antony1969 Posted May 9, 2018 Share Posted May 9, 2018 Lordy here they are those peace loving Iranians in the place they pass all their laws burning the US flag and screaming death to America ... ... Lovely folk ... Note all the women in positions of power too ... Vile ... Wont be long before our Labour Party are burning The Star of David in Parliament Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malc d Posted May 9, 2018 Share Posted May 9, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-05-09 5:42 PM malc d - 2018-05-09 5:32 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-09 4:59 PM It hasn't stopped their provoking Sunni and Shia bun fights in the rest of the Middle East.. Of course it didn't - that wasn't part of the deal that was signed. :-| Which kinda proves it was just a pointless exercise by the pretentious pious *-) ........ So you think that stopping the Iranians from developing nuclear weapons was pointless ? (?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malc d Posted May 9, 2018 Share Posted May 9, 2018 Violet1956 - 2018-05-09 6:25 PM . Malc, Barry, BG, John52 and others, who are appalled by Trump’s decision may be right. I respect their views as they take the trouble to make sure they are well-informed. I'm not "appalled" by Trumps action as it came as no surprise. I feel sorry for the negotiators of the six countries who have spent years getting some kind of agreement with the Iranians, however flawed , because it seemed to me that stopping their nuclear weapon programmes was a good idea. And now Trump sees himself as the worlds economic policeman who will decide which countries and companies can deal with Iran. :-| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 9, 2018 Author Share Posted May 9, 2018 malc d - 2018-05-09 8:58 PM Violet1956 - 2018-05-09 6:25 PM . Malc, Barry, BG, John52 and others, who are appalled by Trump’s decision may be right. I respect their views as they take the trouble to make sure they are well-informed. I'm not "appalled" by Trumps action as it came as no surprise. I feel sorry for the negotiators of the six countries who have spent years getting some kind of agreement with the Iranians, however flawed , because it seemed to me that stopping their nuclear weapon programmes was a good idea. And now Trump sees himself as the worlds economic policeman who will decide which countries and companies can deal with Iran. :-| Because he thinks the world is his 'playground' and he's the gobby school bully boy who can swagger around and do what the hell he likes. Big mistake. We all know what happens to bully boys......they get their deserved comeuppance. China have condemned his ridiculous actions. This is what a real politician sounds like; “China regrets the decision made by the United States ... the JCPOA is a multilateral agreement ... it should be implemented in good faith by all parties.” Mr Geng said China would maintain normal trade ties with Iran, and "uphold a responsible attitude and keep in touch with the relevant parties". https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/china-joins-world-in-condemning-trump-s-iran-decision-20180509-p4zebz.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 9, 2018 Author Share Posted May 9, 2018 Brilliant piece from The Independent. I was trying to think a few hours ago – after his shameful, outrageous, insane breaking of a solemn international treaty – just who Donald Trump reminded me of. I used to think about the boastful, gung-ho racist Theodore Roosevelt, the ‘Rough Rider’ who enjoyed war (and threats). But Theodore Roosevelt actually did win the Nobel Peace Prize. And then I realised. The political leader who most resembles Trump is the late Colonel Gaddafi of Libya. The parallels are quite creepy. Gaddafi was crackers, he was a vain, capricious peacock of a man, he was obsessed with women. Gaddafi ran his business dealings through his family – now there’s a thought – and even maintained good relations with Russia. His speeches were interminable – he liked the sound of his own voice – and although he constantly lied, his audience was forced to listen and to fear his wrath. Above all, Gaddafi was completely divorced from reality. If he lied, he believed his own lies. He believed that he kept his promises. He believed in the world he wanted to believe in, even if this was non-existent. His Great Man Made River Project was supposed to Make Libya Great Again. They really do morph into one....Trumpaffi. 8-) We all know (apart from two) Trump needs a psychiatrist but i think a geneticist should also take a look at him. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/donald-trump-iran-nuclear-deal-withdrawal-colonel-gaddafi-us-libya-a8342871.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 malc d - 2018-05-09 8:44 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-09 5:42 PM malc d - 2018-05-09 5:32 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-09 4:59 PM It hasn't stopped their provoking Sunni and Shia bun fights in the rest of the Middle East.. Of course it didn't - that wasn't part of the deal that was signed. :-| Which kinda proves it was just a pointless exercise by the pretentious pious *-) ........ So you think that stopping the Iranians from developing nuclear weapons was pointless ? (?) They didn't stop them.....they just delayed their ability to build them from a few weeks to a few months :-| ......... It didn't stop Iran from destabilising the Middle East did it? *-) ............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 10, 2018 Author Share Posted May 10, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-05-10 8:48 AM malc d - 2018-05-09 8:44 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-09 5:42 PM malc d - 2018-05-09 5:32 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-09 4:59 PM It hasn't stopped their provoking Sunni and Shia bun fights in the rest of the Middle East.. Of course it didn't - that wasn't part of the deal that was signed. :-| Which kinda proves it was just a pointless exercise by the pretentious pious *-) ........ So you think that stopping the Iranians from developing nuclear weapons was pointless ? (?) They didn't stop them.....they just delayed their ability to build them from a few weeks to a few months :-| Rubbish. You don't know what you're talking about and should check out some facts from a credible and reliable source first before making wild assumptions based on pure conjecture. Not only have Iran fully complied with all JCPOA requirements since the deal, a statement was put out by the IAEA Director only yesterday; IAEA is verifying and monitoring Iran’s implementation of its nuclear-related commitments under the JCPOA. Iran is subject to the world’s most robust nuclear verification regime under the JCPOA, which is a significant verification gain. As of today, the IAEA can confirm that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented by Iran. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/statement-by-iaea-director-general-yukiya-amano-9-may-2018 And Baroness Ashton who worked on the Iran deal for four years tells of the work put in to secure it. It didn't stop Iran from destabilising the Middle East did it? *-) ............ Saudi has been fighting a proxy war with Yemen since 2015.....funny that Trump ignores that and doesn't even have SA on his silly ban list. I wonder why that is? ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 2:12 PM Saudi has been fighting a proxy war with Yemen since 2015.....funny that Trump ignores that and doesn't even have SA on his silly ban list. I wonder why that is? ;-) It's called taking sides ;-) ........That's what happens in a war *-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 2:12 PM Rubbish. You don't know what you're talking about and should check out some facts from a credible and reliable source first before making wild assumptions based on pure conjecture. http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-long-it-would-take-iran-to-make-a-nuclear-weapon-2015-3?r=US&IR=T As I said the difference is weeks compared to months ;-) .......... So the accord is about as much use as Corbyn inviting the Ayatollah for tea (lol) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 10, 2018 Author Share Posted May 10, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-05-10 2:32 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 2:12 PM Saudi has been fighting a proxy war with Yemen since 2015.....funny that Trump ignores that and doesn't even have SA on his silly ban list. I wonder why that is? ;-) It's called taking sides ;-) ........That's what happens in a war *-) .......... War isn't a game. Countless thousands of innocent victims get killed unless they manage to escape.....and even when they do, you don't want to give safe sanctuary to any. pelmetman - 2018-05-10 2:42 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 2:12 PM Rubbish. You don't know what you're talking about and should check out some facts from a credible and reliable source first before making wild assumptions based on pure conjecture. http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-long-it-would-take-iran-to-make-a-nuclear-weapon-2015-3?r=US&IR=T As I said the difference is weeks compared to months ;-) .......... So the accord is about as much use as Corbyn inviting the Ayatollah for tea (lol) ......... Over a year at the max and some believe it could be as much as several years. Iran had been fully compliant with the nuclear deal. Trumps just blown that out the window and given them every excuse they need to begin uranium enrichment. He's a bellicose warmongering trouble maker continually goading other countries into acts of aggression. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-fast-could-iran-build-a-nuclear-bomb-1525803666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 So Trump picks a fight with Iran and violates a deal that as far as I understand it prevents Iran from having nuclear weapons which according to the whole international community is working but with absolutely no evidence whatsoever he is tearing it up and wants to start a war and we just have to take his word for it that he is right and everyone else is wrong. Take the word of the man that in the same week has denied knowing his lawyer paid off a Porn star and in the same week suggested that knives are more dangerous than guns and that London Hospitals are awash with blood because London is a war zone. I bet without looking there has been more people shot dead in America today than have been stabbed in the past year in London. Yet we are supposed to take this nutcases word on Iran. Oh deary me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 2:32 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 2:12 PM Saudi has been fighting a proxy war with Yemen since 2015.....funny that Trump ignores that and doesn't even have SA on his silly ban list. I wonder why that is? ;-) It's called taking sides ;-) ........That's what happens in a war *-) .......... War isn't a game. Countless thousands of innocent victims get killed unless they manage to escape.....and even when they do, you don't want to give safe sanctuary to any. pelmetman - 2018-05-10 2:42 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 2:12 PM Rubbish. You don't know what you're talking about and should check out some facts from a credible and reliable source first before making wild assumptions based on pure conjecture. http://uk.businessinsider.com/how-long-it-would-take-iran-to-make-a-nuclear-weapon-2015-3?r=US&IR=T As I said the difference is weeks compared to months ;-) .......... So the accord is about as much use as Corbyn inviting the Ayatollah for tea (lol) ......... Over a year at the max and some believe it could be as much as several years. Iran had been fully compliant with the nuclear deal. Trumps just blown that out the window and given them every excuse they need to begin uranium enrichment. He's a bellicose warmongering trouble maker continually goading other countries into acts of aggression. https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-fast-could-iran-build-a-nuclear-bomb-1525803666 So a whole year......Whoopydo (lol) (lol) (lol) ........I felt so much safer *-) ........ Trump is not an appeaser like you loony lefties if you hadn't noticed ;-) .........I'm of the mind that the Middle East is in such a mess that its prolly best just to nuke it >:-) ........ That was a joke :D ........maybe (lol) ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 4:42 PM War isn't a game. Countless thousands of innocent victims get killed Prolly from those bullets you made that veer off to the left 8-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 10, 2018 Author Share Posted May 10, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:49 PM So a whole year......Whoopydo pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:51 PM Prolly from those bullets you made How old are you Dave.....serious question? :-S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 5:58 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:49 PM So a whole year......Whoopydo pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:51 PM Prolly from those bullets you made How old are you Dave.....serious question? :-S I seriously think the question is relevant :-| ........ Given the moral high ground you're attempting reach ;-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 10, 2018 Author Share Posted May 10, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-05-10 6:03 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 5:58 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:49 PM So a whole year......Whoopydo pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:51 PM Prolly from those bullets you made How old are you Dave.....serious question? :-S I seriously think the question is relevant :-| ........ So do i.....hence why i asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 They said you couldn't do it but heyho ... https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/994587349718847489 ... Thankyou for your part in the release of 3 Americans held in North Korea ... No ransoms paid ... No giving in ... No nothing ... The wets would still be organising the health and safety issues ... Wet wipes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted May 10, 2018 Share Posted May 10, 2018 3am and our Presidents still at work ... ... Welcoming back our fellow citizens that he's secured the release of ... Surely even the wets can congratulate you on that Sir xxxxxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 10, 2018 Author Share Posted May 10, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-05-10 9:58 PM Well either your lying or the IAEA is ... According to them inspecting military bases ain't part of the deal regardless wether it's the UN that carries out the inspection on their behalf or not ... Your.link previously posted says so ... Now less bluff let's have the 100% nailed on proof that Iran haven't breached any of the rules ... Your looking a bit silly No Antony it's actually you whose looking very silly and increasingly so. Nuclear plants are nothing to do with military bases at all. That's where the end product, a nuclear missile would be......like the US for example who have 6,800. But first it has to be manufactured,, and that work is done at nuclear plants, they are not manufactured on military bases. So it's the source of manufacture that has to be inspected to ensure compliance....just as Iran's was and Iran has no nuclear weapons as it never developed any but since that deal has now been trashed and reneged on through an act of aggression and provocation, that may well now change and if it does, i hope you remember the person responsible. If only you put as much effort into reading through sourced information which i've already posted as you do in posting your usual silly nonsense, you'd actually learn something for a change. So i'm not posting the link to the below quote as you never bother reading anyway.....and i suspect you won't read this either because it just will not fit the narrative you've been desperately trying to push. From the IAEA - A Day in the Life of a Safeguards Inspector Walking several miles through the winding, narrow corridors of a nuclear facility in protective gear while carrying heavy equipment, often escorted by facility operator personnel: welcome to the life of an IAEA safeguards inspector. Safeguards inspectors are an essential part of the global non-proliferation regime, carrying out verification activities, so the IAEA can provide assurances to States worldwide that other countries are not diverting nuclear material from peaceful to military purposes or misusing nuclear technology. One important activity is the inspection of declared stocks of nuclear material: the IAEA is the only organization in the world with the mandate to verify the use of nuclear material and technology globally. In 2015, 709 facilities and 577 locations outside facilities in 181 States were under IAEA safeguards, making them subject to verification by IAEA inspectors. IAEA inspectors performed 2118 inspections, spending a total of 13 248 calendar days in the field. On average, safeguards inspectors are on the road around 100 days a year, but where they are going are not exactly coveted tourist locations. Power plants, uranium mines, nuclear fuel fabrication plants, enrichment facilities, research reactors and waste facilities are typically located in remote areas that are sometimes hard to access. Inspectors need to be mindful of security considerations in some locations. An inspector does about 5 kilometres of continuous walking and climbing during an inspection of the average nuclear power plant, dressed in steel-capped safety boots, safety helmets and coveralls. “It’s a very physical job,” said Abdellah Chahid, who has been an inspector for 16 years. “You really need to be fit and you need to have stamina.” To add to the physical demands of the job, there are times when the weather refuses to cooperate. Chahid recalls protecting a gamma measurement device inside his jacket during a particularly brutal winter inspection in Kazakhstan where the temperature was -30 degrees Celsius. If the device had been out in the open, the liquid crystal display would have cracked and the entire instrument would have become useless. An inspection of a nuclear power plant can last anywhere from four hours (if things go smoothly) to ten hours (if there are problems). The inspection of other types of facilities, such as those dealing with fuel fabrication, may require about a week to complete. Inside the reactor hall of a power plant, one of the key activities safeguards inspectors need to undertake is the verification of the spent fuel pond’s contents. Inspectors use improved Cerenkov viewing devices (ICVDs) to determine the presence of the spent nuclear fuel assemblies stored inside the pool and to make sure that the plant operator has as much fuel as was reported. Depending on the size and age of the reactor, the total number of spent fuel assemblies can number in the thousands. Inspectors verify these by looking for the collimated Cerenkov radiation, the telltale blue glow, which emanates from a spent fuel assembly. Most facilities provide the necessary equipment for inspectors to work in a safe environment. When this is not the case, inspectors take along and use IAEA equipment to ensure their safety. The job requires fitness, patience and adaptability. Of the around 250 applications received each year, only 15 to 25 inspectors are hired. New inspectors are trained and tested for five or six months before they are sent to facilities. Typically, their first assignments are supervised by a more experienced inspector, after which the new inspectors are finally ready to work on their own. All new inspectors also have a mentor for the first year. The IAEA employs around 385 designated inspectors from around 80 countries. Because of the specialized skills required to do the job, mostly physicists, chemists and engineers (ideally with a background in nuclear physics or a related field) have been recruited as inspectors. “Safeguards inspectors need adaptability and good judgement. They need to learn quickly and pay attention to details,” says Hilario Munyaradzi, who worked as an in-field inspector for eight and a half years and has spent the past five years training new inspectors. They also need to show discretion, as much of the work they do and the samples they carry are highly confidential. There are different kinds of verification activities — planned/routine inspections, unannounced inspections, complementary access, design information verification (to ensure that no modifications have been made to the facility and that it is being used as declared) and physical inventory verification (to verify the presence of the declared inventory of nuclear material — such as fuel — in the facility). A physical inventory verification at a large facility can be so complex and timeconsuming that it might take up to 10 inspectors 7 to 14 days to complete. During a design information verification, the inspector compares information about the facility’s design that the State has submitted to the IAEA with in-field observations to confirm that the information provided is correct and complete, and the facility has not been misused. Both design information verifications and physical inventory verifications are conducted once a year in most of the 700 facilities that are under IAEA safeguards worldwide. Inspections are also carried out in a selected number of the almost 600 locations outside facilities under IAEA safeguards every year. Inspectors may also need to be present during major activities such as reactor refuelling at nuclear power plants and to work with a wide variety of complex equipment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 Thanks for the lesson ... The last paragraph of your link says under the accord the IAEA can ask for access to Iranian military sites if they believe illicit nuclear related activities are going on there ... So do you know seen as your cock sure if any military bases have been inspected or if access has been given to those bases if asked for ??? ... Its your link and you claimed Iran has kept 100% to the accord so Im just asking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 7:03 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 6:03 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 5:58 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:49 PM So a whole year......Whoopydo pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:51 PM Prolly from those bullets you made How old are you Dave.....serious question? :-S I seriously think the question is relevant :-| ........ So do i.....hence why i asked. Well your bias is pretty clear to everyone on here ;-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 11:23 PM antony1969 - 2018-05-10 9:58 PM Well either your lying or the IAEA is ... According to them inspecting military bases ain't part of the deal regardless wether it's the UN that carries out the inspection on their behalf or not ... Your.link previously posted says so ... Now less bluff let's have the 100% nailed on proof that Iran haven't breached any of the rules ... Your looking a bit silly No Antony it's actually you whose looking very silly and increasingly so. So Israel is making this up?......... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5674503/Israeli-PM-Netanyahu-says-reveal-dramatic-news-Iran-nuclear-deal.html Just askin? ;-) ............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 pelmetman - 2018-05-11 8:48 AM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 11:23 PM antony1969 - 2018-05-10 9:58 PM Well either your lying or the IAEA is ... According to them inspecting military bases ain't part of the deal regardless wether it's the UN that carries out the inspection on their behalf or not ... Your.link previously posted says so ... Now less bluff let's have the 100% nailed on proof that Iran haven't breached any of the rules ... Your looking a bit silly No Antony it's actually you whose looking very silly and increasingly so. So Israel is making this up?......... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5674503/Israeli-PM-Netanyahu-says-reveal-dramatic-news-Iran-nuclear-deal.html Just askin? ;-) ............. Two major things stopping Bulletgay from wanting to believe Iran's not following the rules ... Israel produced the evidence and POTUS Trump acted on it ... The blinkers come on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted May 11, 2018 Author Share Posted May 11, 2018 antony1969 - 2018-05-11 6:17 AM Thanks for the lesson ... The last paragraph of your link says under the accord the IAEA can ask for access to Iranian military sites if they believe illicit nuclear related activities are going on there ... So do you know seen as your cock sure if any military bases have been inspected or if access has been given to those bases if asked for ??? ... As yet you've still not shown any credible source to prove the opposite. What part of the below do you not understand? Iran is subject to the world’s most robust nuclear verification regime under the JCPOA, which is a significant verification gain. As of today, the IAEA can confirm that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented by Iran. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano dated 9th May 2018 The IAEA also reported of Iran's compliance with the nuclear deal; “The Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material at the nuclear facilities and locations outside facilities where nuclear material is customarily used (LOFs) declared by Iran under its Safeguards Agreement.” “Evaluations regarding the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities for Iran remained ongoing. Since Implementation Day, the Agency has been verifying and monitoring the implementation by Iran of its nuclear-related commitments under the JCPOA.” Iran has not pursued construction of its Arak heavy water research reactor. It hasn’t produced or tested natural uranium pellets, fuel pins or assemblies designed for the reactor. antony1969 - 2018-05-11 6:17 AM Its your link and you claimed Iran has kept 100% to the accord so Im just asking Please quote the post where i stated that. pelmetman - 2018-05-11 8:43 AM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 7:03 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 6:03 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 5:58 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:49 PM So a whole year......Whoopydo pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:51 PM Prolly from those bullets you made How old are you Dave.....serious question? :-S I seriously think the question is relevant :-| ........ So do i.....hence why i asked. Well your bias is pretty clear to everyone on here ;-) .......... I'm afraid your reply makes no sense at all......and you posted that at 8.43am. Are you drinking alcohol at breakfast now too? antony1969 - 2018-05-11 9:24 AM pelmetman - 2018-05-11 8:48 AM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 11:23 PM antony1969 - 2018-05-10 9:58 PM Well either your lying or the IAEA is ... According to them inspecting military bases ain't part of the deal regardless wether it's the UN that carries out the inspection on their behalf or not ... Your.link previously posted says so ... Now less bluff let's have the 100% nailed on proof that Iran haven't breached any of the rules ... Your looking a bit silly No Antony it's actually you whose looking very silly and increasingly so. So Israel is making this up?......... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5674503/Israeli-PM-Netanyahu-says-reveal-dramatic-news-Iran-nuclear-deal.html Just askin? ;-) ............. Two major things stopping Bulletguy from wanting to believe Iran's not following the rules ... Israel produced the evidence and POTUS Trump acted on it ... The blinkers come on No Antony i'm just not as easily misled as you by Trump rhetoric. The US told UK they had "evidence" of wmd's in Iraq which led us into a war with them. UK government were told by weapons inspectors who had been in Iraq that there was no evidence of any but government didn't want to listen and bowed to it's US 'master' instead. US/UK had their war......and still to this day no wmd's ever found. History has a nasty habit of repeating itself and you seem determined to go back down that futile route again. Go and stand on the frontline if you want war. Ever questioned how many nuclear weapons or facilities Israel has? Nobody knows for certain because Israel has refused to sign the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons despite international pressure to do so yet Israel remains the only country in the Middle East believed to possess them. It's about time Israel began abiding by 'the rules' too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antony1969 Posted May 11, 2018 Share Posted May 11, 2018 Bulletguy - 2018-05-11 3:47 PM antony1969 - 2018-05-11 6:17 AM Thanks for the lesson ... The last paragraph of your link says under the accord the IAEA can ask for access to Iranian military sites if they believe illicit nuclear related activities are going on there ... So do you know seen as your cock sure if any military bases have been inspected or if access has been given to those bases if asked for ??? ... As yet you've still not shown any credible source to prove the opposite. What part of the below do you not understand? Iran is subject to the world’s most robust nuclear verification regime under the JCPOA, which is a significant verification gain. As of today, the IAEA can confirm that the nuclear-related commitments are being implemented by Iran. IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano dated 9th May 2018 The IAEA also reported of Iran's compliance with the nuclear deal; “The Agency continues to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material at the nuclear facilities and locations outside facilities where nuclear material is customarily used (LOFs) declared by Iran under its Safeguards Agreement.” “Evaluations regarding the absence of undeclared nuclear material and activities for Iran remained ongoing. Since Implementation Day, the Agency has been verifying and monitoring the implementation by Iran of its nuclear-related commitments under the JCPOA.” Iran has not pursued construction of its Arak heavy water research reactor. It hasn’t produced or tested natural uranium pellets, fuel pins or assemblies designed for the reactor. antony1969 - 2018-05-11 6:17 AM Its your link and you claimed Iran has kept 100% to the accord so Im just asking Please quote the post where i stated that. pelmetman - 2018-05-11 8:43 AM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 7:03 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 6:03 PM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 5:58 PM pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:49 PM So a whole year......Whoopydo pelmetman - 2018-05-10 5:51 PM Prolly from those bullets you made How old are you Dave.....serious question? :-S I seriously think the question is relevant :-| ........ So do i.....hence why i asked. Well your bias is pretty clear to everyone on here ;-) .......... I'm afraid your reply makes no sense at all......and you posted that at 8.43am. Are you drinking alcohol at breakfast now too? antony1969 - 2018-05-11 9:24 AM pelmetman - 2018-05-11 8:48 AM Bulletguy - 2018-05-10 11:23 PM antony1969 - 2018-05-10 9:58 PM Well either your lying or the IAEA is ... According to them inspecting military bases ain't part of the deal regardless wether it's the UN that carries out the inspection on their behalf or not ... Your.link previously posted says so ... Now less bluff let's have the 100% nailed on proof that Iran haven't breached any of the rules ... Your looking a bit silly No Antony it's actually you whose looking very silly and increasingly so. So Israel is making this up?......... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5674503/Israeli-PM-Netanyahu-says-reveal-dramatic-news-Iran-nuclear-deal.html Just askin? ;-) ............. Two major things stopping Bulletguy from wanting to believe Iran's not following the rules ... Israel produced the evidence and POTUS Trump acted on it ... The blinkers come on No Antony i'm just not as easily misled as you by Trump rhetoric. The US told UK they had "evidence" of wmd's in Iraq which led us into a war with them. UK government were told by weapons inspectors who had been in Iraq that there was no evidence of any but government didn't want to listen and bowed to it's US 'master' instead. US/UK had their war......and still to this day no wmd's ever found. History has a nasty habit of repeating itself and you seem determined to go back down that futile route again. Go and stand on the frontline if you want war. Ever questioned how many nuclear weapons or facilities Israel has? Nobody knows for certain because Israel has refused to sign the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons despite international pressure to do so yet Israel remains the only country in the Middle East believed to possess them. It's about time Israel began abiding by 'the rules' too. Im not interested in what POTUS Trump says regarding Iran or your suggestion that Israel doesnt play fair ... My initial response to you was regarding your post claiming Iran were fulfilling its duty in complying with the terms set out regarding nuclear capabilities ... You said they were complying and I have asked you if military bases have been checked and youve fudged it ... Have military bases been checked yes or no ... It aint difficult fella Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.