Bulletguy Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-27 9:16 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 10:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:34 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 9:24 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 9:15 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:59 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 8:27 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 8:21 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 7:52 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-26 7:47 PM Brian Kirby - 2020-10-26 6:52 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-26 4:49 PM.......................................... 1 I distrust Starmer because he's yet another Commie who has taken over the leadership of Labour ;-) ........ 2 You trust him because he's a Remoaner like you *-) ........ 3 Which is why you're prepared to believe his claims of prosecuting terrorists, whilst ignoring his inaction over kids being raped for years :-| ......... 4 I prefer my moral compass to yours..........Just sayin I neither believe nor disbelieve him. I note that most of your claims come from very right wing sources. Since I distrust political extremists, I check your claims about him for accuracy, since you can't be bothered to do that before you post them. Not very encouraging results so far. All I see is evidence of right wing panic that he is more effective in opposition than Corbyn (which is hardly a huge achievement). Why does anyone make exaggerated, derogatory, claims about someone else? Because they represent a threat. Why are they a threat? Because they are doing better than the incumbent. So if you think Starmer is more competent than your boy, you need to examine your boy, don't you? Pelmets paranoia is totally off the scale. No doubt has Stormfront bookmarked. :-| So Commie spotting is now called paranoia? :D ........ Why are you Commies afraid of admitting you are Commies? >:-) ........ Is it because you know no one would vote for you if you came out? :D ........ Your paranoia over Starmer is off the scale, much for the reasons Brian mentions and i've said in other posts, because he shreds Johnson. That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. (lol) Have you watched PMQS? ;-) ....... Many times. Btw i noticed you changed the subject so it's safe to conclude that as another admission of defeat. (lol) You don't want to believe the edited sound bites my right wing rags feed you >:-) ......... Couldn't agree more....we never believe any of the tripe they pump out! But it worked on you and got you parroting all the Brexity garbage. *-) Defeat????? :-S .......... In response to the below; because you changed the subject and avoided it......thats always a sign you've conceded defeat, so thanks again, That he makes a pigs ear of everything he touches, is a pathological liar, been sacked from almost every job he's had, and bone idle is irrelevant to you as all you're interested in is his oven ready Brexit. Why you keep droning on and on and on about Commies in a derogatory manner is baffling but amusing as you're putting down Brexit supporters! You need to get up to speed on things, the entire UK Communist party along with Marxists and Leninists are Brexiteers. Did Boris edit a Trotsykist magazine like Comrade Snakey Starmer?........ Did Boris say we don't need the police like Comrade Snakey Starmer?....... Did Boris grovel on his knees to the BLM Marxists like Comrade Snakey Starmer?......... NO! >:-) ......... You've already had the answer to that earlier today from Brian yet you're still frantically scratching around for anything and so manically obsessed you've started yet another thread on Starmer today! There's something wrong in your head. Brian was right, your right wing (i'd term it far right!) paranoia over Starmer is fueled by a deep insecurity and you see Sir Keir as a very real threat to Johnson and the Tories. You struggle to counter his political points as does Johnson, so make wild exaggerated, derogatory, claims in the hope the some mud might stick and a few thick folk might believe the same tripe as you. Quite where you source your garbage from i've no idea but it's certainly not from any reliable credible sources, no doubt right wing extremist blogs. We don't know because you never link your mad paranoid claims! Quite why you've got a downer on Commies, Trotskies and Marxists i've no idea because they're Brexit supporters! You really are seriously mixed up and should go for a lie down with a Bovril. (lol) You really ought to put your own house in order because Johnsons reputation is diabolical, a sexist, racist, Islamophobe, pathological liar whose been sacked from most jobs he's had. Just because Snakey Starmer was able to fool simple Socilalists into thinking he's not a Communist ;-) ...... Doesn't mean he'll be able to fool the rest of us :D .......... He's had a easy ride so far.........It wont be the same in a election, especially when he wont have a pandemic to weaponise and he'll have his time as a lefty lawyer defending terrorists, and his time at the DPP allowing Savile and child rapsists to escape justice for years put under the microscope >:-) ........ You need to start backing up your allegations from reliable credible sources to show proof Pelmet. All they've been are wild spurious allegations you've picked up off some right wing extremist nutjob blogs feeding your paranoia about Starmer. What you're alleging is pretty serious and you need to bear that in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-27 11:11 AM John52 - 2020-10-27 10:19 AM How do you explain the fact that Sir Jimmy Savile KCSG, Child Rapist & OBE, was staying with his friend Prince Charles, or spending Christmas at Chequers with his friend the Tory Prime Minister, before Kier Starmer had even qualified How do you explain Snakey Starmer failing to charge Savile whilst he was DPP? >:-) ........ Before someone can be charged with an offence police have to build a case. Operation Yewtree which uncovered the extent of Saviles offending began in October 2012. Savile had already been dead a year by then. You cannot charge or bring a dead person into court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 1:54 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-27 11:11 AM John52 - 2020-10-27 10:19 AM How do you explain the fact that Sir Jimmy Savile KCSG, Child Rapist & OBE, was staying with his friend Prince Charles, or spending Christmas at Chequers with his friend the Tory Prime Minister, before Kier Starmer had even qualified How do you explain Snakey Starmer failing to charge Savile whilst he was DPP? >:-) ........ Before someone can be charged with an offence police have to build a case. Operation Yewtree which uncovered the extent of Saviles offending began in October 2012. Savile had already been dead a year by then. You cannot charge or bring a dead person into court. LOL! (lol) Top Skewering there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Barryd999 - 2020-10-27 2:05 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 1:54 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-27 11:11 AM John52 - 2020-10-27 10:19 AM How do you explain the fact that Sir Jimmy Savile KCSG, Child Rapist & OBE, was staying with his friend Prince Charles, or spending Christmas at Chequers with his friend the Tory Prime Minister, before Kier Starmer had even qualified How do you explain Snakey Starmer failing to charge Savile whilst he was DPP? >:-) ........ Before someone can be charged with an offence police have to build a case. Operation Yewtree which uncovered the extent of Saviles offending began in October 2012. Savile had already been dead a year by then. You cannot charge or bring a dead person into court. LOL! (lol) Top Skewering there. "Mr Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) when the decision not to prosecute Savile was made on the grounds of “insufficient evidence”. The allegations against Savile were dealt with by local police and a reviewing lawyer for the CPS." https://fullfact.org/online/keir-starmer-prosecute-jimmy-savile/ It appears Sneeky Snakey only claims responsibility for CPS staff who don't F*ckup *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-27 3:11 PM Barryd999 - 2020-10-27 2:05 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 1:54 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-27 11:11 AM John52 - 2020-10-27 10:19 AM How do you explain the fact that Sir Jimmy Savile KCSG, Child Rapist & OBE, was staying with his friend Prince Charles, or spending Christmas at Chequers with his friend the Tory Prime Minister, before Kier Starmer had even qualified How do you explain Snakey Starmer failing to charge Savile whilst he was DPP? >:-) ........ Before someone can be charged with an offence police have to build a case. Operation Yewtree which uncovered the extent of Saviles offending began in October 2012. Savile had already been dead a year by then. You cannot charge or bring a dead person into court. LOL! (lol) Top Skewering there. "Mr Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) when the decision not to prosecute Savile was made on the grounds of “insufficient evidence”. The allegations against Savile were dealt with by local police and a reviewing lawyer for the CPS." https://fullfact.org/online/keir-starmer-prosecute-jimmy-savile/ It appears Sneeky Snakey only claims responsibility for CPS staff who don't F*ckup *-) Jeez Pelmet your paranoia has spiralled out of control. *-) Do you understand the meaning of 'insufficient evidence'? It means the CPS do not have enough evidence concerning a case with which to proceed. The police are responsible for gathering evidence and presenting it to the CPS. Their team of lawyers then have to decide if the evidence presented to them is sufficient to achieve a prosecution. Your link states; A later investigation criticised the actions of both the CPS and the police in their handling of the situation. It did not suggest that Mr Starmer was personally involved in the decisions made. Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too? Once again you've allowed your political bias to cloud all logic and reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 He didn't have the evidence. The case of Lord Archer had silenced the press. It had cost the Daily Star over a million pounds (at a time when the average house price was £25k) just for truthfully printing that Lord Archer had given money to a working girl. Imagine how much Sir Jimmy Savile OBE Child Rapist and Knight of the Garter could have got if they had printed the truth about him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted October 27, 2020 Share Posted October 27, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too? Evidence? ;-) .......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Or the Lefty Lawyer Leader of the Labour party who turned a blind eye to Pedo allegations and still rewarded a Labour MP with a knighthood 8-) .......... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8886601/Tony-Blair-admits-nominating-former-MP-Janner-peerage-despite-knowing-child-sex-abuse-claims.html There seems to be a bit of a theme developing with Lefty Lawyer Labour Leaders and kiddy fiddlers? >:-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-28 8:54 AM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Or the Lefty Lawyer Leader of the Labour party who turned a blind eye to Pedo allegations and still rewarded a Labour MP with a knighthood 8-) .......... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8886601/Tony-Blair-admits-nominating-former-MP-Janner-peerage-despite-knowing-child-sex-abuse-claims.html There seems to be a bit of a theme developing with Lefty Lawyer Labour Leaders and kiddy fiddlers? >:-) ......... So the Daily Mail is trying to take attention away from BoJo by smearing Starmer. Only thing they seem to have found is that not every crook was detected and prosecuted whilst he was DPP What a surprise *-) Do you have any reliable sources by the way? as adblock plus blocks Daily Mail adverts because it deems them 'unacceptable' Daily Mail can't afford to be choosy about who they accept adverts from since reputable companies stopped advertising in the Daily Mail as they no longer wanted to be associated with them. But you can't read the Daily Mail without them. So I am deprived of reading the Daily Mail :-D If its true why can't you quote another source ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-28 8:49 AM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too? Evidence? ;-) .......... On the internet.....search it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Saviles best pal Margaret Thatcher, nominated him FOUR times for a Knighthood before it was accepted. She'd been advised against putting his name forward but her and Savile were mates and she was determined to honour him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Says it all when they ignore BoJo & Cummings to focus on Keir Starmer - and the worst they can dig up on him is not all crooks were detected and charged when he was DPP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 12:50 PM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Saviles best pal Margaret Thatcher, nominated him FOUR times for a Knighthood before it was accepted. She'd been advised against putting his name forward but her and Savile were mates and she was determined to honour him. Imagine the Daily Mail if that had been Jeremy Corbyn or Keir Starmer 8-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 John52 - 2020-10-28 9:34 AM pelmetman - 2020-10-28 8:54 AM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Or the Lefty Lawyer Leader of the Labour party who turned a blind eye to Pedo allegations and still rewarded a Labour MP with a knighthood 8-) .......... https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8886601/Tony-Blair-admits-nominating-former-MP-Janner-peerage-despite-knowing-child-sex-abuse-claims.html There seems to be a bit of a theme developing with Lefty Lawyer Labour Leaders and kiddy fiddlers? >:-) ......... So the Daily Mail is trying to take attention away from BoJo by smearing Starmer. Of course it is! The Tories are in deep mire tearing themselves apart with a clown at the helm whose no match at all for Starmer who presents a very real threat to ending the Tories reign as government. They used the 'antisemitic' card against Corbyn and the usual rags hopped on the bandwagon and it worked. Result - Corbyn no longer leader and all of a sudden the 'antisemitism' which was said to be rife in the LP, has suddenly vanished! Never mentioned now, not a pipsqueak out of the smearers. So clowns like Pelmet think they can try the same trick again over Starmer, only what they're indulging is libelous and defamatory. There's a deep insecurity within the Torykippers and as has been said elsewhere, instead of wasting time tearing themselves up with paranoia over the opposition leaders work history as a barrister and DPP, they should concentrate on addressing their own leaders weaknesses and shortcomings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 John52 - 2020-10-28 1:13 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 12:50 PM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Saviles best pal Margaret Thatcher, nominated him FOUR times for a Knighthood before it was accepted. She'd been advised against putting his name forward but her and Savile were mates and she was determined to honour him. Imagine the Daily Mail if that had been Jeremy Corbyn or Keir Starmer 8-) DM covered it though they report she made five attempts to nominate him where others reported four. Both the Torygraph and Times also covered it. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10184512/Thatcher-aides-warned-against-Savile-knighthood.html https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/advisers-warned-thatcher-against-knighting-savile-tthcxzhx87n https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2366576/Revealed-Lady-Thatchers-FIVE-attempts-secure-knighthood-Jimmy-Savile.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 12:50 PM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Saviles best pal Margaret Thatcher, nominated him FOUR times for a Knighthood before it was accepted. She'd been advised against putting his name forward but her and Savile were mates and she was determined to honour him. Naturally you can link to a genuine website to back up your claims? ;-) .......... Coz none of Joke52's will open? :-S ........ Correction......The Daily Mails did :D .......... Which begs the question if Saviles unsavory history was so well known within the establishment ;-) ........ Why didn't Snakey Starmer investigate further? >:-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-28 2:54 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 12:50 PM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Saviles best pal Margaret Thatcher, nominated him FOUR times for a Knighthood before it was accepted. She'd been advised against putting his name forward but her and Savile were mates and she was determined to honour him. Naturally you can link to a genuine website to back up your claims? ;-) .......... Open your eyes....there's three above your post. *-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 3:28 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-28 2:54 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 12:50 PM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Saviles best pal Margaret Thatcher, nominated him FOUR times for a Knighthood before it was accepted. She'd been advised against putting his name forward but her and Savile were mates and she was determined to honour him. Naturally you can link to a genuine website to back up your claims? ;-) .......... Open your eyes....there's three above your post. *-) Which is why I corrected my post ;-) ......... So why do you think Sneaky Snakey didn't persue any claims against Savile? ;-) ........ Perhaps Savile and the legal profession knew he'd take a few judges/Politcians/Lords down with him? >:-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-28 3:36 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 3:28 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-28 2:54 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 12:50 PM John52 - 2020-10-27 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-27 3:40 PM Savile had been questioned many times before Starmer became DPP so why aren't you screaming about those DPP's too?. Or the Tory PM who spent Christmas with him at her home and got him a knighthood >:-) Saviles best pal Margaret Thatcher, nominated him FOUR times for a Knighthood before it was accepted. She'd been advised against putting his name forward but her and Savile were mates and she was determined to honour him. Naturally you can link to a genuine website to back up your claims? ;-) .......... Open your eyes....there's three above your post. *-) Which is why I corrected my post ;-) ......... So why do you think Sneaky Snakey didn't persue any claims against Savile? ;-) ........ Perhaps Savile and the legal profession knew he'd take a few judges/Politcians/Lords down with him? >:-) ........ You've had all this explained to you God knows how many times now but you've shown you have absolutely zero concept of the way basic law works and aren't interested because it doesn't fit your narrative. Brian has way more patience with you than I do and he's also explained, but you're being purposely obtuse. Savile was clever, he courted pillars of the establishment for good reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 3:57 PM Savile was clever, he courted pillars of the establishment for good reason. Yeah he was and he why he did ;-) ......... Which is prolly why Sneaky Snakey and the establishment didn't do anything until after he'd snuffed it >:-) ........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-28 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 3:57 PM Savile was clever, he courted pillars of the establishment for good reason. Yeah he was and he why he did ;-) ......... Try again. *-) Which is prolly why Sneaky Snakey and the establishment didn't do anything until after he'd snuffed it >:-) ........ Thatcher knew of his predilections and had the power to do something.......so rewarded him with a Knighthood. I never heard you complaining about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 4:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-28 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 3:57 PM Savile was clever, he courted pillars of the establishment for good reason. Yeah he was and he why he did ;-) ......... Try again. *-) Which is prolly why Sneaky Snakey and the establishment didn't do anything until after he'd snuffed it >:-) ........ Thatcher knew of his predilections and had the power to do something.......so rewarded him with a Knighthood. I never heard you complaining about that. I suspect Thatcher was told lots of things by the establishment ;-) .......... It appears it was those who had the power in the establishment that stopped him from getting a knighthood and then gave him a knighthood.........and also prevented him from being prosecuted >:-) ....... Clearly Sneaky Snakey didn't want to rock the boat when he joined the establishment >:-) ......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 pelmetman - 2020-10-28 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 4:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-28 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 3:57 PM Savile was clever, he courted pillars of the establishment for good reason. Yeah he was and he why he did ;-) ......... Try again. *-) Which is prolly why Sneaky Snakey and the establishment didn't do anything until after he'd snuffed it >:-) ........ Thatcher knew of his predilections and had the power to do something.......so rewarded him with a Knighthood. I never heard you complaining about that. I suspect Thatcher was told lots of things by the establishment ;-) .......... It appears it was those who had the power in the establishment that stopped him from getting a knighthood and then gave him a knighthood.........and also prevented him from being prosecuted >:-) ....... Clearly Sneaky Snakey didn't want to rock the boat when he joined the establishment >:-) ......... She was advised against nominating Savile for his Knighthood by Downing street aides but she ignored them and persisted, putting his name forward no less than four times. Aides are mere underlings and as PM she had authority they didn't. So there was no doubt over what she did. You've had the role of Prosecutor explained to you over and over and over again and also during Saviles active years, there were six other DPP's prior to Sir Keir Starmer being appointed you've overlooked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pelmetman Posted October 28, 2020 Share Posted October 28, 2020 Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 4:42 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-28 4:19 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 4:11 PM pelmetman - 2020-10-28 4:04 PM Bulletguy - 2020-10-28 3:57 PM Savile was clever, he courted pillars of the establishment for good reason. Yeah he was and he why he did ;-) ......... Try again. *-) Which is prolly why Sneaky Snakey and the establishment didn't do anything until after he'd snuffed it >:-) ........ Thatcher knew of his predilections and had the power to do something.......so rewarded him with a Knighthood. I never heard you complaining about that. I suspect Thatcher was told lots of things by the establishment ;-) .......... It appears it was those who had the power in the establishment that stopped him from getting a knighthood and then gave him a knighthood.........and also prevented him from being prosecuted >:-) ....... Clearly Sneaky Snakey didn't want to rock the boat when he joined the establishment >:-) ......... She was advised against nominating Savile for his Knighthood by Downing street aides but she ignored them and persisted, putting his name forward no less than four times. Aides are mere underlings and as PM she had authority they didn't. So there was no doubt over what she did. You've had the role of Prosecutor explained to you over and over and over again and also during Saviles active years, there were six other DPP's prior to Sir Keir Starmer being appointed you've overlooked. Acksurely ;-) ......... You have highlighted how our Prime Ministers can be overuled by the Establishment 8-) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.