Jeremy Corbyn

[John52]

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time.

These are people who are supposedly groomed from birth, no expense spared, to represent their country.

Surrounded by minders and spin doctors at their subject's expernse.

Is 20 year old too young for them to realise its not ok to strut around in a Nazi uniform?

Anybody else could have been sacked.

But their subjects can't sack them - thats the point.

They, plus all their extended family and hangers on, plus all their descendents, plus all their descendants extended families and hangers on, will be forced on to their subjects - however bad they turn out to be.

Their subjects can't get rid of them.

And yet we are supposed to be living in a Democracy.

 

[John52]

RogerC - 2017-12-01 8:42 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 2:06 PM

antony1969 - 2017-11-30 1:26 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 11:28 AMWell of course thise who believe in Democracy can still address in the Unelected Royals in a civilised manner.Just because you disagree with the system doesn't mean you disrespect those who take advantage of it.I disagreed with the demutualisation of the Building Societies, and voted against it. But I figured that since I couldn't stop it, and somebody was going to profit from it, that might as well be me. So I took the windfall money, and I don't blame others who did. But I still think the demutaualisation was wrong.

Your no different to any other plastic socialist John ... Don't beat yourself up about it

Oh I don't. Neither will I fall into your trap of attacking people personally for taking advantage of an unfair system. Like them I've done that myself. But that in no way stops me from wanting a fairer system.

100% hypocrite. 

Roger I put forward a reasoned argument and all you can respond with is name calling.

[John52]

pelmetman - 2017-12-02 9:33 AM

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5138181/DOMINIC-SANDBROOK-John-McDonell-threatens-Britain.html

 

Sounds like someone who's so "left" he's right up your street John? >:-) .........

 

 

Tax exile Desmond of the Mail is one of the richest 1% who would be worse off under a Corbyn Government. How can you continually quote him as a reliable unbiased source of information?

[antony1969]

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

I heard it on the radio ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/jeremy-corbyn-accused-having-ostrich-strategy-anti-semitism/ ... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/27/naz-shah-suspended-labour-party-antisemitism-row ... More if you really want it

[John52]

pelmetman - 2017-12-02 8:28 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

 

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time. He's 31 now and matured enough to have seen the error his offensive foolishness caused.

 

He only offended those who like to be offended ;-) .......

 

It gives them a chance to stamp their little feet and have another hissy fit (lol) (lol) (lol) .......

 

 

Do you realise you are saying you didn't find Prince Harry strutting around in a Nazi uniform to be offensive?

And deriding all those who did find it offensive?

[Guest pelmetman]

John52 - 2017-12-02 11:16 AM

 

pelmetman - 2017-12-02 8:28 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

 

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time. He's 31 now and matured enough to have seen the error his offensive foolishness caused.

 

He only offended those who like to be offended ;-) .......

 

It gives them a chance to stamp their little feet and have another hissy fit (lol) (lol) (lol) .......

 

 

Do you realise you are saying you didn't find Prince Harry strutting around in a Nazi uniform to be offensive?

And deriding all those who did find it offensive?

 

Yep ;-) ....... that's because I have a sense of humour.......unlike you loony lefties (lol) ........

 

 

[John52]

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 10:47 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

I heard it on the radio ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/jeremy-corbyn-accused-having-ostrich-strategy-anti-semitism/ ... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/27/naz-shah-suspended-labour-party-antisemitism-row ... More if you really want it

 

Well neither of those links, even the Torygraph, show what you claimed.

Israel is a small country, surrounded by hostile large countries. Although I would rather live in Israel than any of its neighbours, there is no denying Israel has used some dirty tricks to keep its neighbours at bay. Probably understandable when you consider they remember the Holocaust they may be determined - whatever the cost - to avoid it happening again. Principles and fair play are easier for those of us who can afford them. War is a dirty business, and sometimes you have to fight dirty or lose.

But the fact remains Israel has done some dirty tricks.

Pointing that out is not ' continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community' .

Those in the Labour party who have gone to far have been suspended after a proper investigation. Taking the time for a proper investigastion before suspending somebody may well be described by a Corbyn hostile press as 'finally forced to act'

[globebuster]

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

 

 

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

John - Would that be like your 'compulsory poppy wearing' claim - or was that a figment of your imagination rather than a reliable source?

 

I know you are a very imaginative individual.........

 

 

 

 

[antony1969]

John52 - 2017-12-02 11:30 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 10:47 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

I heard it on the radio ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/jeremy-corbyn-accused-having-ostrich-strategy-anti-semitism/ ... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/27/naz-shah-suspended-labour-party-antisemitism-row ... More if you really want it

 

Well neither of those links, even the Torygraph, show what you claimed.

Israel is a small country, surrounded by hostile large countries. Although I would rather live in Israel than any of its neighbours, there is no denying Israel has used some dirty tricks to keep its neighbours at bay. Probably understandable when you consider they remember the Holocaust they may be determined - whatever the cost - to avoid it happening again. Principles and fair play are easier for those of us who can afford them. War is a dirty business, and sometimes you have to fight dirty or lose.

But the fact remains Israel has done some dirty tricks.

Pointing that out is not ' continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community' .

Those in the Labour party who have gone to far have been suspended after a proper investigation. Taking the time for a proper investigastion before suspending somebody may well be described by a Corbyn hostile press as 'finally forced to act'

 

You forgot the smiley at the end ... Still funny though ... Nice one

[John52]

globebuster - 2017-12-02 11:44 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

 

 

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

John - Would that be like your 'compulsory poppy wearing' claim - or was that a figment of your imagination rather than a reliable source?

 

I know you are a very imaginative individual.........

 

 

 

 

I will resist your attempt to change the subject since you are losing this one.

If you want to talk about another thread the proper place to post it would be on that thread.

[antony1969]

pelmetman - 2017-12-02 11:30 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 11:16 AM

 

pelmetman - 2017-12-02 8:28 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

 

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time. He's 31 now and matured enough to have seen the error his offensive foolishness caused.

 

He only offended those who like to be offended ;-) .......

 

It gives them a chance to stamp their little feet and have another hissy fit (lol) (lol) (lol) .......

 

 

Do you realise you are saying you didn't find Prince Harry strutting around in a Nazi uniform to be offensive?

And deriding all those who did find it offensive?

 

Yep ;-) ....... that's because I have a sense of humour.......unlike you loony lefties (lol) ........

 

 

Good job our Jewish community don't march on the streets every time someone mocks them or draws jokey cartoon Jewish figures ... Who was that fella who had a cartoon drawn of him and those fellas went out on a murdering spree ???

[John52]

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 12:23 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 11:30 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 10:47 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

I heard it on the radio ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/jeremy-corbyn-accused-having-ostrich-strategy-anti-semitism/ ... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/27/naz-shah-suspended-labour-party-antisemitism-row ... More if you really want it

 

Well neither of those links, even the Torygraph, show what you claimed.

Israel is a small country, surrounded by hostile large countries. Although I would rather live in Israel than any of its neighbours, there is no denying Israel has used some dirty tricks to keep its neighbours at bay. Probably understandable when you consider they remember the Holocaust they may be determined - whatever the cost - to avoid it happening again. Principles and fair play are easier for those of us who can afford them. War is a dirty business, and sometimes you have to fight dirty or lose.

But the fact remains Israel has done some dirty tricks.

Pointing that out is not ' continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community' .

Those in the Labour party who have gone to far have been suspended after a proper investigation. Taking the time for a proper investigastion before suspending somebody may well be described by a Corbyn hostile press as 'finally forced to act'

 

You forgot the smiley at the end ... Still funny though ... Nice one

 

No I didn't forget the Smiley.

I don't find Nazi Uniforms, 'Anti-Semetic Hatred or the Holocaust funny.

[antony1969]

John52 - 2017-12-02 12:36 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 12:23 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 11:30 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 10:47 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

I heard it on the radio ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/jeremy-corbyn-accused-having-ostrich-strategy-anti-semitism/ ... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/27/naz-shah-suspended-labour-party-antisemitism-row ... More if you really want it

 

Well neither of those links, even the Torygraph, show what you claimed.

Israel is a small country, surrounded by hostile large countries. Although I would rather live in Israel than any of its neighbours, there is no denying Israel has used some dirty tricks to keep its neighbours at bay. Probably understandable when you consider they remember the Holocaust they may be determined - whatever the cost - to avoid it happening again. Principles and fair play are easier for those of us who can afford them. War is a dirty business, and sometimes you have to fight dirty or lose.

But the fact remains Israel has done some dirty tricks.

Pointing that out is not ' continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community' .

Those in the Labour party who have gone to far have been suspended after a proper investigation. Taking the time for a proper investigastion before suspending somebody may well be described by a Corbyn hostile press as 'finally forced to act'

 

You forgot the smiley at the end ... Still funny though ... Nice one

 

No I didn't forget the Smiley.

I don't find Nazi Uniforms, 'Anti-Semetic Hatred or the Holocaust funny.

 

But most of all above all that you hate Prince Harry more ... You forgot to mention that

[John52]

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 12:40 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 12:36 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 12:23 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 11:30 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 10:47 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

I heard it on the radio ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/09/25/jeremy-corbyn-accused-having-ostrich-strategy-anti-semitism/ ... https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/27/naz-shah-suspended-labour-party-antisemitism-row ... More if you really want it

 

Well neither of those links, even the Torygraph, show what you claimed.

Israel is a small country, surrounded by hostile large countries. Although I would rather live in Israel than any of its neighbours, there is no denying Israel has used some dirty tricks to keep its neighbours at bay. Probably understandable when you consider they remember the Holocaust they may be determined - whatever the cost - to avoid it happening again. Principles and fair play are easier for those of us who can afford them. War is a dirty business, and sometimes you have to fight dirty or lose.

But the fact remains Israel has done some dirty tricks.

Pointing that out is not ' continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community' .

Those in the Labour party who have gone to far have been suspended after a proper investigation. Taking the time for a proper investigastion before suspending somebody may well be described by a Corbyn hostile press as 'finally forced to act'

 

You forgot the smiley at the end ... Still funny though ... Nice one

 

No I didn't forget the Smiley.

I don't find Nazi Uniforms, 'Anti-Semetic Hatred or the Holocaust funny.

 

But most of all above all that you hate Prince Harry more ... You forgot to mention that

 

I don't hate Prince Harry. I attack the unfair system. Not the individuals (like myself) who take advantage of the unfair system.

[globebuster]

John52 - 2017-12-02 12:33 PM

 

globebuster - 2017-12-02 11:44 AM

 

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:25 AM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

 

 

That claim would be more convincing if you could quote some of it from a reliable source.

 

John - Would that be like your 'compulsory poppy wearing' claim - or was that a figment of your imagination rather than a reliable source?

 

I know you are a very imaginative individual.........

 

 

 

 

I will resist your attempt to change the subject since you are losing this one.

If you want to talk about another thread the proper place to post it would be on that thread.

 

Don't resist John it's not in your nature!

 

In case you hadn't realised - you change the subject in just about every thread you get involved with, and always in relation to your favourite obsessions.

 

Any opportunity you get to quote someone [usually out of context] to feed those obsessions, you take

 

Get over it............hypocrite

 

 

[RogerC]

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:32 AM

RogerC - 2017-12-01 8:42 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 2:06 PM

antony1969 - 2017-11-30 1:26 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 11:28 AMWell of course thise who believe in Democracy can still address in the Unelected Royals in a civilised manner.Just because you disagree with the system doesn't mean you disrespect those who take advantage of it.I disagreed with the demutualisation of the Building Societies, and voted against it. But I figured that since I couldn't stop it, and somebody was going to profit from it, that might as well be me. So I took the windfall money, and I don't blame others who did. But I still think the demutaualisation was wrong.

Your no different to any other plastic socialist John ... Don't beat yourself up about it

Oh I don't. Neither will I fall into your trap of attacking people personally for taking advantage of an unfair system. Like them I've done that myself. But that in no way stops me from wanting a fairer system.

100% hypocrite. 

Roger I put forward a reasoned argument and all you can respond with is name calling.

Reasoned argument?  No John you were admitting to taking advantage of a system you clearly disprove of, and rather consistently and strongly at that.

 

I am not name calling John I am stating 'fact'.  You pontificate about so much that you deem is wrong with the ways of the world and then 'admit' to taking advantage of it's flaws.  So what is it:

Rail against the system or take advantage of it?  As you state categorically that you have taken advantage of it's failings I say clearly and unequivocally that your actions/words/deeds are by your own admission those of a 100% hypocrite.

[Bulletguy]

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-01 7:08 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-01 6:50 PM

 

And were you speaking on behalf of your country when you said you liked Prince Harry in his Nazi uniform? (quote above)

 

Yes on behalf of every single person.

Well you don't.

 

He was heavily castigated over it by Michael Howard who was leader of the Tory party at the time and from Romanian Jewish parentage, the Israeli foreign minister, and survivors of the concentration camps, some of whom live in the UK but don't let that small matter concern you. *-)

 

Clarence house also issued a written statement apologising for any offence caused.

 

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time. He's 31 now and matured enough to have seen the error his offensive foolishness caused.

 

The full time offended are selective at times ...

Yes i'm selective when it comes to others claiming to 'speak on behalf of...' and offended, justifiably so, when you claim to be speaking "on behalf of every single person".

 

You do not speak for me and neither for 'every single person' so you can cut with the bombastic pompous pronouncements.

 

Years ago a youth as you point out wears a German military uniform as part of a drunken fancy dress and your still carrying on about it while The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

Pointing out an indisputable fact in one single post hardly constitutes 'carrying on' about something. Try your incessant obsession posting streams of Islamaphobic posts for an example of that.

[antony1969]

Bulletguy - 2017-12-02 4:00 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-01 7:08 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-01 6:50 PM

 

And were you speaking on behalf of your country when you said you liked Prince Harry in his Nazi uniform? (quote above)

 

Yes on behalf of every single person.

Well you don't.

 

He was heavily castigated over it by Michael Howard who was leader of the Tory party at the time and from Romanian Jewish parentage, the Israeli foreign minister, and survivors of the concentration camps, some of whom live in the UK but don't let that small matter concern you. *-)

 

Clarence house also issued a written statement apologising for any offence caused.

 

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time. He's 31 now and matured enough to have seen the error his offensive foolishness caused.

 

The full time offended are selective at times ...

Yes i'm selective when it comes to others claiming to 'speak on behalf of...' and offended, justifiably so, when you claim to be speaking "on behalf of every single person".

 

You do not speak for me and neither for 'every single person' so you can cut with the bombastic pompous pronouncements.

 

Years ago a youth as you point out wears a German military uniform as part of a drunken fancy dress and your still carrying on about it while The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

Pointing out an indisputable fact in one single post hardly constitutes 'carrying on' about something. Try your incessant obsession posting streams of Islamaphobic posts for an example of that.

 

Its been a couple of days but you got it in "Islamaphobic" ... Sure missed that old friend ... You can go clean yourself down now

[Bulletguy]

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 4:59 PM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-02 4:00 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-01 7:08 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-01 6:50 PM

 

And were you speaking on behalf of your country when you said you liked Prince Harry in his Nazi uniform? (quote above)

 

Yes on behalf of every single person.

Well you don't.

 

He was heavily castigated over it by Michael Howard who was leader of the Tory party at the time and from Romanian Jewish parentage, the Israeli foreign minister, and survivors of the concentration camps, some of whom live in the UK but don't let that small matter concern you. *-)

 

Clarence house also issued a written statement apologising for any offence caused.

 

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time. He's 31 now and matured enough to have seen the error his offensive foolishness caused.

 

The full time offended are selective at times ...

Yes i'm selective when it comes to others claiming to 'speak on behalf of...' and offended, justifiably so, when you claim to be speaking "on behalf of every single person".

 

You do not speak for me and neither for 'every single person' so you can cut with the bombastic pompous pronouncements.

 

Years ago a youth as you point out wears a German military uniform as part of a drunken fancy dress and your still carrying on about it while The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

Pointing out an indisputable fact in one single post hardly constitutes 'carrying on' about something. Try your incessant obsession posting streams of Islamaphobic posts for an example of that.

 

Its been a couple of days but you got it in "Islamaphobic" ... Sure missed that old friend ... You can go clean yourself down now.

I'm not going to type 'dislike, hostility and prejudice against Muslims' when one word sufficiently and correctly explains what you obviously understand just as you use the word 'antisemitic' which has the same meaning, but applies to Jewish people.

 

Another day passed and still no terrorist attacks in Huddersfield? Any bombs been dropped on hospitals and schools there yet? Seems pretty quiet up there.

[John52]

RogerC - 2017-12-02 2:27 PM

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:32 AM

RogerC - 2017-12-01 8:42 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 2:06 PM

antony1969 - 2017-11-30 1:26 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 11:28 AMWell of course thise who believe in Democracy can still address in the Unelected Royals in a civilised manner.Just because you disagree with the system doesn't mean you disrespect those who take advantage of it.I disagreed with the demutualisation of the Building Societies, and voted against it. But I figured that since I couldn't stop it, and somebody was going to profit from it, that might as well be me. So I took the windfall money, and I don't blame others who did. But I still think the demutaualisation was wrong.

Your no different to any other plastic socialist John ... Don't beat yourself up about it

Oh I don't. Neither will I fall into your trap of attacking people personally for taking advantage of an unfair system. Like them I've done that myself. But that in no way stops me from wanting a fairer system.

100% hypocrite. 

Roger I put forward a reasoned argument and all you can respond with is name calling.

Reasoned argument?  No John you were admitting to taking advantage of a system you clearly disprove of, and rather consistently and strongly at that.

 

I am not name calling John I am stating 'fact'.  You pontificate about so much that you deem is wrong with the ways of the world and then 'admit' to taking advantage of it's flaws.  So what is it:

Rail against the system or take advantage of it?  As you state categorically that you have taken advantage of it's failings I say clearly and unequivocally that your actions/words/deeds are by your own admission those of a 100% hypocrite.

When I take advantage of the unfair system I am accused of being a hypocriteWhen I don't take advantage of the unfair system I am accused of being jealous and bitter.So I can't criticise an unfair system without being personally attacked.

[RogerC]

John52 - 2017-12-02 7:22 PM

RogerC - 2017-12-02 2:27 PM

John52 - 2017-12-02 10:32 AM

RogerC - 2017-12-01 8:42 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 2:06 PM

antony1969 - 2017-11-30 1:26 PM

John52 - 2017-11-30 11:28 AMWell of course thise who believe in Democracy can still address in the Unelected Royals in a civilised manner.Just because you disagree with the system doesn't mean you disrespect those who take advantage of it.I disagreed with the demutualisation of the Building Societies, and voted against it. But I figured that since I couldn't stop it, and somebody was going to profit from it, that might as well be me. So I took the windfall money, and I don't blame others who did. But I still think the demutaualisation was wrong.

Your no different to any other plastic socialist John ... Don't beat yourself up about it

Oh I don't. Neither will I fall into your trap of attacking people personally for taking advantage of an unfair system. Like them I've done that myself. But that in no way stops me from wanting a fairer system.

100% hypocrite. 

Roger I put forward a reasoned argument and all you can respond with is name calling.

Reasoned argument?  No John you were admitting to taking advantage of a system you clearly disprove of, and rather consistently and strongly at that.

 

I am not name calling John I am stating 'fact'.  You pontificate about so much that you deem is wrong with the ways of the world and then 'admit' to taking advantage of it's flaws.  So what is it:

Rail against the system or take advantage of it?  As you state categorically that you have taken advantage of it's failings I say clearly and unequivocally that your actions/words/deeds are by your own admission those of a 100% hypocrite.

When I take advantage of the unfair system I am accused of being a hypocriteWhen I don't take advantage of the unfair system I am accused of being jealous and bitter.So I can't criticise an unfair system without being personally attacked.

Well hypocrisy is: "The practice of claiming to have higher standards or more noble beliefs than is the case".

Your almost predictable raving against so many things, homelessness, lack of housing, unfair distribution of wealth etc etc says a lot about you and what you believe is right.  However when it comes to practising what you preach from your own keyboard you say those higher beliefs/moral standing go out the window if it means you benefit from 'playing the system' you so despise.  Therefore it is clear you are practising, in my opinion, hypocrisy of the worst kind because you seem to want to 'champion' the underdog yet you are quite prepared to feather your own financial nest when the opportunity (one that you claim to be unfair) arises.

The comments regarding you to be bitter and twisted do not stem from you not taking advantage of whatever opportunity arises because unless you tell us no one knows what you do to further your own ends.  However when you champion your causes/beliefs and then demonstrate they actually don't really count for much when it is you that benefits then John....then you leave yourself open to judgement.  In this case Hypocracy?  Guilty M'lud.  Take him down.  http://www.faithinhisblood.org/uploads/2/8/5/1/28510639/6982548_orig.gif

[antony1969]

Bulletguy - 2017-12-02 5:20 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 4:59 PM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-02 4:00 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-02 6:46 AM

 

Bulletguy - 2017-12-01 8:34 PM

 

antony1969 - 2017-12-01 7:08 PM

 

John52 - 2017-12-01 6:50 PM

 

And were you speaking on behalf of your country when you said you liked Prince Harry in his Nazi uniform? (quote above)

 

Yes on behalf of every single person.

Well you don't.

 

He was heavily castigated over it by Michael Howard who was leader of the Tory party at the time and from Romanian Jewish parentage, the Israeli foreign minister, and survivors of the concentration camps, some of whom live in the UK but don't let that small matter concern you. *-)

 

Clarence house also issued a written statement apologising for any offence caused.

 

Harry was a 20 year old youth at the time. He's 31 now and matured enough to have seen the error his offensive foolishness caused.

 

The full time offended are selective at times ...

Yes i'm selective when it comes to others claiming to 'speak on behalf of...' and offended, justifiably so, when you claim to be speaking "on behalf of every single person".

 

You do not speak for me and neither for 'every single person' so you can cut with the bombastic pompous pronouncements.

 

Years ago a youth as you point out wears a German military uniform as part of a drunken fancy dress and your still carrying on about it while The Labour Party today has members that continually spew anti-Semitic hatred towards our Jewish community

Pointing out an indisputable fact in one single post hardly constitutes 'carrying on' about something. Try your incessant obsession posting streams of Islamaphobic posts for an example of that.

 

Its been a couple of days but you got it in "Islamaphobic" ... Sure missed that old friend ... You can go clean yourself down now.

I'm not going to type 'dislike, hostility and prejudice against Muslims' when one word sufficiently and correctly explains what you obviously understand just as you use the word 'antisemitic' which has the same meaning, but applies to Jewish people.

 

Another day passed and still no terrorist attacks in Huddersfield? Any bombs been dropped on hospitals and schools there yet? Seems pretty quiet up there.

 

Given you've posted in my name on here ... Told the forum quite chillingly your finished with me and now you've searched out my home address I think it's me and my family that are more likely targets than schools and hospitals by some mad stalker ... Your comment about the schools and hospitals actually is quite sick and says much about you

[DavidGJH]

Dianne Abbott visited Vincent Nichols, Archbishop of Westminster.

 

She told the Archbishop that The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP would be attending the next day's Mass and she asked if the Archbishop would kindly point him out to the congregation and say a few words that would include calling The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP a saint.

 

The Archbishop replied, "No. I don't really like the man and there are issues of conflict with the Catholic Church over certain of his views."

 

Abbott then said, "Look, I'll write a cheque here and now for a donation of £250,000 to your church if you'll just tell the congregation that you see The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP as a saint."

 

The Archbishop thought about it and said, "Well, the church can use the money, so I'll work your request into tomorrow's sermon."

 

As Abbott had indicated, The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP appeared for the Sunday worship and seated himself prominently at the forward left side of the centre aisle.

 

As promised, at the start of his sermon, the Archbishop pointed out that The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP was present.

 

The Archbishop went on to explain to the congregation, "While The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP’s presence is probably an honour to some, the man is not numbered among my personal favourite personages. Some of his most egregious views are contrary to tenets of the Church and he tends to flip-flop on many other issues. The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP is a petty, self-absorbed hypocrite, a thumb sucker and a nit-wit. He is also a serial liar, a cheat and a thief. I must say, The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP is the worst example of a Christian I have ever personally witnessed.. He falsely obtained Union money and is using this wealth to lie to the British People. He also has a reputation for shirking his representative obligations. The man is simply not to be trusted.

 

The Archbishop concluded, "but, when compared with Dianne Abbott, The Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP is a saint."

 

 

 

 

Proudly supporting Her Majesty’s Armed Forces which, for over a hundred years have continuously fought to secure freedom for millions threatened by the evils of Fascism, Communism and religious oppression, have fought against genocide in Bosnia, Kosovo, the Middle East and countries in North Africa, and whose many humanitarian operations have save tens of thousands of lives.

 

[Tracker]

Well done David for trying to break the endless pompous and hypocritical posturing cycle that this topic has descended into.

 

In my view the moderator should delete the entire thread.

[Barryd999]

Leave them alone! They are enjoying themselves. (lol)

 

I need more popcorn though.