Bulletguy Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 Twitter has now locked Rep. Lauren Boeberts account. Boebert, a QAnon freak had live tweeted Nancy Pelosi's location in the Capitol building during the invasion. https://www.rawstory.com/lauren-boebert-twitter-locked/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 Impeached......for the SECOND time. So he goes with that on his record as the only US President in history to be impeached twice. Ten Reps voted to impeach.....obviously there are some with a conscience. https://news.sky.com/story/trump-impeachment-live-house-of-representatives-hearing-second-case-against-outgoing-president-12186819 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 8:02 PM jumpstart - 2021-01-13 7:57 PM Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 7:46 PM Page 8 of this thread and not one of the sisters has shown anything other than their pure hatred to back up their claims ... Wow What a hooooot....got your eyes open yet ? My eyes are open thanks ... Still looking and waiting after 8 pages for one single bit of evidence ??? ... No point getting you all dizzy and asking to provide it though ... Given your intelligence levels ya prolly dont know who Trump is ... Go back to sleep princess Did you not watch the link I cued up for you? Trump, Giuliani and Trump Jr all inciting the crowd to violence. Everyone around the world has seen it and it would appear that the vast majority agree, it was incitement. What happens next I guess will depend on the judicial process in America. With any luck they will all get thrown in jail. Either way if you cannot see whats been put in front of you as clear evidence of incitement that led to a Terrorist attack on the heart of democracy then you are in denial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malc d Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 Bulletguy - 2021-01-13 9:38 PM Ten Reps voted to impeach.....obviously there are some with a conscience. If I were a Republican and my career - and possibly even my life - was at stake- I'm not sure how I would have voted. :-| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bulletguy Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 malc d - 2021-01-13 10:39 PM Bulletguy - 2021-01-13 9:38 PM Ten Reps voted to impeach.....obviously there are some with a conscience. If I were a Republican and my career - and possibly even my life - was at stake- I'm not sure how I would have voted. :-| It's a very volatile and dangerous situation which has been ignited by Trump with Giuliani and Trump Jr acting as his little echoes. That Trump showed zero remorse over the insurrection but instead went on to gaslight the gullible and blame shift to Pelosi and Schumer, infuriated many Reps. Security fencing and barrier has gone up all round Mike Pences house and troops are already inside the Capitol building. As someone pointed out, the country isn't under threat of attack from a foreign force but it's own citizens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 Bulletguy - 2021-01-13 11:07 PM malc d - 2021-01-13 10:39 PM Bulletguy - 2021-01-13 9:38 PM Ten Reps voted to impeach.....obviously there are some with a conscience. If I were a Republican and my career - and possibly even my life - was at stake- I'm not sure how I would have voted. :-| It's a very volatile and dangerous situation which has been ignited by Trump with Giuliani and Trump Jr acting as his little echoes. That Trump showed zero remorse over the insurrection but instead went on to gaslight the gullible and blame shift to Pelosi and Schumer, infuriated many Reps. Security fencing and barrier has gone up all round Mike Pences house and troops are already inside the Capitol building. As someone pointed out, the country isn't under threat of attack from a foreign force but it's own citizens. I watched the half hour ITV report you posted earlier just now. Storming the Capitol. Its insane. Trump has a lot to answer for. This is radicalisation in its most dangerous form. Trump has become no better than those Terrorist leaders around the world that the west declared war on. Its simply shocking that it has come to this but not surprising. He has ensured with this radicalisation and his ridiculous fraud campaign that his legacy will tear the country apart. This is what you get when you elect extremists. I do not envy Biden and Harris trying to put their country back together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Barryd999 - 2021-01-13 9:41 PM Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 8:02 PM jumpstart - 2021-01-13 7:57 PM Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 7:46 PM Page 8 of this thread and not one of the sisters has shown anything other than their pure hatred to back up their claims ... Wow What a hooooot....got your eyes open yet ? My eyes are open thanks ... Still looking and waiting after 8 pages for one single bit of evidence ??? ... No point getting you all dizzy and asking to provide it though ... Given your intelligence levels ya prolly dont know who Trump is ... Go back to sleep princess Did you not watch the link I cued up for you? Trump, Giuliani and Trump Jr all inciting the crowd to violence. Everyone around the world has seen it and it would appear that the vast majority agree, it was incitement. What happens next I guess will depend on the judicial process in America. With any luck they will all get thrown in jail. Either way if you cannot see whats been put in front of you as clear evidence of incitement that led to a Terrorist attack on the heart of democracy then you are in denial. Yes ... What part exactly of the link are you on about ??? ... Your hypocrisy is unbelievable ... "I dont give a toss about America" when its blatantly obvious you do, well you give a toss about one American ... You condemn others for supposedly inciting violence without showing any proof to back up the claim while finding UK thuggery, violence and criminality "funny" and Union Flag burning is a "photo opportunity" ... Keep on "not giving a toss" Barry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Given the sisters on here are all mainly rabid Corbynites and to be fair we do have some anti-Semites n'all do the girls believe like many do that the sharp increase in anti-Semitism and the rise of attacks on Jews in the UK while Jeremy Corbyn was leader of a fairly open anti-Semitic party was partly or all down to him ??? ... I think I know the answer already but many others do blame him and if him and his party is to blame then surely they incited hatred and incited violence, something Jeremy acknowledged through his disgraceful response to the report and something Sure Queer Stammer acknowledges with his speech about not wanting the likes of Barry in the party anymore ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jumpstart Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-01-14 7:02 AM Given the sisters on here are all mainly rabid Corbynites and to be fair we do have some anti-Semites n'all do the girls believe like many do that the sharp increase in anti-Semitism and the rise of attacks on Jews in the UK while Jeremy Corbyn was leader of a fairly open anti-Semitic party was partly or all down to him ??? ... I think I know the answer already but many others do blame him and if him and his party is to blame then surely they incited hatred and incited violence, something Jeremy acknowledged through his disgraceful response to the report and something Sure Queer Stammer acknowledges with his speech about not wanting the likes of Barry in the party anymore ??? It was all just an illusion to smear Labour and Corbyn which i have to say I'm surprised you can even see given your (note) history. There are no attacks, there is no violence, it's just a needy group wanting attention. Now on to a much more important subject.The Uk is one of the worlds biggest importers of Chinese Honey which is basically completely sugar syrup. Don't buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-01-14 7:02 AM Given the sisters on here are all mainly rabid Corbynites and to be fair we do have some anti-Semites n'all do the girls believe like many do that the sharp increase in anti-Semitism and the rise of attacks on Jews in the UK while Jeremy Corbyn was leader of a fairly open anti-Semitic party was partly or all down to him ??? ... I think I know the answer already but many others do blame him and if him and his party is to blame then surely they incited hatred and incited violence, something Jeremy acknowledged through his disgraceful response to the report and something Sure Queer Stammer acknowledges with his speech about not wanting the likes of Barry in the party anymore ??? Here you go again trying to weaponise antisemitism. Earlier in this thread you said this image was photoshopped, care to admit that you have been mistakenly shouting "fake news " ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-01-14 7:02 AM Queer Stammer I have listened to Keir Starmer for hours and never heard him stammer. He wouldn't have done so well as a barrister if he did. Wheras BoJo stammers all the time. So how do you expect people to know who you are talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 What a surprise ... The sisters see it differently ... Chuckle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 4 years of violence, thuggery and death in the US not condemned by MSM, many Democrat politicians, BLM or our very own sisters ... ... Only now they screech their disapproval ... Lordy ... Hypocrites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John52 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-01-14 8:48 AM What a surprise ... The sisters see it differently ... Chuckle What sisters? And just to be clear who is 'Queer Stammer'? Is it someone who actually stammers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartO Posted January 14, 2021 Author Share Posted January 14, 2021 Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 StuartO - 2021-01-14 9:27 AM Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. I'm in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartO Posted January 14, 2021 Author Share Posted January 14, 2021 Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartO Posted January 14, 2021 Author Share Posted January 14, 2021 Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 StuartO - 2021-01-14 9:27 AM Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. "Gentleman of Chatterbox" ... You do know we have women on Chatterbox or do you just prefer if it were a gentlemen club ??? ... As for your other stuff ... How very childish and how very brave of you to want to shut someone down rather than debate ... As for your new found dislike of supposed insults its pretty much like your new found dislike of violence in the US as in I dont see you taking issue with others who supposedly use "insults" ... Of course you and others could shut me up very, very easily by giving the proof of what you preach but you cant ...By the way If you asked me to post up where in speeches delivered by Hitler he incited hatred towards Jews I could do that easily and lets be fair we have a member on here who has likened POTUS Trump to Hitler more than once ... Try growing some Stuart rather than running ... I will say though I appreciate you have said this publicly rather than sending PMs privately to members like you have to me in the past ... Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barryd999 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Birdbrain - 2021-01-14 6:12 AM Barryd999 - 2021-01-13 9:41 PM Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 8:02 PM jumpstart - 2021-01-13 7:57 PM Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 7:46 PM Page 8 of this thread and not one of the sisters has shown anything other than their pure hatred to back up their claims ... Wow What a hooooot....got your eyes open yet ? My eyes are open thanks ... Still looking and waiting after 8 pages for one single bit of evidence ??? ... No point getting you all dizzy and asking to provide it though ... Given your intelligence levels ya prolly dont know who Trump is ... Go back to sleep princess Did you not watch the link I cued up for you? Trump, Giuliani and Trump Jr all inciting the crowd to violence. Everyone around the world has seen it and it would appear that the vast majority agree, it was incitement. What happens next I guess will depend on the judicial process in America. With any luck they will all get thrown in jail. Either way if you cannot see whats been put in front of you as clear evidence of incitement that led to a Terrorist attack on the heart of democracy then you are in denial. Yes ... What part exactly of the link are you on about ??? ... Your hypocrisy is unbelievable ... "I dont give a toss about America" when its blatantly obvious you do, well you give a toss about one American ... You condemn others for supposedly inciting violence without showing any proof to back up the claim while finding UK thuggery, violence and criminality "funny" and Union Flag burning is a "photo opportunity" ... Keep on "not giving a toss" Barry Watch it again. All three of them inciting violence to an already angry mob. Listen to the first three statements and tell me if you really think that such statements to an angry armed mob was not inciting violence. It is absolutely clear to all who can open their eyes what the intention was. Trumps entire "Steal" campaign over the past two months has been engineered to lead to this moment. He has whipped up these morons into such a frenzy over the voter fraud conspiracy that they are now truly radicalised and they truly believe they are right and righteous in their actions. Its exactly what happens with Terrorism which you of all people seeing as its one of your pet subjects should understand. There is the proof right there! The proof is his entire fake campaign from the past two months. The whole world can see it, why cant you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CurtainRaiser Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Perhaps the thing that will really hang Trump is his refusal to agree to the National Guard being deployed, aided and abetted by the stooges he appointed to the Pentagon after the November election. "On the day of the Capitol riot on Jan. 6, the first National Guard members arrived to assist at about 5:40 p.m. By then, most of the violence had subsided. In the critical minutes before rioters had breached the Capitol building around 2 p.m., the chief of the U.S. Capitol Police force and the mayor of Washington, D.C., put out urgent requests for guard backup. But it took more than an hour to get formal approval for their deployment, and then nearly three more hours for the first guard reinforcements to arrive. The D.C. National Guard reports to the president. In a recorded video the following day, President Donald Trump claimed that he “immediately deployed the National Guard and federal law enforcement to secure the building and expel the intruders.” But Trump’s claim that he acted quickly is contradicted by news reports citing unnamed sources who say the president initially resisted efforts to bring in the National Guard at the outset of the Capitol riot. The New York Times, citing unnamed Defense Department officials, said it was Vice President Mike Pence, not Trump, who approved deployment of the D.C. National Guard that afternoon. The Times also cited a “person with knowledge of the events” who said Trump “initially rebuffed and resisted requests to mobilize the National Guard “and that the “mobilization was initiated with the help of Pat A. Cipollone, the White House counsel, among other officials.” CNN also reported that Trump “initially resisted” deploying the guard, according to an unnamed “source familiar” with the decision to call in the National Guard. Neither report says how long Trump may have resisted the call — minutes, hours? — whether that led to any appreciable delay in activating the guard, or whether an earlier deployment could have averted the worst of the violence. Defense Department officials stress that Capitol Police did not request National Guard troops for the Capitol prior to the event — despite repeated offers from the military. The guard is “not designed to be an emergency response force,” one defense official told the Wall Street Journal. So why weren’t National Guard troops included in the plans leading up to the rally to guard the Capitol that day? Why did it take so long for the guard to arrive that afternoon? And what was Trump’s role? The answers to those questions are likely to emerge as investigations about the response unfold. Here, we present a timeline about the efforts to deploy National Guard troops. We’ll supplement this report as we learn more. The Planning Dec. 31: Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser and Dr. Christopher Rodriguez, the D.C. director of homeland security and emergency management agency, deliver a written request for D.C. National Guard support of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department for the rally, according to a Pentagon timeline issued Jan. 8. In her letter, Bowser says, “No DCNG personnel shall be armed during this mission, and at no time, will DCNG personnel or assets be engaged in domestic surveillance, searches, or seizures of US persons.” That same day, Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters has an hourlong phone conversation with Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund to express her “grave concerns” about proposed security for the rally, given that several right-wing extremist groups were expected to be in attendance. Waters says Sund — who did not request National Guard backup prior to the day of the riot — assured her the Capitol plaza would be “absolutely secured” and that rally attendees “would not be able to get inside or on top of the Capitol building.” The Capitol Police has jurisdiction over the federal Capitol building and grounds, while the D.C. police force has jurisdiction over city streets and property. Jan. 3: The Department of Defense confirms with Capitol Police that there is no request for DoD support, according to the Pentagon. Acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller meets with “select Cabinet Members to discuss DoD support to law enforcement agencies and potential requirements for DoD support,” the Pentagon says. Miller and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, meet with Trump, according to the Department of Defense. Trump agrees to activate the D.C. National Guard to support D.C. police (not Capitol Police) with crowd and traffic control. The Pentagon later tells Pro Publica, “The President had no role in tactical matters as the capabilities deployed and location were dictated solely by the request from D.C. government.” D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee says 340 guardsmen will assist with crowd management and traffic control to free up the city police officers to respond to potential acts of violence and other security issues, according to CNN. Jan. 4: Capitol Police again confirms there is no need for DoD support in a phone call with Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, according to the Pentagon. Miller, in consultation with Milley, McCarthy and DoD general counsel, “reviews the Department’s plan to be prepared to provide support to civil authorities, if asked, and approves activation of 340 members of the DCNG to support Mayor Bowser’s request.” The support is mostly for traffic control, crowd control at subway stations and logistics support. Miller also authorizes McCarthy to deploy a “Quick Reaction Force” of 40 National Guard members staged at Joint Base Andrews in Maryland “if additional support is requested by civil authorities.” Capitol Police Chief Sund asks the House and Senate sergeant-at-arms about the possibility of placing the D.C. National Guard on standby, in case the Capitol Police needed quick backup. In an interview with the Washington Post published on Jan. 10, Sund says they were hesitant to agree. According to the article, “House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving said he wasn’t comfortable with the ‘optics’ of formally declaring an emergency ahead of the demonstration, Sund said. Meanwhile, Senate Sergeant at Arms Michael Stenger suggested that Sund should informally seek out his Guard contacts, asking them to ‘lean forward’ and be on alert in case Capitol Police needed their help.” All three officials — Sund, Irving and Stenger — have since resigned. Jan. 5: According to the Pentagon, Mayor Bowser delivers a letter addressed to the U.S. acting attorney general, Miller and McCarthy confirming that there are no additional support requests from the D.C. National Guard. Bowser later says that she already had the support she requested from the National Guard and that any decision to request guard forces to protect the Capitol is not hers. “The Capitol Police and the leadership at the Capitol, they did not make the decision to call in guard support,” Bowser later says in a press conference on Jan. 7. “I cannot order the Army, the National Guard, to the United States Capitol grounds. I can, in the district, with the approval of the secretary of the Army.” According to an internal document reviewed by the Washington Post, an FBI office in Virginia issues a warning that extremists are preparing to commit violence in Washington on Jan. 6. According to the bulletin — which Steven D’Antuono, head of the FBI’s Washington field office, said was shared “with all our law enforcement partners” through the joint terrorism task force — “An online thread discussed specific calls for violence to include stating ‘Be ready to fight. Congress needs to hear glass breaking, doors being kicked in, and blood from their BLM and Pantifa slave soldiers being spilled. Get violent. Stop calling this a march, or rally, or a protest. Go there ready for war. We get our President or we die. NOTHING else will achieve this goal.” Sund told the Post he never received nor was made aware of the FBI’s field bulletin. The Day of the Rally 12:40 p.m.: The first protesters arrive at the Capitol, where Congress is meeting in joint session to certify Joe Biden’s election. 1.p.m.: Trump begins to wrap up his speech at the “Save America” rally at the Ellipse, a park near the White House. He tells rallygoers the presidential election was “stolen” by Democrats and the “fake news media,” and says that he’s going to walk with the crowd to the Capitol “to try and give our Republicans, the weak ones … the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.” But Trump does not accompany the rally attendees to the Capitol. Sund says he already realizes “things aren’t going well,” that the protesters came with riot helmets, gas masks, pepper spray, fireworks, metal pipes and baseball bats. Sund calls Metropolitan Police Chief Contee, who sends 100 officers to the Capitol, with the first ones arriving within 10 minutes, according to Sund’s interview with the Washington Post. 1:09 p.m.: Sund tells Irving and Stenger by phone that the National Guard is needed. Sund says both men told him they would “run it up the chain.” 1:26 p.m.: Capitol Police order the evacuation of the Capitol complex. 1:34 p.m.: In a phone call with Secretary of the Army McCarthy, Bowser requests an “unspecified number of additional forces,” according to the Pentagon timeline. 1:49 p.m.: Sund, in a phone call with the commanding general of the D.C. National Guard, Maj. Gen. William Walker, requests immediate assistance, and tells him to prepare to bring in the guard. About 2 p.m.: Rioters breach the Capitol. In an interview with the Washington Post published on Jan. 10, Sund says, “If we would have had the National Guard we could have held them at bay longer, until more officers from our partner agencies could arrive.” 2:10 p.m.: Sund says Irving calls him back with formal approval to send in the guard. But as the Washington Post noted, “Sund finally had approval to call the National Guard. But that would prove to be just the beginning of a bureaucratic nightmare to get soldiers on the scene.” 2:22 p.m.: The secretary of the Army, Bowser, D.C. police leadership and others “discuss the current situation and to request additional DCNG support,” according to the Pentagon timeline. 2:24 p.m.: Trump tweets, “Mike Pence didn’t have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our Country and our Constitution, giving States a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth!” 2:26 p.m.: Sund says he joins the conference call to plead for additional backup. “I am making urgent, urgent immediate request for National Guard assistance,” Sund recalls saying. According to Sund and others on the call, the Washington Post reports, Lt. Gen. Walter E. Piatt, director of the Army staff, says he could not recommend that to his boss, McCarthy, because, “I don’t like the visual of the National Guard standing a police line with the Capitol in the background.” However, Piatt disputed that, saying in a statement: “I did not make the statement or any comments similar to what was attributed to me by Chief Sund in the Washington Post article — but would note that even in his telling he makes it clear that neither I, nor anyone else from [the Department of Defense], denied the deployment of requested personnel.” 2:30 p.m.: Miller, Milley and McCarthy meet to discuss the requests from Capitol Police and Bowser. 3 p.m.: Miller “determines all available forces of the DCNG are required to reinforce MPD [Metropolitan Police Department] and USCP positions to support efforts to reestablish security of the Capitol complex,” according to the Pentagon timeline. Simultaneously, the D.C. National Guard prepares to move 150 personnel to support Capitol Police, pending Miller’s approval. 3:04 p.m.: Miller “provides verbal approval of the full activation of DCNG (1100 total) in support of the MPD,” according to the Pentagon. In response, McCarthy immediately directs the D.C. National Guard “to initiate movement and full mobilization.” That means the D.C. guard members helping with traffic and crowd control are redeployed to support the Metropolitan Police Department at the Capitol, and the entire D.C. guard begins full mobilization. 3:19 p.m.: McCarthy explains in a phone call to Sen. Chuck Schumer and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that Miller has already approved full DCNG mobilization. Miller later releases a statement saying, “Chairman Milley and I just spoke separately with the Vice President and with Speaker Pelosi, Leader McConnell, Senator Schumer and Representative Hoyer about the situation at the U.S. Capitol. We have fully activated the D.C. National Guard to assist federal and local law enforcement as they work to peacefully address the situation.” No mention is made of Trump’s involvement. 3:36 p.m.: White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany tweets: “At President @realDonaldTrump’s direction, the National Guard is on the way along with other federal protective services.” 4:17 p.m.: Trump releases a video on social media in which he states, in part, “We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election and everyone knows it, especially the other side, but you have to go home now. We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. … We love you. You’re very special. You’ve seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel. But go home and go home in peace.” 5:02 p.m.: 154 members of the D.C. National Guard leave the D.C. Armory. 5:40 p.m.: The first National Guard personnel arrive at the Capitol. By then, most of the violence had ended. 6 p.m.: A citywide curfew goes into effect. 6:01 p.m.: Trump tweets, “These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!” 6:14 p.m.: Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police and the D.C. National Guard “successfully establish perimeter on the west side of the U.S. Capitol,” the Pentagon timeline states. 8 p.m.: Capitol Police declare the Capitol building secure. 8:06 p.m.: Vice President Mike Pence reopens the Senate. “The Capitol is secured and the people’s work continues,” Pence says. “To those who wreaked havoc in our Capitol today, you did not win. Violence never wins. Freedom wins, and this is still the people’s house.” Pelosi brings the House back into session less than an hour later. Early the next morning, Pence officially affirmed the election results and that Joe Biden won the presidency. In total, five people died as a result of the riot, including Capitol Police Officer Brian D. Sicknick, who was “injured while physically engaging with protesters” and died as a result of those injuries the day after the riot, according to Capitol Police. Two Senate committees have announced a joint investigation into security failures related to the Jan. 6 riot. “I think that there’s going to be a lot of time for us to figure out what happened,” D.C. Mayor Bowser said on Jan. 7. “Obviously it was a failure or you would not have had police lines breached and people enter the Capitol building by breaking windows and terrorizing the people, the members of Congress who were doing a very sacred constitutional requirement of their jobs. So clearly there was a failure there.”" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malc d Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 StuartO - 2021-01-14 9:27 AM Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. The vast majority of forum members already do ignore his posts. :-| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdbrain Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Barryd999 - 2021-01-14 10:16 AM Birdbrain - 2021-01-14 6:12 AM Barryd999 - 2021-01-13 9:41 PM Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 8:02 PM jumpstart - 2021-01-13 7:57 PM Birdbrain - 2021-01-13 7:46 PM Page 8 of this thread and not one of the sisters has shown anything other than their pure hatred to back up their claims ... Wow What a hooooot....got your eyes open yet ? My eyes are open thanks ... Still looking and waiting after 8 pages for one single bit of evidence ??? ... No point getting you all dizzy and asking to provide it though ... Given your intelligence levels ya prolly dont know who Trump is ... Go back to sleep princess Did you not watch the link I cued up for you? Trump, Giuliani and Trump Jr all inciting the crowd to violence. Everyone around the world has seen it and it would appear that the vast majority agree, it was incitement. What happens next I guess will depend on the judicial process in America. With any luck they will all get thrown in jail. Either way if you cannot see whats been put in front of you as clear evidence of incitement that led to a Terrorist attack on the heart of democracy then you are in denial. Yes ... What part exactly of the link are you on about ??? ... Your hypocrisy is unbelievable ... "I dont give a toss about America" when its blatantly obvious you do, well you give a toss about one American ... You condemn others for supposedly inciting violence without showing any proof to back up the claim while finding UK thuggery, violence and criminality "funny" and Union Flag burning is a "photo opportunity" ... Keep on "not giving a toss" Barry Watch it again. All three of them inciting violence to an already angry mob. Listen to the first three statements and tell me if you really think that such statements to an angry armed mob was not inciting violence. It is absolutely clear to all who can open their eyes what the intention was. Trumps entire "Steal" campaign over the past two months has been engineered to lead to this moment. He has whipped up these morons into such a frenzy over the voter fraud conspiracy that they are now truly radicalised and they truly believe they are right and righteous in their actions. Its exactly what happens with Terrorism which you of all people seeing as its one of your pet subjects should understand. There is the proof right there! The proof is his entire fake campaign from the past two months. The whole world can see it, why cant you? "Trumps entire steal campaign over the past two months has been engineered to lead to this moment" ... Are you mad ... What on earth would he gain by whipping up "the mob" to violently break into one of the US most sacred buildings causing death along the way ??? ... If as you more than suggest that was the intention what was the long term plan ??? ... Were the terrorists going to take over with POTUS Trump at the helm ??? ... For 2 months POTUS Trump has alleged the election was stolen and you seem more than annoyed by that but yet you dont mind that The Democrats have done the same for the last 4 years over Trumps election win and you might want to educate on what Pelosi has previously said regarding that election being stolen ... Dont know why you are posting about the US anyway ... Remember you "dont give a toss about America" ... Hypocrite and you'll upset new self appointed moderator Stuart by replying to me so check with him first and his new Nazi like rules on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartO Posted January 14, 2021 Author Share Posted January 14, 2021 Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StuartO Posted January 14, 2021 Author Share Posted January 14, 2021 Gentlemen of Chatterbox, Birdbrain is resorting to side-tracking and provocative posts and throwing insults left right and centre to keep himself active on this (and other) threads, ignoring the widespread criticism he has faced, as if he was our own pestilent Donald Trump, careless of anyone's views other than his own and determined to bluster his way through. It makes no sense to respond to him any way. I suggest everyone simply ignores his posts altogether from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.