making them and claiming they are "Cornish Pasties". Trump will no doubt be shipping them in at 99p a go but they will be full of Dogs eggs instead of meat. :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 28, 2018 Share Posted March 28, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-03-28 4:13 PM pelmetman - 2018-03-28 8:14 AM Bulletguy - 2018-03-27 11:51 PM Chris Wylie appeared before the Select Committee to give evidence earlier today in a marathon four hour session. He came over as extremely articulate, confident and obviously well informed about the practices of Cambridge Analytica and its associated companies. After all, he was CA's Research Director so he should be, though they are now frantically downplaying his role in an attempt at their own damage limitation. Too late...... Wylie told the select committee that the pro-Brexit campaign had a “common plan” to use the network of companies to get around election spending laws and said he thought there “could have been a different outcome had there not been, in my view, cheating”. “It makes me so angry, because a lot of people supported leave because they believe in the application of British law and British sovereignty. And to irrevocably alter the constitutional settlement of this country on fraud is a mutilation of the constitutional settlement of this country.” Simply staggering.......watch it and ask yourself if you still believe you live in a democracy. https://www.channel4.com/news/whistleblower-accuses-pro-leave-groups-of-cheating-in-referendum https://techcrunch.com/2018/03/27/facebook-data-misuse-scandal-affects-substantially-more-than-50m-claims-wylie/ ......and Cameron didn't cheat by using 9 million of taxpayers money?..........Hypocrite *-) ........ You're like a stuck record. *-) And you're like a Dick without a home *-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted March 29, 2018 Author Share Posted March 29, 2018 Since learning of Cambridge Analyticas illegal interference in various countries democracy, Colombia and Mexico has blocked access to users of a social media app ahead of Presidential elections after learning it had been connected with CA. The app cut ties with Cambridge Analytica in Mexico after the data scandal broke, saying it had shared results of two election polls of Mexican users with the consultancy and other partners. UK and US just sat back and fiddled instead. *-) https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-03-22/cambridge-analytica-associate-severs-mexico-ties-after-scandal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 So £625k can swing an referendum where 9 million can not? *-) ........... Seems to me we need to get Cambridge Analytica to run the country >:-) ............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archiesgrandad Posted March 30, 2018 Share Posted March 30, 2018 Thank you all for helping me understand what this is all about. I was beginning to think that this was all about a little chap who had a big friend but when the big friend gave him the elbow, the little chap started to be spiteful and started saying things about the big friend. AGD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted April 3, 2018 Author Share Posted April 3, 2018 A short clip explaining how the intricate web of deceit was woven........to corrupt democracy for personal gain. and just one hour of Chris Wylie testifying to the Select Committee...MP's actually quizzed him for a staggering four hours.....and his revelations are mind blowing over how this country's constitution has been altered by fraudulent means. Brexiters take note of what he's saying because this applies directly to you. https://www.channel4.com/news/factcheck/cambridge-analytica-the-allegations-so-far Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-04-03 11:47 PM Brexiters take note of what he's saying because this applies directly to you. Hogwash *-) ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Confirms what many have thought about Facebook and other social media sites that they are mostly favourable to left leaning groups ... Zuckerberg confirmed it at his grilling ... Twitter does much the same ... Seems its not just tax payer funded corporations like the Beeb that are biased ... ... Funny that with all that unfair , biased left leaning liberal rubbish spewed by the Beeb and Facebook the right are still marching on and winning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-04-11 6:40 AM Confirms what many have thought about Facebook and other social media sites that they are mostly favourable to left leaning groups ... Zuckerberg confirmed it at his grilling ... Twitter does much the same ... Seems its not just tax payer funded corporations like the Beeb that are biased ... ... Funny that with all that unfair , biased left leaning liberal rubbish spewed by the Beeb and Facebook the right are still marching on and winning Facebook, Twitter and other social media like this forum are just platforms though so should not really be biased. It's down to who uses them if they are weighted one way or another isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Barryd999 - 2018-04-11 1:47 PM antony1969 - 2018-04-11 6:40 AM Confirms what many have thought about Facebook and other social media sites that they are mostly favourable to left leaning groups ... Zuckerberg confirmed it at his grilling ... Twitter does much the same ... Seems its not just tax payer funded corporations like the Beeb that are biased ... ... Funny that with all that unfair , biased left leaning liberal rubbish spewed by the Beeb and Facebook the right are still marching on and winning Facebook, Twitter and other social media like this forum are just platforms though so should not really be biased. It's down to who uses them if they are weighted one way or another isn't it? Nope ... Zuckerberg admits Silicon Valley is very left wing so many more Conservative right wing accounts are shut down than those of soppy wet left liberals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.