Barryd999 Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 4:38 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 2:54 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 2:43 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:23 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 1:05 PM It is perfectly reasonable that a DPP lays claim to prosecutions s/he has brought against criminals of whatever type. It is their decision whether or not a prosecution should proceed. That does not mean that the DPP him or her self appears as the prosecution counsel in court. It is a team effort with the DPP calling the shots. Then he is also responsible for Jimmy Saville escaping justice and allowing the Asian/Muslim grooming gangs to carry on raping 1000's of children when he was in charge? >:-( ......... Bump? :-| ........... So, what in God's name is your gripe with Starmer having specialised as a defence barrister? Is it that you don't think there should be defence barristers, that you don't think there should be a defence at all, that you don't like Starmer, that you don't like like anyone who is the Labour leader, that you don't think there should be a Labour party, that you don't think there should be an opposition party, that you think Starmer should have chosen a different career, should not have become a barrister, that he shouldn't have become a defence barrister in case he had to defend people you don't like, that he should have foreseen that Shiner (who was previously elected solicitor of the year) had gone rogue before it was revealed, that he shouldn't have become DPP, that he shouldn't have stood as an MP and got elected, that he shouldn't have stood as Corbyn's replacement as Labour leader, that he shouldn't have been born, that he should have chosen his parents more carefully, or just that he should sometimes allow Boris to win? Why don't you try answering the question instead of deflecting Brian? >:-) ............ Two things. First, bearing in mind I asked first, why should I do for you what you have not done for me? Second, I neither know no care what role Starmer had in this, or that, case - nor do I intend to begin looking. A journey starts with a single step. If, somewhere, you trip, or stumble, but nevertheless arrive, you have still gained your objective. I'm not counting steps, but looking at the journey. So with the traveller. One false step by a traveller (if, indeed, there was one - something you have yet to prove) does not devalue the journey they made. You distrust Starmer because he may (or may not) have fallen short (in your opinion - but see below) on a couple of cases. And yet, you implicitly trust Johnson (and Trump for that matter) both of whom have very tenuous relationships with truth, integrity, or honour. Doesn't quite leave you as the ideal person to head an inquisition, does it? :-D I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... I prefer my moral compass to yours.......... Just sayin https://tinyurl.com/PMSLpelmet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 5:14 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:05 PM Barryd999 - 2020-10-26 3:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 2:43 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:23 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 1:05 PM It is perfectly reasonable that a DPP lays claim to prosecutions s/he has brought against criminals of whatever type. It is their decision whether or not a prosecution should proceed. That does not mean that the DPP him or her self appears as the prosecution counsel in court. It is a team effort with the DPP calling the shots. Then he is also responsible for Jimmy Saville escaping justice and allowing the Asian/Muslim grooming gangs to carry on raping 1000's of children when he was in charge? >:-( ......... Bump? :-| ........... So, what in God's name is your gripe with Starmer having specialised as a defence barrister? Is it that you don't think there should be defence barristers, that you don't think there should be a defence at all, that you don't like Starmer, that you don't like like anyone who is the Labour leader, that you don't think there should be a Labour party, that you don't think there should be an opposition party, that you think Starmer should have chosen a different career, should not have become a barrister, that he shouldn't have become a defence barrister in case he had to defend people you don't like, that he should have foreseen that Shiner (who was previously elected solicitor of the year) had gone rogue before it was revealed, that he shouldn't have become DPP, that he shouldn't have stood as an MP and got elected, that he shouldn't have stood as Corbyn's replacement as Labour leader, that he shouldn't have been born, that he should have chosen his parents more carefully, or just that he should sometimes allow Boris to win? I suspect he is bored Brian and finds it amusing to wind up the sensible members on here with bonkers wild accusations about Keir Starmer. Pelmet would make a good reporter on the Daily Star or maybe even the Sun. "Keir Starmer ate my Hamster". Why are you Monkeys trying to stop Brian from speaking for himself? :D ......... Surely if Snakey Starmer claims the kudos of the CPS successes as his own ;-) ......... Then surely he also owns its F*ckups >:-) ......... Now I'm really confused! :-D Your allegation hitherto has been that he failed to prosecute any terrorists. I've explained as best I can how the process works. So now you switch to holding him responsible for cases that failed, or were not brought. So, what, actually is your gripe? I've given you a good range of choices to explain your obsession above, but answer comes there none. You do know that before bringing a case there has to be evidence, and a reasonable suspicion of guilt? You do realise that the decision to prosecute is based on an assessment of the grounds for suspicion and the reliability of the evidence/witnesses? Do you know why those cases were actually not brought, or were dropped, or lost? Have you even checked if Starmer was involved in the Savile prosecution decisions? Here's a Wiki on Savile: https://tinyurl.com/y3w8rr7w Have a read and see if you can spot when Starmer might have become involved as DPP. He became DPP on 1/11/08. Savile died 29/10/11, so you've only got to look at three years. Yep I'd already read that Brian ;-) ......... I see he blamed those lawyers who were overlooking the case *-) ........ So what is his excuse for ignoring the rape of children for years?.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 4:38 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 2:54 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 2:43 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:23 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 1:05 PM It is perfectly reasonable that a DPP lays claim to prosecutions s/he has brought against criminals of whatever type. It is their decision whether or not a prosecution should proceed. That does not mean that the DPP him or her self appears as the prosecution counsel in court. It is a team effort with the DPP calling the shots. Then he is also responsible for Jimmy Saville escaping justice and allowing the Asian/Muslim grooming gangs to carry on raping 1000's of children when he was in charge? >:-( ......... Bump? :-| ........... So, what in God's name is your gripe with Starmer having specialised as a defence barrister? Is it that you don't think there should be defence barristers, that you don't think there should be a defence at all, that you don't like Starmer, that you don't like like anyone who is the Labour leader, that you don't think there should be a Labour party, that you don't think there should be an opposition party, that you think Starmer should have chosen a different career, should not have become a barrister, that he shouldn't have become a defence barrister in case he had to defend people you don't like, that he should have foreseen that Shiner (who was previously elected solicitor of the year) had gone rogue before it was revealed, that he shouldn't have become DPP, that he shouldn't have stood as an MP and got elected, that he shouldn't have stood as Corbyn's replacement as Labour leader, that he shouldn't have been born, that he should have chosen his parents more carefully, or just that he should sometimes allow Boris to win? Why don't you try answering the question instead of deflecting Brian? >:-) ............ Two things. First, bearing in mind I asked first, why should I do for you what you have not done for me? Second, I neither know no care what role Starmer had in this, or that, case - nor do I intend to begin looking. A journey starts with a single step. If, somewhere, you trip, or stumble, but nevertheless arrive, you have still gained your objective. I'm not counting steps, but looking at the journey. So with the traveller. One false step by a traveller (if, indeed, there was one - something you have yet to prove) does not devalue the journey they made. You distrust Starmer because he may (or may not) have fallen short (in your opinion - but see below) on a couple of cases. And yet, you implicitly trust Johnson (and Trump for that matter) both of whom have very tenuous relationships with truth, integrity, or honour. Doesn't quite leave you as the ideal person to head an inquisition, does it? :-D I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ When will you ever learn? The UK Communists, Marists & Leninists are Brexit backers you dumbnut. *-) How many more times do you need to be told? They are your Brexit friends. This has been common knowledge the past four years......do keep up. *-) https://www.cpbml.org.uk/leave Can you show evidence that Sir Keir Starmer is a Communist? You can't can you so it's just another day in the mad world of Potty Pelmet. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Barryd999 - 2020-10-26 5:15 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 4:38 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 2:54 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 2:43 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:23 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 1:05 PM It is perfectly reasonable that a DPP lays claim to prosecutions s/he has brought against criminals of whatever type. It is their decision whether or not a prosecution should proceed. That does not mean that the DPP him or her self appears as the prosecution counsel in court. It is a team effort with the DPP calling the shots. Then he is also responsible for Jimmy Saville escaping justice and allowing the Asian/Muslim grooming gangs to carry on raping 1000's of children when he was in charge? >:-( ......... Bump? :-| ........... So, what in God's name is your gripe with Starmer having specialised as a defence barrister? Is it that you don't think there should be defence barristers, that you don't think there should be a defence at all, that you don't like Starmer, that you don't like like anyone who is the Labour leader, that you don't think there should be a Labour party, that you don't think there should be an opposition party, that you think Starmer should have chosen a different career, should not have become a barrister, that he shouldn't have become a defence barrister in case he had to defend people you don't like, that he should have foreseen that Shiner (who was previously elected solicitor of the year) had gone rogue before it was revealed, that he shouldn't have become DPP, that he shouldn't have stood as an MP and got elected, that he shouldn't have stood as Corbyn's replacement as Labour leader, that he shouldn't have been born, that he should have chosen his parents more carefully, or just that he should sometimes allow Boris to win? Why don't you try answering the question instead of deflecting Brian? >:-) ............ Two things. First, bearing in mind I asked first, why should I do for you what you have not done for me? Second, I neither know no care what role Starmer had in this, or that, case - nor do I intend to begin looking. A journey starts with a single step. If, somewhere, you trip, or stumble, but nevertheless arrive, you have still gained your objective. I'm not counting steps, but looking at the journey. So with the traveller. One false step by a traveller (if, indeed, there was one - something you have yet to prove) does not devalue the journey they made. You distrust Starmer because he may (or may not) have fallen short (in your opinion - but see below) on a couple of cases. And yet, you implicitly trust Johnson (and Trump for that matter) both of whom have very tenuous relationships with truth, integrity, or honour. Doesn't quite leave you as the ideal person to head an inquisition, does it? :-D I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... I prefer my moral compass to yours.......... Just sayin https://tinyurl.com/PMSLpelmet He needs that goo inside his skull examined.....there's something wrong. https://tinyurl.com/y3kcmsyz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 5:27 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 4:38 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 2:54 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 2:43 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:23 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 1:05 PM It is perfectly reasonable that a DPP lays claim to prosecutions s/he has brought against criminals of whatever type. It is their decision whether or not a prosecution should proceed. That does not mean that the DPP him or her self appears as the prosecution counsel in court. It is a team effort with the DPP calling the shots. Then he is also responsible for Jimmy Saville escaping justice and allowing the Asian/Muslim grooming gangs to carry on raping 1000's of children when he was in charge? >:-( ......... Bump? :-| ........... So, what in God's name is your gripe with Starmer having specialised as a defence barrister? Is it that you don't think there should be defence barristers, that you don't think there should be a defence at all, that you don't like Starmer, that you don't like like anyone who is the Labour leader, that you don't think there should be a Labour party, that you don't think there should be an opposition party, that you think Starmer should have chosen a different career, should not have become a barrister, that he shouldn't have become a defence barrister in case he had to defend people you don't like, that he should have foreseen that Shiner (who was previously elected solicitor of the year) had gone rogue before it was revealed, that he shouldn't have become DPP, that he shouldn't have stood as an MP and got elected, that he shouldn't have stood as Corbyn's replacement as Labour leader, that he shouldn't have been born, that he should have chosen his parents more carefully, or just that he should sometimes allow Boris to win? Why don't you try answering the question instead of deflecting Brian? >:-) ............ Two things. First, bearing in mind I asked first, why should I do for you what you have not done for me? Second, I neither know no care what role Starmer had in this, or that, case - nor do I intend to begin looking. A journey starts with a single step. If, somewhere, you trip, or stumble, but nevertheless arrive, you have still gained your objective. I'm not counting steps, but looking at the journey. So with the traveller. One false step by a traveller (if, indeed, there was one - something you have yet to prove) does not devalue the journey they made. You distrust Starmer because he may (or may not) have fallen short (in your opinion - but see below) on a couple of cases. And yet, you implicitly trust Johnson (and Trump for that matter) both of whom have very tenuous relationships with truth, integrity, or honour. Doesn't quite leave you as the ideal person to head an inquisition, does it? :-D I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ When will you ever learn? The UK Communists, Marists & Leninists are Brexit backers you dumbnut. *-) How many more times do you need to be told? They are your Brexit friends. This has been common knowledge the past four years......do keep up. *-) https://www.cpbml.org.uk/leave Can you show evidence that Sir Keir Starmer is a Communist? You can't can you so it's just another day in the mad world of Potty Pelmet. *-) Hmmm......a bloke who edits a Trotskyist magazine and thinks we dont need the normal police is not a Communist??? >:-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 5:40 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 5:27 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 4:38 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 2:54 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 2:43 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:23 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 1:05 PM It is perfectly reasonable that a DPP lays claim to prosecutions s/he has brought against criminals of whatever type. It is their decision whether or not a prosecution should proceed. That does not mean that the DPP him or her self appears as the prosecution counsel in court. It is a team effort with the DPP calling the shots. Then he is also responsible for Jimmy Saville escaping justice and allowing the Asian/Muslim grooming gangs to carry on raping 1000's of children when he was in charge? >:-( ......... Bump? :-| ........... So, what in God's name is your gripe with Starmer having specialised as a defence barrister? Is it that you don't think there should be defence barristers, that you don't think there should be a defence at all, that you don't like Starmer, that you don't like like anyone who is the Labour leader, that you don't think there should be a Labour party, that you don't think there should be an opposition party, that you think Starmer should have chosen a different career, should not have become a barrister, that he shouldn't have become a defence barrister in case he had to defend people you don't like, that he should have foreseen that Shiner (who was previously elected solicitor of the year) had gone rogue before it was revealed, that he shouldn't have become DPP, that he shouldn't have stood as an MP and got elected, that he shouldn't have stood as Corbyn's replacement as Labour leader, that he shouldn't have been born, that he should have chosen his parents more carefully, or just that he should sometimes allow Boris to win? Why don't you try answering the question instead of deflecting Brian? >:-) ............ Two things. First, bearing in mind I asked first, why should I do for you what you have not done for me? Second, I neither know no care what role Starmer had in this, or that, case - nor do I intend to begin looking. A journey starts with a single step. If, somewhere, you trip, or stumble, but nevertheless arrive, you have still gained your objective. I'm not counting steps, but looking at the journey. So with the traveller. One false step by a traveller (if, indeed, there was one - something you have yet to prove) does not devalue the journey they made. You distrust Starmer because he may (or may not) have fallen short (in your opinion - but see below) on a couple of cases. And yet, you implicitly trust Johnson (and Trump for that matter) both of whom have very tenuous relationships with truth, integrity, or honour. Doesn't quite leave you as the ideal person to head an inquisition, does it? :-D I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ When will you ever learn? The UK Communists, Marists & Leninists are Brexit backers you dumbnut. *-) How many more times do you need to be told? They are your Brexit friends. This has been common knowledge the past four years......do keep up. *-) https://www.cpbml.org.uk/leave Can you show evidence that Sir Keir Starmer is a Communist? You can't can you so it's just another day in the mad world of Potty Pelmet. *-) Hmmm......a bloke who edits a Trotskyist magazine and thinks we dont need the normal police is not a Communist??? >:-) ........ You're in bed with the lot of 'em.....UKIP, Fartages Paypal party, and the Tory party. The Tories have long rubbed shoulders with the Ruskies and Commies and even formed their own club. Comrade Cummings takes his instructions from the Brexit Supreme Leader, Putin. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/nov/30/activities-of-conservative-friends-of-russia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 5:59 PM You're in bed with the lot of 'em.....UKIP, Fartages Paypal party, and the Tory party. The Tories have long rubbed shoulders with the Ruskies and Commies and even formed their own club. Comrade Cummings takes his instructions from the Brexit Supreme Leader, Putin. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2012/nov/30/activities-of-conservative-friends-of-russia Yeah Dumb Dumb *-) ......... I was turned when I went to Soviet Odessa in 75 with the Navy (lol) (lol) (lol) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Kirby Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM ........................................... whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... Haven't been relying on this, have you Dave? https://tinyurl.com/y2kbyx42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:20 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM ........................................... whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... Haven't been relying on this, have you Dave? https://tinyurl.com/y2kbyx42 Nope........But you obviously are, to muddy the waters for Snakey Starmer *-) ........ Shame on you....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Kirby Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin 1 Yes, we know that. What is more important is whether it is true. What evidence do you have that he is a communist? One article in a mag when he was a student? 2 I neither trust, nor distrust, him. Why would I do either? Because he favours EU membership is laughable. 16,141,241 people voted remain. On that basis you assume that I trust all of them? Really? 3 I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? 4 With your record of hitching your wagon to anything going your way, on any pretext, however reprehensible, ditto! :-D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin 1 Yes, we know that. What is more important is whether it is true. What evidence do you have that he is a communist? One article in a mag when he was a student? 2 I neither trust, nor distrust, him. Why would I do either? Because he favours EU membership is laughable. 16,141,241 people voted remain. On that basis you assume that I trust all of them? Really? 3 I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? 4 With your record of hitching your wagon to anything going your way, on any pretext, however reprehensible, ditto! :-D 1.....He was a "editor" of a Trotskyist magazine ;-)....... 2......You're defending him and will prolly vote for him because he's a Remoaner like you :D .... 3......Right wing panic???........Blimey I never knew my posts had so much power (lol) (lol) (lol) ....... 4......I'll always hitch my wagon to any that is going in the RIGHT direction B-) ...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 5:24 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 5:14 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:05 PM Barryd999 - 2020-10-26 3:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 2:43 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 1:23 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 1:05 PM It is perfectly reasonable that a DPP lays claim to prosecutions s/he has brought against criminals of whatever type. It is their decision whether or not a prosecution should proceed. That does not mean that the DPP him or her self appears as the prosecution counsel in court. It is a team effort with the DPP calling the shots. Then he is also responsible for Jimmy Saville escaping justice and allowing the Asian/Muslim grooming gangs to carry on raping 1000's of children when he was in charge? >:-( ......... Bump? :-| ........... So, what in God's name is your gripe with Starmer having specialised as a defence barrister? Is it that you don't think there should be defence barristers, that you don't think there should be a defence at all, that you don't like Starmer, that you don't like like anyone who is the Labour leader, that you don't think there should be a Labour party, that you don't think there should be an opposition party, that you think Starmer should have chosen a different career, should not have become a barrister, that he shouldn't have become a defence barrister in case he had to defend people you don't like, that he should have foreseen that Shiner (who was previously elected solicitor of the year) had gone rogue before it was revealed, that he shouldn't have become DPP, that he shouldn't have stood as an MP and got elected, that he shouldn't have stood as Corbyn's replacement as Labour leader, that he shouldn't have been born, that he should have chosen his parents more carefully, or just that he should sometimes allow Boris to win? I suspect he is bored Brian and finds it amusing to wind up the sensible members on here with bonkers wild accusations about Keir Starmer. Pelmet would make a good reporter on the Daily Star or maybe even the Sun. "Keir Starmer ate my Hamster". Why are you Monkeys trying to stop Brian from speaking for himself? :D ......... Surely if Snakey Starmer claims the kudos of the CPS successes as his own ;-) ......... Then surely he also owns its F*ckups >:-) ......... Now I'm really confused! :-D Your allegation hitherto has been that he failed to prosecute any terrorists. I've explained as best I can how the process works. So now you switch to holding him responsible for cases that failed, or were not brought. So, what, actually is your gripe? I've given you a good range of choices to explain your obsession above, but answer comes there none. You do know that before bringing a case there has to be evidence, and a reasonable suspicion of guilt? You do realise that the decision to prosecute is based on an assessment of the grounds for suspicion and the reliability of the evidence/witnesses? Do you know why those cases were actually not brought, or were dropped, or lost? Have you even checked if Starmer was involved in the Savile prosecution decisions? Here's a Wiki on Savile: https://tinyurl.com/y3w8rr7w Have a read and see if you can spot when Starmer might have become involved as DPP. He became DPP on 1/11/08. Savile died 29/10/11, so you've only got to look at three years. Yep I'd already read that Brian ;-) ......... I see he blamed those lawyers who were overlooking the case *-) ........ So what is his excuse for ignoring the rape of children for years?.......... You never did answer this question Brian? :-| ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... You don't want to believe the edited sound bites your Lefty rags feed you >:-) ......... It seems to me its you LOSERS who are getting all excited :D ....... You clearly don't like Comrade Snakey Starmer failings or his unsavory history being exposed (lol) (lol) (lol) ....... Well get used to it >:-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:59 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Defeat????? :-S .......... Have we not left the EU? ;-) ........ Does Boris not have a 80 seat majority in parliament? B-) ....... Are we not just 66 days away from the end of the transition period? >:-) ........ Seems to me you have a cockeyed idea of defeat (lol) (lol) (lol) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:15 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:59 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Defeat????? :-S .......... In response to the below; because you changed the subject and avoided it......thats always a sign you've conceded defeat, so thanks again, That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 9:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:15 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:59 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Defeat????? :-S .......... In response to the below; because you changed the subject and avoided it......thats always a sign you've conceded defeat, so thanks again, That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. Did Boris edit a Trotsykist magazine like Comrade Snakey Starmer?........ Did Boris say we don't need the police like Comrade Snakey Starmer?....... Did Boris grovel on his knees to the BLM Marxists like Comrade Snakey Starmer?......... NO! >:-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 9:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:15 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:59 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Defeat????? :-S .......... In response to the below; because you changed the subject and avoided it......thats always a sign you've conceded defeat, so thanks again, That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. Did Boris edit a Trotsykist magazine like Comrade Snakey Starmer?........ Did Boris say we don't need the police like Comrade Snakey Starmer?....... Did Boris grovel on his knees to the BLM Marxists like Comrade Snakey Starmer?......... NO! >:-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 26, 2020 Share Posted October 26, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:34 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 9:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:15 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:59 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Defeat????? :-S .......... In response to the below; because you changed the subject and avoided it......thats always a sign you've conceded defeat, so thanks again, That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. Did Boris edit a Trotsykist magazine like Comrade Snakey Starmer?........ Did Boris say we don't need the police like Comrade Snakey Starmer?....... Did Boris grovel on his knees to the BLM Marxists like Comrade Snakey Starmer?......... NO! >:-) ......... You've already had the answer to that earlier today from Brian yet you're still frantically scratching around for anything and so manically obsessed you've started yet another thread on Starmer today! There's something wrong in your head. Brian was right, your right wing (i'd term it far right!) paranoia over Starmer is fueled by a deep insecurity and you see Sir Keir as a very real threat to Johnson and the Tories. You struggle to counter his political points as does Johnson, so make wild exaggerated, derogatory, claims in the hope the some mud might stick and a few thick folk might believe the same tripe as you. Quite where you source your garbage from i've no idea but it's certainly not from any reliable credible sources, no doubt right wing extremist blogs. We don't know because you never link your mad paranoid claims! Quite why you've got a downer on Commies, Trotskies and Marxists i've no idea because they're Brexit supporters! You really are seriously mixed up and should go for a lie down with a Bovril. (lol) You really ought to put your own house in order because Johnsons reputation is diabolical, a sexist, racist, Islamophobe, pathological liar whose been sacked from most jobs he's had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 10:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:34 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 9:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:15 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:59 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Defeat????? :-S .......... In response to the below; because you changed the subject and avoided it......thats always a sign you've conceded defeat, so thanks again, That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. Did Boris edit a Trotsykist magazine like Comrade Snakey Starmer?........ Did Boris say we don't need the police like Comrade Snakey Starmer?....... Did Boris grovel on his knees to the BLM Marxists like Comrade Snakey Starmer?......... NO! >:-) ......... You've already had the answer to that earlier today from Brian yet you're still frantically scratching around for anything and so manically obsessed you've started yet another thread on Starmer today! There's something wrong in your head. Brian was right, your right wing (i'd term it far right!) paranoia over Starmer is fueled by a deep insecurity and you see Sir Keir as a very real threat to Johnson and the Tories. You struggle to counter his political points as does Johnson, so make wild exaggerated, derogatory, claims in the hope the some mud might stick and a few thick folk might believe the same tripe as you. Quite where you source your garbage from i've no idea but it's certainly not from any reliable credible sources, no doubt right wing extremist blogs. We don't know because you never link your mad paranoid claims! Quite why you've got a downer on Commies, Trotskies and Marxists i've no idea because they're Brexit supporters! You really are seriously mixed up and should go for a lie down with a Bovril. (lol) You really ought to put your own house in order because Johnsons reputation is diabolical, a sexist, racist, Islamophobe, pathological liar whose been sacked from most jobs he's had. Just because Snakey Starmer was able to fool simple Socilalists into thinking he's not a Communist ;-) ...... Doesn't mean he'll be able to fool the rest of us :D .......... He's had a easy ride so far.........It wont be the same in a election, especially when he wont have a pandemic to weaponise and he'll have his time as a lefty lawyer defending terrorists, and his time at the DPP allowing Savile and child rapsists to escape justice for years put under the microscope >:-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 How do you explain the fact that Sir Jimmy Savile KCSG, Child Rapist & OBE, was staying with his friend Prince Charles, or spending Christmas at Chequers with his friend the Tory Prime Minister, before Kier Starmer had even qualified Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 John52 - 2020-10-27 10:19 AM How do you explain the fact that Sir Jimmy Savile KCSG, Child Rapist & OBE, was staying with his friend Prince Charles, or spending Christmas at Chequers with his friend the Tory Prime Minister, before Kier Starmer had even qualified How do you explain Snakey Starmer failing to charge Savile whilst he was DPP? >:-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.