Fast Pat Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-15 8:25 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-14 2:24 PM All in this together https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/11/jacob-rees-mogg-earned-7000000-investments-since-brexit-8884678/ 7 million is that all???.........How much did your Remoaner hero Soros earn off the UK taxpayer? *-) ...... A BILLION 8-) .......... When did Soros sit in parliament and direct policy to give him financial gain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 9:03 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 8:25 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-14 2:24 PM All in this together https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/11/jacob-rees-mogg-earned-7000000-investments-since-brexit-8884678/ 7 million is that all???.........How much did your Remoaner hero Soros earn off the UK taxpayer? *-) ...... A BILLION 8-) .......... When did Soros sit in parliament and direct policy to give him financial gain? When has Rees Mogg directed parliament? ;-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
747 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 9:03 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 8:25 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-14 2:24 PM All in this together https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/11/jacob-rees-mogg-earned-7000000-investments-since-brexit-8884678/ 7 million is that all???.........How much did your Remoaner hero Soros earn off the UK taxpayer? *-) ...... A BILLION 8-) .......... When did Soros sit in parliament and direct policy to give him financial gain? When you are in the big league, you direct things from a distance. Are you simple enough to not be aware of how these things work. Rupert Murdoch is another manipulator who buys Politicians and CEOs' with pocket change (to him). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starvin marvin Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 antony1969 - 2019-03-13 6:30 AM As always ... ... Out a touch they are He’s always been right.... far right. Rabid right, if you prefer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Kirby Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Kirby Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ No? What change of circumstance requires that the border be enforced? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
747 Posted March 15, 2019 Share Posted March 15, 2019 Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. Oh, the sweet irony of that. :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... What do WTO rules say? If we want to trade under them then to comply the UK will have to have an external border control. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47559880 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-no-deal-tariff-wto-trade-eu-theresa-may-northern-ireland-a8825076.htmlu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted March 16, 2019 Author Share Posted March 16, 2019 starvin marvin - 2019-03-15 10:45 AM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 6:30 AM As always ... ... Out a touch they are He’s always been right.... far right. Rabid right, if you prefer. Thought you'd put "rabbi right" then for a momentum .... Given who you support n'all that thought it was another failed attempt at humour by ya ... Still is a failure though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:03 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... What do WTO rules say? If we want to trade under them then to comply the UK will have to have an external border control. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47559880 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-no-deal-tariff-wto-trade-eu-theresa-may-northern-ireland-a8825076.htmlu .......and we'll have one......courtesy of the ROI and the EU :D ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-16 8:15 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:03 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... What do WTO rules say? If we want to trade under them then to comply the UK will have to have an external border control. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47559880 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-no-deal-tariff-wto-trade-eu-theresa-may-northern-ireland-a8825076.htmlu .......and we'll have one......courtesy of the ROI and the EU :D ......... Nope, it us trading on WTO terms that's why the onus falls on us and Mays attempt to fudge the issue with a "temporary" border in the Irish sea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:28 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 8:15 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:03 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... What do WTO rules say? If we want to trade under them then to comply the UK will have to have an external border control. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47559880 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-no-deal-tariff-wto-trade-eu-theresa-may-northern-ireland-a8825076.htmlu .......and we'll have one......courtesy of the ROI and the EU :D ......... Nope, it us trading on WTO terms that's why the onus falls on us and Mays attempt to fudge the issue with a "temporary" border in the Irish sea. I guess we'll have to wait and see wont we......seeing as its third time lucky for Mrs May.......along with another bumper payday for the DUP :D ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:28 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 8:15 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:03 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... What do WTO rules say? If we want to trade under them then to comply the UK will have to have an external border control. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47559880 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-no-deal-tariff-wto-trade-eu-theresa-may-northern-ireland-a8825076.htmlu .......and we'll have one......courtesy of the ROI and the EU :D ......... Nope, it us trading on WTO terms that's why the onus falls on us and Mays attempt to fudge the issue with a "temporary" border in the Irish sea. I guess we'll have to wait and see wont we......seeing as its third time lucky for Mrs May.......along with another bumper payday for the DUP :D ........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-16 8:31 AM I guess we'll have to wait and see wont we......seeing as its third time lucky for Mrs May.......along with another bumper payday for the DUP :D ........... You've been doing quite a bit of that wait and see, as you watch Project Fear become reality. Still blue passports............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
747 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:03 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... What do WTO rules say? If we want to trade under them then to comply the UK will have to have an external border control. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47559880 https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-no-deal-tariff-wto-trade-eu-theresa-may-northern-ireland-a8825076.htmlu Easily sorted. One Border official and a hut. He can just wave traffic through. It has been done before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:44 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 8:31 AM I guess we'll have to wait and see wont we......seeing as its third time lucky for Mrs May.......along with another bumper payday for the DUP :D ........... You've been doing quite a bit of that wait and see, as you watch Project Fear become reality. Still blue passports............... You mean that reality where none of your "EXPERTS" predictions came true? (lol) (lol) (lol) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fast Pat Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-16 11:13 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:44 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 8:31 AM I guess we'll have to wait and see wont we......seeing as its third time lucky for Mrs May.......along with another bumper payday for the DUP :D ........... You've been doing quite a bit of that wait and see, as you watch Project Fear become reality. Still blue passports............... You mean that reality where none of your "EXPERTS" predictions came true? (lol) (lol) (lol) ........ Its official, you're in denial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 11:16 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 11:13 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-16 8:44 AM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 8:31 AM I guess we'll have to wait and see wont we......seeing as its third time lucky for Mrs May.......along with another bumper payday for the DUP :D ........... You've been doing quite a bit of that wait and see, as you watch Project Fear become reality. Still blue passports............... You mean that reality where none of your "EXPERTS" predictions came true? (lol) (lol) (lol) ........ Its official, you're in denial. Why would I want to deny the best employment figures since the 70's.....the best wage growth in 10 years......a economy that is out performing Germany? >:-) ......... I've never had it so good B-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Kirby Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... Totally delusional. Do you really suppose that those who have erected posters saying "We're back" will fail to notice why those borders have been hardened? I'm sorry Dave, but your capacity for self-deception is exceeded only by your failure to think through the consequences of what you advocate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Kirby Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 747 - 2019-03-16 10:43 AM...………………….Easily sorted. One Border official and a hut. He can just wave traffic through. It has been done before. Has it? When? You also need to account for the number of crossing points. That means about 270 border officials, and 270 huts - and that assumes each border crossing is open only 8 hours per day, and they are all self-managing and self-sufficient in their (presumably bullet-proof) huts. Hmmmm! Still, off you go. :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Brian Kirby - 2019-03-16 1:13 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-16 7:44 AM Fast Pat - 2019-03-15 4:03 PM pelmetman - 2019-03-15 3:16 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-15 1:31 PM teflon2 - 2019-03-14 6:44 PM Brian Kirby - 2019-03-13 12:23 PM antony1969 - 2019-03-13 10:45 AM...………………..Parliament voted massively in favour of triggering Article 50 ... They knew what it meant to trigger it then , what didn't they know 2 years ago about leaving without a deal that they know now ??? Gosh, that's really hard Antony. Let me see. Er how long have you got? This is going to go on for pages and pages. Do you really want to know? OK, let's start with the Irish border. If they had known that that complying with EU "law" for an external border after we had left, would necessitate tearing up the Belfast Agreement and rescinding the Common Travel Area, the only basis on which they could have voted for the Article 50 notification would be if they wished deliberately to mislead the public, or were suffering temporary mass delusion. 'Nuff said? ;-) Not so Brian the only EU countries legally required to maintain an external border are signatories to Shengan, neither the ROI or the UK are signatories so neither country ha to have a tin fence also we will not be members of the EU so will not be bound by EU law. (!) . Unless of course our parliament sells us down the river. But Ireland will remain a member of the EU, and appears to have entered into arrangements that mirror those of the UK regarding adoption of various parts of the Schengen agreement, which implies that border checks must take place at its border. The requirement merely shifts from UK to ROI, it does not go away. True ;-) ...........But it wont be US implementing the border :D ........ It will if you want to trade on WTO terms What did Mrs May say? ;-) ........... There will be no NI border :D .......... If the Irish/EU feel the need to install one......that's their problem >:-) ....... Totally delusional. Do you really suppose that those who have erected posters saying "We're back" will fail to notice why those borders have been hardened? I'm sorry Dave, but your capacity for self-deception is exceeded only by your failure to think through the consequences of what you advocate! The only people who are delusional are those who think NI wont vote to reunite at the first opportunity :D ......... Seems to me you Remoaners have made your last stand on quicksand >:-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
747 Posted March 16, 2019 Share Posted March 16, 2019 Brian Kirby - 2019-03-16 1:19 PM 747 - 2019-03-16 10:43 AM...………………….Easily sorted. One Border official and a hut. He can just wave traffic through. It has been done before. Has it? When? You also need to account for the number of crossing points. That means about 270 border officials, and 270 huts - and that assumes each border crossing is open only 8 hours per day, and they are all self-managing and self-sufficient in their (presumably bullet-proof) huts. Hmmmm! Still, off you go. :-D No. Make it clear that all goods must be transported on the N1 to comply with regulations. It would be a Control in name only. What happens elsewhere would be illegal (if followed up). I seem to remember that the French did something similar years ago to protect their industry. All electronic goods from (I think Japan) the Far East were subject to strict examination. They gave the task to ONE MAN. :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.